[Synopsis] 0The alignment of the electron spin with the external magnetic field give rise to paramagnetism. Whereas, the orbital motions of the electrons give rise to diamagnetism. In this paper we consider the idealized problem of a free spinless electron gas in an external magnetic field H＝H^^ｚ . A free electron moves in a circular orbital quantized normal to the uniform magnetic field with the cycrotron frequency ω＝<—eμ_0H>/m. The energy eigenvalues in two-dimesional electron system E_j ＝hω_0(j＋1/2)＝βH(2j＋1) (j＝0,1,2,･･･) are the Landau energy levels. β is a Bohr magneton. g＝<—eμ_0H>/hL^2 is the degeneracy of a Landau level . In the low-temperature limit of electron in Landau levels, the electrons have a tendency to occupy the lowest available levels. As the magnetic field is decrease, each Landau level can accommodate fewer electrons because the degeneracy g is decreased. Consequently, some electrons will be forced to jump up to a higher level. This cause the oscillation of the low-temperature magnetic susceptibility X_m as a inverse function of the magnetic field 1/H. The magnetization M also oscillates as a function of the magnetic field. We call these phenomena the de Haas-Van Alphen effect.
A complete set of coherent-state wave packets has been constructed for an electron in a uniform magnetic field. These states are nonspreading packets of minimum uncertainty that follow the classical motion. Use was made of the ladder operators that generate all the eigen-states of the Hamiltonian from any one energy eigenstate. The coherent states are the eigenstates of the two ladder operators that annihilate the zero-angular-momentum ground state. We have calculated the partition function, exploiting advantages of the coherent-state basis. The Landau diamagnetism and the de Haas-van Alphen oscillations are contained in the coherent-state framework.
1. In a recent paper Landau has shown that, when electrons are moving freely in a magnetic field, they exhibit, in addition to the paramagnetic effect of their spin, a diamagnetic effect due to their motion. This result is rather unexpected, since it is quite contrary to the classical case. There it might appear as though the circles described by the electrons must produce a magnetic moment, but the error was long ago pointed out by Bohr. The motion of the electrons must be confined to some region by means of a boundary wall, and the electrons near the wall describe a succession of circular arcs, repeatedly bouncing on the wall, and slowly creeping round it in the direction opposite to that of the uninterrupted circles; when the moment of these electrons is taken into account, it exactly cancels out that due to the free circles. In Landau's work it is of course necessary to consider the boundary, but he shows how allowance is to be made for it by an appropriate process. The complete justification is rather subtle, and so it may be worth considering a special case, admitting of exact solution, which takes the boundary into account, and so makes it possible to follow more closely the analogy between the classical and quantum problems. With regard to the general case with a boundary wall of any type, we shall only observe that the different results arise, because in the wave problem ψ must vanish at the bounding “potential wall,” and so will be small near it; this upsets the balance of the electric current near the wall, and yields the magnetic moment.
First, the experimental foundations for the existence of a new dynamical variable, the spin of particles, are presented. The Pauli equation is then derived in detail, two applications are given and the energy levels of a particle with spin in a constant magnetic field are studied. This is the analysis of Landau levels, which can be performed by using the known results on the spectrum of harmonic oscillators. In this chapter we also study in detail the addition of orbital angular momentum and spin, as well as the spin–orbit interaction with the resulting Thomas precession. Stern-Gerlach experiment and electron spin The hypothesis that the electron has an intrinsic magnetic moment and an angular momentum, in short a spin , was first suggested in Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1926). They noticed, even before the discovery of quantum mechanics, that a complete description of spectra was not possible unless a magnetic moment and a mechanical moment were ascribed to the electron, and hence the concept of an electron as a point charge was insufficient. First, let us therefore try to understand how a magnetic moment can be associated to an atomic system. For this purpose, consider for simplicity the Bohr model of an hydrogen atom, where the electron moves along a circular orbit and rotates with orbital angular momentum L .
1.General mathematical theory.---Modifications are given in the general derivation of the Langevin-Debye formula by means of quantum mechanics published in part I which are required by the moment now being magnetic rather than electric. The main additions are the appearance of a diamagnetic term, and allowance for the fact that the magnetic moment consists of two parts arising respectively from orbital electronic motions and from the electrons' internal spins. These parts cannot always be treated as rigidly coupled to form a "permanent" resultant moment. The Hamiltonian function used for the internal spin is that of a spherical top.2.Diamagnetism.---The writer's previous claim that Pauli's formula for the diamagnetic susceptibility can be applied to molecules as well as atoms is shown to be invalid because of the anomalous fact that the square of the angular momentum, unlike the average angular momentum, does not vanish even in
S states when there is more than one nucleus. Pauli's formula is instead an upper limit to the diamagnetism in non-monatomic molecules and is a good approximation when the Schr\"odinger wave function has nearly as much symmetry as in an atomic
S state.3.Paramagnetism of atoms.---Limiting values for the paramagnetic susceptibilities of atoms are $\ensuremath{\chi}=N\frac{[4s(s+1)+k(k+1)]{\ensuremath{\beta}}^{2}}{3kT}$ and $\ensuremath{\chi}=[\frac{N{g}^{2}j(j+1){\ensuremath{\beta}}^{2}}{3kT}]+N\ensuremath{\alpha}$ where $\ensuremath{\beta}$ is the Bohr magneton and $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ is a constant. These two formulas are rigorously applicable when the multiplet intervals are respectively very small or very large compared to
kT, and are valid regardless of whether the magnetic field is strong enough to change the quantization by producing a Paschen-Back effect. The formula for small multiplets yields susceptibilities slightly different from those given by Laporte and Sommerfeld's expression for this case, and is much simpler, as they overlooked the contribution of the portion of the magnetic moment which is perpendicular to the invariable axis.4.Paramagnetism of molecules.---The susceptibility is calculated on the basis of the Hund theory of molecular quantization. Formulas are given applicable to his couplings of type (a) and type (b) provided in the former the multiplet intervals are either very large or very small compared to
kT. The experimental susceptibilities for
O2 and Cl
O2 are in accord with the assumption that the normal states are respectively
3S and
2S terms. In the particular case of
S terms the numerical results are the same in the atomic and molecular formulas, but, unlike previous theories, it is not necessary to suppose the orbits are as freely oriented in molecules as in atoms. Polyatomic molecules may have lower paramagnetic susceptibilities than diatomic ones because the dissymmetry causes large fluctuations in electronic angular momentum.5.Paramagnetism of nitic oxide.---Spectroscopists have recently found that the normal states of the NO molecule are
2P terms separated by 120.9 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. This permits an unambigous calculation of the susceptibility of NO which agrees with the experimental value within 1.5 per cent. Deviations from Curie's law are calculated which result from the doublet interval being comparable with
kT. These deviations should be detectable experimentally if the susceptibility of NO could be measured over a wide temperature range.
ln this paper, next subject is discussed, §32. The equation of state of an ideal gas. Here we consider the equation of state of a spinless ideal Fermi gas. ln high temperatures and low density, we obtain the form of a virial expansion of the equation of state. The corrections to the classical ideal gas law are due to quantum effects. The second virial coefficient is deduced. In low temperature and high densities, we obtain the expansion for the chemical potential in the expansion parameter /<ε_F>. Next we obtain the asynptotic expansion of the internal energyU in the expansion parameter /<ε_F>. We also obtain the specific heat at constant volume C_V.~