Quantum algorithms can be expressed as quantum circuits when the circuit model of computation is adopted. Such a circuit description is usually hardware-agnostic, that is, it does not consider the limitations that the quantum hardware might have. In order to make quantum algorithms executable on quantum devices they need to comply to their constraints, which mainly affect the parallelism of quantum operations and the possible interactions between the qubits. The process of adapting a quantum circuit to meet the quantum chip restrictions is known as mapping. The resulting circuit usually has a higher number of gates and depth, decreasing the algorithm's reliability. Different mapping solutions have been already proposed. Most of them are meant for a specific quantum processor and differ in methodology, approach and features. In addition, they are usually only compared in terms of added gates, circuit depth and compilation time. No thorough comparative analysis of the different mapping solutions performance and features has been performed so far.In this paper, we propose to apply structured design space exploration (DSE) methodologies to the mapping procedures. This will allow not only to have a more in depth and structured analysis of their performance but also to identify what features are key and worth to implement. By using DSE we will be able to: i) determine in what regimes some mapping solutions outperform others; ii) derive optimal mapping strategies for specific quantum algorithms and quantum processors; and iii) perform an scalability analysis. In addition, DSE techniques cannot only be applied to the mapping layer that is key for bridging quantum applications to quantum devices, but also to the full-stack quantum computing system allowing for its crosslayer co-design.
Quantum algorithms can be expressed as quantum circuits when the circuit model of computation is adopted. Such a circuit description is usually hardware-agnostic, that is, it does not consider the limitations that the quantum hardware might have. In order to make quantum algorithms executable on quantum devices they need to comply to their constraints, which mainly affect the parallelism of quantum operations and the possible interactions between the qubits. The process of adapting a quantum circuit to meet the quantum chip restrictions is known as mapping. The resulting circuit usually has a higher number of gates and depth, decreasing the algorithm's reliability. Different mapping solutions have been already proposed. Most of them are meant for a specific quantum processor and differ in methodology, approach and features. In addition, they are usually only compared in terms of added gates, circuit depth and compilation time. No thorough comparative analysis of the different mapping solutions performance and features has been performed so far.In this paper, we propose to apply structured design space exploration (DSE) methodologies to the mapping procedures. This will allow not only to have a more in depth and structured analysis of their performance but also to identify what features are key and worth to implement. By using DSE we will be able to: i) determine in what regimes some mapping solutions outperform others; ii) derive optimal mapping strategies for specific quantum algorithms and quantum processors; and iii) perform an scalability analysis. In addition, DSE techniques cannot only be applied to the mapping layer that is key for bridging quantum applications to quantum devices, but also to the full-stack quantum computing system allowing for its crosslayer co-design.
Quantum computers have emerged as an alternative computer paradigm that will allow to solve some complex problems of large numbers that are not tractable for classical computers, e.g. factorization. Quantum computers also have the ability to simulate quantum mechanics in a real and direct way. The development of quantum computers faces many unique obstacles. In recent years, various quantum computer prototypes have been created by com- panies such as Google and IBM, on which we can run some quantum algorithms. But these prototypes are far from the quantum computers we envision and can function like today?s classical computers. It is said that we are in the time of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers. This means that current quantum computers are very noisy and their size is very small compared to classical comput- ers. The challenge with small, noisy quantum devices running quantum algorithms is that due to the hardware limitations they face which must be respected, quantum algorithm needs to be modified before their execution on quantum devices. To solve this problem in quantum computers, a mapping process is needed, which is part of the compilation step that modifies the quantum algorithms to take into account all the limitations of the targeted quantum device. After mapping process, the resulting quantum circuit usually has a higher number of gates and (execution time) latency, decreasing the algorithm?s reliability. Different mapping solutions have been already proposed. Most of them are meant for a specific quan- tum processor and different in methodology, approach and features. In addition, they are usually only compared in terms of added gates (gate overhead) or added circuit execution time (latency overhead). No thorough comparative analysis of the different mapping solutions performance and features has been performed so far. In this thesis, we apply structured Design Space Exploration to the mapping of quantum circuits. By doing so, we will be able to have a deeper understanding of this process, make a thorough comparison of the mapper approaches and even develop optimized solutions for given applications and quantum devices. Moreover, we apply Design Space Exploration to the generation of quantum algorithms used as benchmarks and start to explore profiling them in a structured approach.
Abstract Design space exploration (DSE) plays an important role in optimising quantum circuit execution by systematically evaluating different configurations of compilation strategies and hardware settings. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive investigation into the impact of various layout methods, qubit routing techniques, and optimisation levels, as well as device-specific properties such as different variants and strengths of noise and imperfections, the topological structure of qubits, connectivity densities, and back-end sizes. By spanning through these dimensions, we aim to understand the interplay between compilation choices and hardware characteristics. A key question driving our exploration is whether the optimal selection of device parameters, mapping techniques, comprising of initial layout strategies and routing heuristics can mitigate device induced errors beyond standard error mitigation approaches. Our results show that carefully selecting software strategies (e.g., mapping and routing algorithms) and tailoring hardware characteristics (such as minimising noise and leveraging topology and connectivity density) significantly improve the fidelity of circuit execution outcomes, and thus the expected correctness or success probability of the computational result. We provide estimates based on key metrics such as circuit depth, gate count and expected fidelity. Our results highlight the importance of hardware–software co-design, particularly as quantum systems scale to larger dimensions, and along the way towards fully error corrected quantum systems: Our study is based on computationally noisy simulations, but considers various implementations of quantum error correction (QEC) using the same approach as for other algorithms. The observed sensitivity of circuit fidelity to noise and connectivity suggests that co-design principles will be equally critical when integrating QEC in future systems. Our exploration provides practical guidelines for co-optimising physical mapping, qubit routing, and hardware configurations in realistic quantum computing scenarios.
Design space exploration (DSE) plays an important role in optimising quantum circuit execution by systematically evaluating different configurations of compilation strategies and hardware settings. In this work, we study the impact of layout methods, qubit routing techniques, compiler optimization levels, and hardware-specific properties, including noise characteristics, topological structures, connectivity densities, and device sizes. By traversing these dimensions, we aim to understand how compilation choices interact with hardware features. A central question in our study is whether carefully selected device parameters and mapping strategies, including initial layouts and routing heuristics, can mitigate hardware-induced errors beyond standard error mitigation methods. Our results show that choosing the right software strategies (e.g., layout and routing) and tailoring hardware properties (e.g., reducing noise or leveraging connectivity) significantly enhances the fidelity of quantum circuit executions. We provide performance estimates using metrics such as circuit depth, gate count, and expected fidelity. These findings highlight the value of hardware-software co-design, especially as quantum systems scale and move toward error-corrected computing. Our simulations, though noisy, include quantum error correction (QEC) scenarios, revealing similar sensitivities to layout and connectivity. This suggests that co-design principles will be vital for integrating QEC in future devices. Overall, we offer practical guidance for co-optimizing mapping, routing, and hardware configuration in real-world quantum computing.
In the midst of the NISQ era of quantum computers, the challenges are gravitating to encompass both architecting and full-stack engineering aspects, which are inherently algorithm-driven, so that there starts to be a convergence of bottom-up and top down design approaches, what we coin as the Quantum Architecting (QuArch) era. In face of many-fold diverse design proposals, in this paper it is postulated and proposed to apply the so-called Design Space Exploration (DSE) to the full vertical stack of quantum systems as an instrumental methodology to address such design diversity challenge. This structured design means, based upon composing a multidimensional input design space together with compressing the set of output performance metrics into an optimization-oriented overall figure of merit, provides a framework and method for optimization, for performance comparison. It yields as well a way to discriminate among alternative techniques at all layers and across layers, eventually as a structured and comprehensive design-oriented formal framework to address the quantum system design and evaluation complexity. The paper concludes by illustrating instances of this methodology in optimizing and comparing mapping techniques to address the resource-constrained current NISQ quantum chips, and to carry out a quantitative gap analysis of scalability trends aiming manycore distributed quantum architectures.
Abstract To execute quantum circuits on a quantum processor, they must be modified to meet the physical constraints of the quantum device. This process, called quantum circuit mapping , results in a gate/circuit depth overhead that depends on both the circuit properties and the hardware constraints, being the limited qubit connectivity a crucial restriction. In this paper, we propose to extend the characterization of quantum circuits by including qubit interaction graph properties using graph theory-based metrics in addition to previously used circuit-describing parameters. This approach allows for an in-depth analysis and clustering of quantum circuits and a comparison of performance when run on different quantum processors, aiding in developing better mapping techniques. Our study reveals a correlation between interaction graph-based parameters and mapping performance metrics for various existing configurations of quantum devices. We also provide a comprehensive collection of quantum circuits and algorithms for benchmarking future compilation techniques and quantum devices.
Quantum circuit compilation is a multi-stage process that translates a high-level quantum circuit representation into a sequence of quantum gates that can be directly executed by a quantum machine. One of the core steps in quantum compilation is mapping, a procedure that transforms a quantum circuit into a semantically equivalent circuit while inserting additional gates to comply with the architectural constraints of the underlying quantum hardware. Current mapping techniques exhibit significant performance degradation—in terms of circuit depth and gate count—when applied to large-scale circuits containing hundreds of thousands of gates or more. In this work, we propose a novel methodology to enhance quantum compiler capabilities by adapting general principles from classical Electronic Design Automation. We model the quantum hardware as being composed of standard cells, onto which portions of the circuit are mapped using a floorplanning-based technique. This contrasts with current state-of-the-art solutions, which perform mapping at the gate level without considering any form of hierarchical abstraction. We use the ChaCha20 stream cipher as a running example to validate and explain our strategy. We evaluate our methodology using two well-known, industrial-grade quantum compilers: IBM Qiskit and Quantinuum TKET. Compared to these compilers, our approach achieves an average circuit depth reduction of 59.78% and 68.85%, respectively, and a gate count reduction of 4.07 % and 6.20 %, respectively. These results are obtained across a large set of randomly generated quantum circuit descriptions in the range of millions of gates, with varying input and output connectivity for each block in the circuit.