Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Magnetic translation and Berry's phase factor through adiabatically rotating a magnetic field

J. Chee

Published Jan 1, 2000• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

For a spin subjected to an adiabatically changing magnetic field, the solid angle result as embodied by a rotation operator is the only path-dependent factor in the quantum evolution operator. For a charged particle, the infinite degeneracy calls for a rigorous investigation. We find that in this case, it is the product of the rotation operator and a magnetic translation operator that is the path-dependent factor in the quantum evolution operator. This result agrees with the fact that the instantaneous hamiltonian is invariant under magnetic translation as well as rotation. Simple experimental verification is proposed.

Related papers

Nonadiabatic factor accompanying magnetic translation of a charged particle

J. Chee

The quantum adiabatic theorem incorporating the Berry phase phenomenon can be characterized as a factorization of the time evolution operator into a path-dependent geometric factor, a usual dynamical factor and a non-adiabatic factor that approaches the identity in the adiabatic limit. We study a case where all these three factors can be constructed explicitly and where the instantaneous Hamiltonian has infinitely degenerate energy eigenstates associated with magnetic translation symmetry. Significance of the non-adiabatic factor in terms of transition probabilities is discussed.

arXiv:0708.3726•Aug 28, 2007•0 citations

Spin in a general time-varying magnetic field: generalization of the adiabatic factorization of time evolution

J. Chee

An extension of the adiabatic factorization of the time evolution operator is studied for spin in a general time-varying magnetic field B ( t ). When B ( t ) changes adiabatically, such a factorization reduces to the product of the geometric operator which embodies the Berry phase phenomenon and a usual dynamical operator. For a general time variation of B ( t ), there should be a non-adiabatic operator in the factorization that is responsible for non-adiabatic transitions. A simple and explicit expression for the instantaneous angular velocity of the non-adiabatic operator is derived. This is done in a way that is independent of any specific representation of spin. Two classes of simple conditions are given under which the non-adiabatic operator itself can be made explicit. These conditions are used to find new expressions for B ( t ) that allow the explicit construction of the time evolution operator.

arXiv:1207.6497•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 19, 2010•2 citations

Quantum adiabatic approximation and the geometric phase

Ali Mostafazadeh

A precise definition of an adiabaticity parameter \ensuremath{\nu} of a time-dependent Hamiltonian is proposed. A variation of the time-dependent perturbation theory is presented which yields a series expansion of the evolution operator U(\ensuremath{\tau})=${\ensuremath{\sum}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) with ${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) being at least of the order ${\ensuremath{\nu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$. In particular, ${\mathrm{U}}^{(0)}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) corresponds to the adiabatic approximation and yields Berry's adiabatic phase. It is shown that this series expansion has nothing to do with the 1/\ensuremath{\tau} expansion of U(\ensuremath{\tau}). It is also shown that the nonadiabatic part of the evolution operator is generated by a transformed Hamiltonian which is off-diagonal in the eigenbasis of the initial Hamiltonian. This suggests the introduction of an adiabatic product expansion for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) which turns out to yield exact expressions for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) for a large number of quantum systems. In particular, a simple application of the adiabatic product expansion is used to show that for the Hamiltonian describing the dynamics of a magnetic dipole in an arbitrarily changing magnetic field, there exists another Hamiltonian with the same eigenvectors for which the Schr\"odinger equation is exactly solvable. Some related issues concerning geometric phases and their physical significance are also discussed.

arXiv:hep-th/9606053•Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1997•63 citations

ON ADIABATIC INVARIANCE IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Marius Kolsrud

A connection between quantum mechanical and classical adiabatic invariance is shown for the special case of a charged particle moving in a homogeneous, time-dependent magnetic field. The relationship consists of the fact that the transition probability between energy eigenstates corresponding to the magnnetic field at two different times is a function of a certain classical adiabatic invariant alone. From this relation follows the well-known result that during sufficiently slow changes of the magnetic field the particle will remain in one quantum state which passes continuously through the different instantaneous energies. The adiabatic invariance of this classical quantity is shown directly by solving the equations of niotion when the magnetic field changes linearly with time. (auth)

•Jan 1, 1958•0 citations

Non-adiabatic Non-cyclic Generalization of the Berry Phase for a Spin-1/2 Particle in a Rotating Magnetic Field

Siamak Sadat Gousheh, Azadeh Mohammadi, Leila Shahkarami

In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo $2π$, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1212.2104•Dec 10, 2012•1 citation

A CLASSICAL MODLE OF QUANTUM BERRY'S PHASE FACTOR

Chen Sun

Considering that the classical evolution equations are similar to the Schrodinger eqaution, we point out that there is the structure of the Berry's Phase in the solution of a classical evolution eqaution with adiabatic changing parameters. Thus, we can use a classical evolution process to imitate the quantum adiabatic process. As an example, the motion of a charged particle in slowly-changing magnetic field is studied and the corresponding phase factor can be interpreted as a holomony of the fiber bundle on the sphare s~2 in the parameter space.

Chinese Physics C•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations
For a spin subjected to an adiabatically changing magnetic field, the solid angle result as embodied by a rotation operator is the only path-dependent factor in the quantum evolution operator. For a charged particle, the infinite degeneracy calls for a rigorous investigation. We find that in this case, it is the product of the rotation operator and a magnetic translation operator that is the path-dependent factor in the quantum evolution operator. This result agrees with the fact that the instantaneous hamiltonian is invariant under magnetic translation as well as rotation. Simple experimental verification is proposed.
The quantum adiabatic theorem incorporating the Berry phase phenomenon can be characterized as a factorization of the time evolution operator into a path-dependent geometric factor, a usual dynamical factor and a non-adiabatic factor that approaches the identity in the adiabatic limit. We study a case where all these three factors can be constructed explicitly and where the instantaneous Hamiltonian has infinitely degenerate energy eigenstates associated with magnetic translation symmetry. Significance of the non-adiabatic factor in terms of transition probabilities is discussed.
An extension of the adiabatic factorization of the time evolution operator is studied for spin in a general time-varying magnetic field B ( t ). When B ( t ) changes adiabatically, such a factorization reduces to the product of the geometric operator which embodies the Berry phase phenomenon and a usual dynamical operator. For a general time variation of B ( t ), there should be a non-adiabatic operator in the factorization that is responsible for non-adiabatic transitions. A simple and explicit expression for the instantaneous angular velocity of the non-adiabatic operator is derived. This is done in a way that is independent of any specific representation of spin. Two classes of simple conditions are given under which the non-adiabatic operator itself can be made explicit. These conditions are used to find new expressions for B ( t ) that allow the explicit construction of the time evolution operator.
A precise definition of an adiabaticity parameter \ensuremath{\nu} of a time-dependent Hamiltonian is proposed. A variation of the time-dependent perturbation theory is presented which yields a series expansion of the evolution operator U(\ensuremath{\tau})=${\ensuremath{\sum}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) with ${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) being at least of the order ${\ensuremath{\nu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$. In particular, U(0){\mathrm{U}}^{(0)}U(0)(\ensuremath{\tau}) corresponds to the adiabatic approximation and yields Berry's adiabatic phase. It is shown that this series expansion has nothing to do with the 1/\ensuremath{\tau} expansion of U(\ensuremath{\tau}). It is also shown that the nonadiabatic part of the evolution operator is generated by a transformed Hamiltonian which is off-diagonal in the eigenbasis of the initial Hamiltonian. This suggests the introduction of an adiabatic product expansion for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) which turns out to yield exact expressions for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) for a large number of quantum systems. In particular, a simple application of the adiabatic product expansion is used to show that for the Hamiltonian describing the dynamics of a magnetic dipole in an arbitrarily changing magnetic field, there exists another Hamiltonian with the same eigenvectors for which the Schr\"odinger equation is exactly solvable. Some related issues concerning geometric phases and their physical significance are also discussed.
A connection between quantum mechanical and classical adiabatic invariance is shown for the special case of a charged particle moving in a homogeneous, time-dependent magnetic field. The relationship consists of the fact that the transition probability between energy eigenstates corresponding to the magnnetic field at two different times is a function of a certain classical adiabatic invariant alone. From this relation follows the well-known result that during sufficiently slow changes of the magnetic field the particle will remain in one quantum state which passes continuously through the different instantaneous energies. The adiabatic invariance of this classical quantity is shown directly by solving the equations of niotion when the magnetic field changes linearly with time. (auth)
In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo 2π2π2π, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.
Considering that the classical evolution equations are similar to the Schrodinger eqaution, we point out that there is the structure of the Berry's Phase in the solution of a classical evolution eqaution with adiabatic changing parameters. Thus, we can use a classical evolution process to imitate the quantum adiabatic process. As an example, the motion of a charged particle in slowly-changing magnetic field is studied and the corresponding phase factor can be interpreted as a holomony of the fiber bundle on the sphare s~2 in the parameter space.