Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9606053 · Physical Review A

Quantum adiabatic approximation and the geometric phase

Ali Mostafazadeh

Published Mar 1, 1997• 63 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A precise definition of an adiabaticity parameter \ensuremath{\nu} of a time-dependent Hamiltonian is proposed. A variation of the time-dependent perturbation theory is presented which yields a series expansion of the evolution operator U(\ensuremath{\tau})=${\ensuremath{\sum}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) with ${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) being at least of the order ${\ensuremath{\nu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$. In particular, ${\mathrm{U}}^{(0)}$(\ensuremath{\tau}) corresponds to the adiabatic approximation and yields Berry's adiabatic phase. It is shown that this series expansion has nothing to do with the 1/\ensuremath{\tau} expansion of U(\ensuremath{\tau}). It is also shown that the nonadiabatic part of the evolution operator is generated by a transformed Hamiltonian which is off-diagonal in the eigenbasis of the initial Hamiltonian. This suggests the introduction of an adiabatic product expansion for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) which turns out to yield exact expressions for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) for a large number of quantum systems. In particular, a simple application of the adiabatic product expansion is used to show that for the Hamiltonian describing the dynamics of a magnetic dipole in an arbitrarily changing magnetic field, there exists another Hamiltonian with the same eigenvectors for which the Schr\"odinger equation is exactly solvable. Some related issues concerning geometric phases and their physical significance are also discussed.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.55.1653

Related papers

Beyond the quantum adiabatic approximation: Adiabatic perturbation theory

Gustavo Rigolin, Gerardo Ortíz, V. H. Ponce

We introduce a perturbative approach to solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, named adiabatic perturbation theory (APT), whose zeroth-order term is the quantum adiabatic approximation. The small parameter in the power series expansion of the time-dependent wave function is the inverse of the time it takes to drive the system's Hamiltonian from the initial to its final form. We review other standard perturbative and nonperturbative ways of going beyond the adiabatic approximation, extending and finding exact relations among them, and also compare the efficiency of those methods against the APT. Most importantly, we determine APT corrections to the Berry phase by use of the Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase. We then solve several time-dependent problems, allowing us to illustrate that the APT is the only perturbative method that gives the right corrections to the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we propose an experiment to measure the APT corrections to the Berry phase and show, for a particular spin-$1∕2$ problem, that to first order in APT the geometric phase should be two and a half times the (adiabatic) Berry phase.

arXiv:0807.1363•Physical Review A•Nov 18, 2008•133 citations

Adiabatic Product Expansion

Alí Mostafazadeh

The time-evolution operator for an explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian is expressed as the product of a sequence of unitary operators. These are obtained by successive time-dependent unitary transformations of the Hilbert space followed by the adiabatic approximation at each step. The resulting adiabatic product expansion yields a generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation. Furthermore, it leads to an infinite class of exactly solvable models. PACS number: 03.65.Bz Consider the dynamics of a quantum mechanical system whose Hamiltonian H = H(τ) is explicitly time-dependent. The evolution of a state vector |ψ(τ) 〉 is governed by the Schrödinger equation: i¯h | ˙ ψ(τ) 〉 = H(τ) |ψ(τ) 〉 , |ψ(0) 〉 = |ψ0 〉 , (1) where a dot means a time-derivative. Alternatively, one has |ψ(τ) 〉 = U(τ)|ψ0〉, where i τ − H(t) dt U(τ) = T e ¯h 0 (2) is the time-evolution operator. Here T denotes the time-ordering operator. The purpose of this article is to express U(τ) as the product of a sequence of unitary operators each of

•Jan 1, 1996•4 citations

Degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory: Foundations and applications

Gustavo Rigolin, Gerardo Ortíz

We present details and expand on the framework leading to the recently introduced degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory [Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170406 (2010)], and on the formulation of the degenerate adiabatic theorem, along with its necessary and sufficient conditions [given in Phys. Rev. A 85, 062111 (2012)]. We start with the adiabatic approximation for degenerate Hamiltonians that paves the way to a clear and rigorous statement of the associated degenerate adiabatic theorem, where the non-Abelian geometric phase (Wilczek-Zee phase) plays a central role to its quantitative formulation. We then describe the degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory, whose zeroth-order term is the degenerate adiabatic approximation, in its full generality. The parameter in the perturbative power-series expansion of the time-dependent wave function is directly associated to the inverse of the time it takes to drive the system from its initial to its final state. With the aid of the degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory we obtain rigorous necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics. Finally, to illustrate the power and wide scope of the methodology, we apply the framework to a degenerate Hamiltonian, whose closed-form time-dependent wave function is derived exactly, and also to other nonexactly solvable Hamiltonians whose solutions are numerically computed.

arXiv:1403.6132•Physical Review A•Aug 6, 2014•23 citations

Test of quantum adiabatic approximation via exactly-solvable dynamics of high-spin precession

Chang-Pu Sun, Lin-Zhi Zhang

By invoking the Rabi rotation technique, the Schrödinger wavefunction of a neutral particle with a magnetic moment and a high-spin is exactly solved in a harmonically-changing magnetic field. This result is then applied to illustrate what the accuracy of the quantum adiabatic approximation is exactly and how the non-adiabatic transition vanishes in accompaniment with the appearence of Berry's geometrical phase. The discussion of this paper verifies C. N. Yang's point of view about the generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation in connection with Berry's phase.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1995•6 citations

A study on Berry's geometric phase and the dual Aharonov-Bohm effect

Cássio Cecato Favarato

In this work, we make a review of the literature that the so-called Berry’s geometric phase. A recent issue, which has been employed in various areas of physics. For this, we use, in a number of references, in which many were critical to the theoretical foundation of this work. At first, we focus on the study of the time evolution of quantum systems governed by Hamiltonians operators whose time dependence is manifested by a set of parameters called classical fields. The adiabatic approximation, is justified mathematically when demonstrated the adiabatic theorem. Under these conditions, we obtain geometric phases - Berry’s phase - associated with these systems in different representations, each displaying its particularity. Finally, as a particular case of geometric phase, we studi from the viewpoint of duality transformations of Maxwell’s equations, the dual Aharonov-Bohm effect, extracting the geometric Berry’s phase associated with the dynamics of the magnetic monopole in the presence of the electric vector potential

•Nov 28, 2014•0 citations

Generalized adiabatic product expansion: A nonperturbative method of solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

Ali Mostafazadeh

We outline a method based on successive canonical transformations which yields a product expansion for the evolution operator of a general (possibly non-Hermitian) Hamiltonian. For a class of such Hamiltonians this expansion involves a finite number of terms, and our method gives the exact solution of the corresponding time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We apply this method to study the dynamics of a general nondegenerate two-level quantum system, a time-dependent classical harmonic oscillator, and a degenerate system consisting of a spin 1 particle interacting with a time-dependent electric field E⃗(t) through the Stark Hamiltonian H=λ(J⃗⋅E⃗)2.

arXiv:quant-ph/9904026•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 1999•12 citations
A precise definition of an adiabaticity parameter \ensuremath{\nu} of a time-dependent Hamiltonian is proposed. A variation of the time-dependent perturbation theory is presented which yields a series expansion of the evolution operator U(\ensuremath{\tau})={\ensuremath{\sum}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}$${\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}(\ensuremath{\tau}) with U(\ensuremathℓ){\mathrm{U}}^{(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}})}U(\ensuremathℓ)(\ensuremath{\tau}) being at least of the order \ensuremathν\ensuremathℓ{\ensuremath{\nu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\ell}}}\ensuremathν\ensuremathℓ. In particular, U(0){\mathrm{U}}^{(0)}U(0)(\ensuremath{\tau}) corresponds to the adiabatic approximation and yields Berry's adiabatic phase. It is shown that this series expansion has nothing to do with the 1/\ensuremath{\tau} expansion of U(\ensuremath{\tau}). It is also shown that the nonadiabatic part of the evolution operator is generated by a transformed Hamiltonian which is off-diagonal in the eigenbasis of the initial Hamiltonian. This suggests the introduction of an adiabatic product expansion for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) which turns out to yield exact expressions for U(\ensuremath{\tau}) for a large number of quantum systems. In particular, a simple application of the adiabatic product expansion is used to show that for the Hamiltonian describing the dynamics of a magnetic dipole in an arbitrarily changing magnetic field, there exists another Hamiltonian with the same eigenvectors for which the Schr"odinger equation is exactly solvable. Some related issues concerning geometric phases and their physical significance are also discussed.
We introduce a perturbative approach to solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, named adiabatic perturbation theory (APT), whose zeroth-order term is the quantum adiabatic approximation. The small parameter in the power series expansion of the time-dependent wave function is the inverse of the time it takes to drive the system's Hamiltonian from the initial to its final form. We review other standard perturbative and nonperturbative ways of going beyond the adiabatic approximation, extending and finding exact relations among them, and also compare the efficiency of those methods against the APT. Most importantly, we determine APT corrections to the Berry phase by use of the Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase. We then solve several time-dependent problems, allowing us to illustrate that the APT is the only perturbative method that gives the right corrections to the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we propose an experiment to measure the APT corrections to the Berry phase and show, for a particular spin-1∕21∕21∕2 problem, that to first order in APT the geometric phase should be two and a half times the (adiabatic) Berry phase.
The time-evolution operator for an explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian is expressed as the product of a sequence of unitary operators. These are obtained by successive time-dependent unitary transformations of the Hilbert space followed by the adiabatic approximation at each step. The resulting adiabatic product expansion yields a generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation. Furthermore, it leads to an infinite class of exactly solvable models. PACS number: 03.65.Bz Consider the dynamics of a quantum mechanical system whose Hamiltonian H = H(τ) is explicitly time-dependent. The evolution of a state vector |ψ(τ) 〉 is governed by the Schrödinger equation: i¯h | ˙ ψ(τ) 〉 = H(τ) |ψ(τ) 〉 , |ψ(0) 〉 = |ψ0 〉 , (1) where a dot means a time-derivative. Alternatively, one has |ψ(τ) 〉 = U(τ)|ψ0〉, where i τ − H(t) dt U(τ) = T e ¯h 0 (2) is the time-evolution operator. Here T denotes the time-ordering operator. The purpose of this article is to express U(τ) as the product of a sequence of unitary operators each of
We present details and expand on the framework leading to the recently introduced degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory [Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170406 (2010)], and on the formulation of the degenerate adiabatic theorem, along with its necessary and sufficient conditions [given in Phys. Rev. A 85, 062111 (2012)]. We start with the adiabatic approximation for degenerate Hamiltonians that paves the way to a clear and rigorous statement of the associated degenerate adiabatic theorem, where the non-Abelian geometric phase (Wilczek-Zee phase) plays a central role to its quantitative formulation. We then describe the degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory, whose zeroth-order term is the degenerate adiabatic approximation, in its full generality. The parameter in the perturbative power-series expansion of the time-dependent wave function is directly associated to the inverse of the time it takes to drive the system from its initial to its final state. With the aid of the degenerate adiabatic perturbation theory we obtain rigorous necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics. Finally, to illustrate the power and wide scope of the methodology, we apply the framework to a degenerate Hamiltonian, whose closed-form time-dependent wave function is derived exactly, and also to other nonexactly solvable Hamiltonians whose solutions are numerically computed.
By invoking the Rabi rotation technique, the Schrödinger wavefunction of a neutral particle with a magnetic moment and a high-spin is exactly solved in a harmonically-changing magnetic field. This result is then applied to illustrate what the accuracy of the quantum adiabatic approximation is exactly and how the non-adiabatic transition vanishes in accompaniment with the appearence of Berry's geometrical phase. The discussion of this paper verifies C. N. Yang's point of view about the generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation in connection with Berry's phase.
In this work, we make a review of the literature that the so-called Berry’s geometric phase. A recent issue, which has been employed in various areas of physics. For this, we use, in a number of references, in which many were critical to the theoretical foundation of this work. At first, we focus on the study of the time evolution of quantum systems governed by Hamiltonians operators whose time dependence is manifested by a set of parameters called classical fields. The adiabatic approximation, is justified mathematically when demonstrated the adiabatic theorem. Under these conditions, we obtain geometric phases - Berry’s phase - associated with these systems in different representations, each displaying its particularity. Finally, as a particular case of geometric phase, we studi from the viewpoint of duality transformations of Maxwell’s equations, the dual Aharonov-Bohm effect, extracting the geometric Berry’s phase associated with the dynamics of the magnetic monopole in the presence of the electric vector potential
We outline a method based on successive canonical transformations which yields a product expansion for the evolution operator of a general (possibly non-Hermitian) Hamiltonian. For a class of such Hamiltonians this expansion involves a finite number of terms, and our method gives the exact solution of the corresponding time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We apply this method to study the dynamics of a general nondegenerate two-level quantum system, a time-dependent classical harmonic oscillator, and a degenerate system consisting of a spin 1 particle interacting with a time-dependent electric field E⃗(t) through the Stark Hamiltonian H=λ(J⃗⋅E⃗)2.