We investigate Euler-type local momentum conservation laws valid for various stochastic phase - space processes. The involved pressure contribution notoriously appears in a characteristic functional form $\\pm \\overrightarrow{\\nabla} [ 2d^2(t) \\frac{\\triangle \\rho ^{1/2}}{\\rho ^{1/2}}]$ which stays in close affinity with the quantum mechanical notion of the de Broglie - Bohm potential and its role in the hydrodynamical formulation of quantum dynamics.
We investigate Euler-type local momentum conservation laws valid for various stochastic phase - space processes. The involved pressure contribution notoriously appears in a characteristic functional form pmoverrightarrownabla[2d2(t)fractrianglerho1/2rho1/2] which stays in close affinity with the quantum mechanical notion of the de Broglie - Bohm potential and its role in the hydrodynamical formulation of quantum dynamics.
In the stochastic electrodynamics, various quantum effects on particles are supposed to emerge from the interactions of the particles with the fluctuating background field. We have adopted the same supposition and further supposed that the quantum potential arises from the velocity fluctuations of particles around their local averages. Based on these suppositions we have derived the expression of the quantum potential in the framework of de Broglie–Bohm theory, which is a reformulation of Schrödinger’s. Thus we are allowed to use the wave functions and Schrödinger operators explicitly so that we have been able to derive the quantum potential in simpler and more compact manner as compared with the stochastic electrodynamics’s. A new hydrodynamical version of Schrödinger equation is also presented, which has been found in the course of our study.
Quantum liquids in two dimensions represent interesting dynamical quantum systems for several reasons, among them the possibility of the existence of infinite hidden symmetries, such as conformal symmetry or the symmetry associated with area preserving diffeomorphisms. It is known that when the symmetry algebra is large enough, symmetry may fully prescribe the dynamics. However, the way this is borne out in two-dimensional hydrodynamics, both classical and quantum, is not fully understood. Here we take a step towards clarifying this issue, by focusing on a particular example, namely that of a two-dimensional phase space liquid which emerges when one considers the Calogero model, a many-body one-dimensional system interacting through an inverse square law potential. We demonstrate how the symmetry algebra of conserved quantities of the one-dimensional system is expressed in terms of the incompressible Euler hydrodynamics of point vortices in phase space. Due to a formal relation between quantum hydrodynamics and classical stochastic hydrodynamics, which is inherent in the method of stochastic quantization, the ideas and methods developed here may also have application in the study of stochastic classical hydrodynamics, after suitable modifications.
Classical statistical equilibrium appears to be based on a no-flow situation with a balance of pressure (including -dV/dx in the case of a potential present). It may be noted, however, that like quantum mechanics, a single particle has different probabilities of being at one x versus another. Furthermore, the Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions may be obtained using reaction balance which is linked to conservation of energy i.e. g(f(ei))g(f(ej)) = g(f(el))g(f(ek)) where ei+ej=el+ei=e. Taking ln of the former expression and linking to the latter yields f(ei), the probability distribution. g=1 for the MB case, f(e)/(1-f(ei)) for the FD and f(e)/(1+f(ei)) for the BE. In classical mechanics, one has the conservation equation: p(x)*p(x)/2m + V(x) = E. In quantum bound systems one has: KE(ave)(x) + V(x) = E which appears to be very similar, although it is based on ensemble averages and there is a momentum distribution P(p/x) at each x. A question which arises is: What is the “conservation of energy” equation for a particular p of the P(p/x) distribution? In this note, we argue the “potential” term associated with a component p*p/2m is related to the part of the potential which contributes to the “creation” of p. In particular, we consider V(x)= Sum over k V(k) exp(ikx) where each k term renders a kick of momentum k. One may create a momentum p using k and p-k for each value of k. We further argue that: p*p/2m P(p/x) + contributing portion of V(x) = E P(p/x) ((1)) for all p. Thus, in quantum equilibrium, which involves a flow, there is a “constant E” type of equation i.e. ((1)), different in form but similar in idea, to that of classical statistical mechanical equilibrium. In previous notes, we referred to this as cycling, but in this note we wish to consider it in terms of dynamics. We further note that in both classical statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics, the energy-probability p equation makes use of the overall average energy which is bT for the classical case and E for the quantum. (b is constant)
The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64
This paper is intended to provide the reader with a review of the authors’ latest results dealing with the modeling of quantum dissipation/diffusion effects at the level of Schrodinger systems, in connection with the corresponding phase space and fluid formulations of such kind of phenomena, especially in what concerns the role of the Fokker–Planck mechanism in the description of open quantum systems and the macroscopic dynamics associated with some viscous hydrodynamic models of Euler and Navier–Stokes type.
In the literature, stochastic approaches employed to derive the Schrodinger equation seem to focus on the idea of a classical spatial density which depends on time and space ie. density(x,t). As a result, d/dt (partial) density appears in various equations such as the continuity and Focker Planck equations. At one point in the derivation the quantum wavefunction is introduced “mathematically” as W(x,t)=sqrt(density(x,t)) exp(i S(x,t)) where S is related to a velocity field through u(x,t)=velocity= d/dx S. From quantum mechanics, -Et becomes a term of S the velocity field. The stochastic/hydrodynamical approaches employ the term du/dt partial = d/dt (partial) d/dx S and then “pull out”” d/dx leaving d/dt (partial) S which yields -E average energy from the -Et term. In this note we argue that for a bound quantum state density(x) so d/dt (partial) density = 0, yet the statistical ideas of quantum mechanics should be present in such a case. Furthermore for the free particle wavefunction exp(ipx-iEt), density=1. In fact, the Schrodinger equation should follow for a free particle even the case of density=1. Stochastic processes seem to be based on equations which consider a change in classical spatial density at a point x in time due to flow in or out or stochastic changes. Quantum processes seem to deal with periodic probability changes from one dimension to another exp(ipx) (2 dimensions) which are somehow related to a physical process of momentum flow. Ultimately one links this process to an energy conservation which does not seem to be the same as a classical stochastic/hydrodynamical approach. In this note we argue that a free particle with a constant momentum p has periodic stochastic processes associated with it through its complex probability change in the region of its wavelength, but that these are linked to creating the momentum p. Furthermore momentum is linked to energy so we argue that the Schrodinger equation is a stochastic equation linking energy and momentum and that time and space are separated i.e. there is no situation of following a change in spatial density in time for a free particle with momentum p. For a bound state, one has a distribution of free particles, but again time is removed from the problem in the sense that it only appears in exp(-iEt) in the wavefunction to again establish a relationship between energy and average momentum and potential. There is again no nonzero d/dt (partial) density term which seems to be key in stochastic equations. Only if one takes a linear combination of energy eigenstates Sum over En an(En) exp(-iEnt) Wn(x) does one obtain the form density(x,t), but we argue that quantum features should already appear in exp(ipx) and the bound state scenario with a zero d/dt (partial) density(x,t). We argue, however, that the Schrodinger equation and fundamental stochastic ideas of quantum mechanics should already be present at the level of exp(ipx).