Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Deterrents to a Theory of Quantum Gravity

Rabinowitz, M

Published Aug 18, 2006• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

As shown in my previous paper, quantum mechanics (QM) directly violates the weak equivalence principle (WEP) in general, and thus indirectly violates the strong equivalence principle (SEP) in all dimensions. The present paper shows that quantum mechanics also directly violates the SEP unless it is arbitrarily abetted in hindsight. Vital domains are shown to exist in which quantum gravity would be non-applicable. There are classical subtleties in which the SEP appears to be violated, but is not. Neutron free fall interference experiments in a gravitational field are examined, as is Galileo's falling body assertion and the misconception it leads to.

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and the Weak Equivalence Principle

Stella Huérfano, Sarira Sahu, M. Socolovsky

We use the Feynman path integral approach to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics twofold. First, we derive the lagrangian for a spinless particle moving in a uniformly but not necessarily constantly accelerated reference frame; then, applying the strong equivalence principle (SEP) we obtain the Schroedinger equation for a particle in an inertial frame and in the presence of a uniform and constant gravity field. Second, using the associated Feynman propagator, we propagate an initial gaussian wave packet, with the final wave function and probability density depending on the ratio m/hbar, where m is the inertial mass of the particle, thus exhibiting the fact that the weak equivalence principle (WEP) is violated by quantum mechanics. Although due to rapid oscillations the wave function does not exist in the classical limit, the probability density is well defined and mass independent when hbar goes to 0, showing the recovery of the WEP. Finally, at the quantum level, a heavier particle does not necessarily falls faster than a lighter one; this depends on the relations between the initial and final common positions and times of the particles.

arXiv:quant-ph/0606172•Jun 20, 2006•4 citations

Strong quantum violation of the gravitational weak equivalence principle by a non-Gaussian wave packet

P Chowdhury, D Home, A S Majumdar +3 more

The weak equivalence principle of gravity is examined at the quantum level in two ways.First, the position detection probabilities of particles described by a non-Gaussian wave packet projected upwards against gravity around the classical turning point and also around the point of initial projection are calculated.These probabilities exhibit mass dependence at both these points, thereby reflecting the quantum violation of the weak equivalence principle.Second, the mean arrival time of freely falling particles is calculated using the quantum probability current, which also turns out to be mass dependent.Such a mass dependence is shown to be enhanced by increasing the non-Gaussianity parameter of the wave packet, thus signifying a stronger violation of the weak equivalence principle through a greater departure from Gaussianity of the initial wave packet.The mass dependence of both the position detection probabilities and the mean arrival time vanishes in the limit of large mass.Thus, compatibility between the weak equivalence principle and quantum mechanics is recovered in the macroscopic limit of the latter.A selection of Bohm trajectories is exhibited to illustrate these features in the free fall case.

arXiv:1107.5159•Classical and Quantum Gravity•Dec 23, 2011•15 citations

Testing the equivalence principle with atomic interferometry

Sven Herrmann, Hansjörg Dittus, Cláus Lämmerzahl +1 more

The weak equivalence principle (WEP), that is, the universality of free fall, states that all point-like neutral particles in a gravitational field fall in the same way. This is the basis of the geometrization of the gravitational interaction. Together with further requirements on the behavior of point particles, light propagation and clocks one can show that gravity is modeled by a Riemannian geometry. Since in the quantum domain all objects are extended, it is not clear whether the notion of a WEP in the quantum domain makes sense at all. We show that for matter wave interferometry the notion of WEP still can be given a meaning. We give a short overview over schemes which allows a violation of the WEP and emphasize that there are also schemes which show that there might be violations of the WEP in the quantum regime which are not present classically. This makes a test of the WEP with quantum matter necessary. We also give a brief outline of the efforts made for testing the WEP with interferometry with cold atoms in the Bremen drop tower carried out by the QUANTUS and PRIMUS collaboration.

Classical and Quantum Gravity•Aug 15, 2012•57 citations

Quantum mechanics and the equivalence principle

P. C. W. Davies

A quantum particle moving in a gravitational field may penetrate the classically forbidden region of the gravitational potential. This raises the question of whether the time of flight of a quantum particle in a gravitational field might deviate systematically from that of a classical particle due to tunnelling delay, representing a violation of the weak equivalence principle. I investigate this using a model quantum clock to measure the time of flight of a quantum particle in a uniform gravitational field, and show that a violation of the equivalence principle does not occur when the measurement is made far from the turning point of the classical trajectory. I conclude with some remarks about the strong equivalence principle in quantum mechanics.

•Jan 1, 2004•31 citations

Quantum free-fall motion and quantum violation of the weak equivalence principle

Philip Caesar Flores, Eric A. Galapon

The weak equivalence principle (WEP) in the quantum regime has been the subject of many studies with a broad range of approaches to the problem. Here, we tackle the problem anew through the time of arrival (TOA) operator approach. This is done by constructing the TOA operator for a nonrelativistic and structureless particle that is projected upward in a uniform gravitational field with an intended arrival point below the classical turning point. The TOA operator is constructed under the constraint that the inertial and gravitational masses are equivalent and that Galilean invariance is preserved. These constraints are implemented by Weyl quantization of the corresponding classical TOA function for the projectile. The expectation value of the TOA operator is explicitly shown to be equal to the classical time of arrival plus mass-dependent quantum correction terms, implying incompatibility of the WEP with quantum mechanics. The full extent of the violation of the WEP is shown through the mass dependence of TOA distribution for the projectile.

arXiv:1808.02646•Physical Review A•Apr 17, 2019•16 citations

Quantum coupling between gravity and mass in bouncing ball dynamics

A. Feoli, Elmo Benedetto, Fabiano Feleppa

Abstract We review the dynamics of a bouncing ball, both from the classical and the quantum points of view, studying the role of its inertial and gravitational masses. We analyze the behavior of quantum particles of different masses, embedded in a uniform gravitational field. We show that the bouncing ball is a useful didactic example to show that the coupling between rest mass and gravity cannot be avoided at the quantum level and that the equivalence principle must be reformulated in quantum mechanics. Galileo’s experiment of falling bodies can be still satisfied if one considers only the average quantum values of observables.

European Journal of Physics•Nov 15, 2018•5 citations
As shown in my previous paper, quantum mechanics (QM) directly violates the weak equivalence principle (WEP) in general, and thus indirectly violates the strong equivalence principle (SEP) in all dimensions. The present paper shows that quantum mechanics also directly violates the SEP unless it is arbitrarily abetted in hindsight. Vital domains are shown to exist in which quantum gravity would be non-applicable. There are classical subtleties in which the SEP appears to be violated, but is not. Neutron free fall interference experiments in a gravitational field are examined, as is Galileo's falling body assertion and the misconception it leads to.
We use the Feynman path integral approach to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics twofold. First, we derive the lagrangian for a spinless particle moving in a uniformly but not necessarily constantly accelerated reference frame; then, applying the strong equivalence principle (SEP) we obtain the Schroedinger equation for a particle in an inertial frame and in the presence of a uniform and constant gravity field. Second, using the associated Feynman propagator, we propagate an initial gaussian wave packet, with the final wave function and probability density depending on the ratio m/hbar, where m is the inertial mass of the particle, thus exhibiting the fact that the weak equivalence principle (WEP) is violated by quantum mechanics. Although due to rapid oscillations the wave function does not exist in the classical limit, the probability density is well defined and mass independent when hbar goes to 0, showing the recovery of the WEP. Finally, at the quantum level, a heavier particle does not necessarily falls faster than a lighter one; this depends on the relations between the initial and final common positions and times of the particles.
The weak equivalence principle of gravity is examined at the quantum level in two ways.First, the position detection probabilities of particles described by a non-Gaussian wave packet projected upwards against gravity around the classical turning point and also around the point of initial projection are calculated.These probabilities exhibit mass dependence at both these points, thereby reflecting the quantum violation of the weak equivalence principle.Second, the mean arrival time of freely falling particles is calculated using the quantum probability current, which also turns out to be mass dependent.Such a mass dependence is shown to be enhanced by increasing the non-Gaussianity parameter of the wave packet, thus signifying a stronger violation of the weak equivalence principle through a greater departure from Gaussianity of the initial wave packet.The mass dependence of both the position detection probabilities and the mean arrival time vanishes in the limit of large mass.Thus, compatibility between the weak equivalence principle and quantum mechanics is recovered in the macroscopic limit of the latter.A selection of Bohm trajectories is exhibited to illustrate these features in the free fall case.
The weak equivalence principle (WEP), that is, the universality of free fall, states that all point-like neutral particles in a gravitational field fall in the same way. This is the basis of the geometrization of the gravitational interaction. Together with further requirements on the behavior of point particles, light propagation and clocks one can show that gravity is modeled by a Riemannian geometry. Since in the quantum domain all objects are extended, it is not clear whether the notion of a WEP in the quantum domain makes sense at all. We show that for matter wave interferometry the notion of WEP still can be given a meaning. We give a short overview over schemes which allows a violation of the WEP and emphasize that there are also schemes which show that there might be violations of the WEP in the quantum regime which are not present classically. This makes a test of the WEP with quantum matter necessary. We also give a brief outline of the efforts made for testing the WEP with interferometry with cold atoms in the Bremen drop tower carried out by the QUANTUS and PRIMUS collaboration.
A quantum particle moving in a gravitational field may penetrate the classically forbidden region of the gravitational potential. This raises the question of whether the time of flight of a quantum particle in a gravitational field might deviate systematically from that of a classical particle due to tunnelling delay, representing a violation of the weak equivalence principle. I investigate this using a model quantum clock to measure the time of flight of a quantum particle in a uniform gravitational field, and show that a violation of the equivalence principle does not occur when the measurement is made far from the turning point of the classical trajectory. I conclude with some remarks about the strong equivalence principle in quantum mechanics.
The weak equivalence principle (WEP) in the quantum regime has been the subject of many studies with a broad range of approaches to the problem. Here, we tackle the problem anew through the time of arrival (TOA) operator approach. This is done by constructing the TOA operator for a nonrelativistic and structureless particle that is projected upward in a uniform gravitational field with an intended arrival point below the classical turning point. The TOA operator is constructed under the constraint that the inertial and gravitational masses are equivalent and that Galilean invariance is preserved. These constraints are implemented by Weyl quantization of the corresponding classical TOA function for the projectile. The expectation value of the TOA operator is explicitly shown to be equal to the classical time of arrival plus mass-dependent quantum correction terms, implying incompatibility of the WEP with quantum mechanics. The full extent of the violation of the WEP is shown through the mass dependence of TOA distribution for the projectile.
Abstract We review the dynamics of a bouncing ball, both from the classical and the quantum points of view, studying the role of its inertial and gravitational masses. We analyze the behavior of quantum particles of different masses, embedded in a uniform gravitational field. We show that the bouncing ball is a useful didactic example to show that the coupling between rest mass and gravity cannot be avoided at the quantum level and that the equivalence principle must be reformulated in quantum mechanics. Galileo’s experiment of falling bodies can be still satisfied if one considers only the average quantum values of observables.