Abstract We review the dynamics of a bouncing ball, both from the classical and the quantum points of view, studying the role of its inertial and gravitational masses. We analyze the behavior of quantum particles of different masses, embedded in a uniform gravitational field. We show that the bouncing ball is a useful didactic example to show that the coupling between rest mass and gravity cannot be avoided at the quantum level and that the equivalence principle must be reformulated in quantum mechanics. Galileo’s experiment of falling bodies can be still satisfied if one considers only the average quantum values of observables.
Abstract We review the dynamics of a bouncing ball, both from the classical and the quantum points of view, studying the role of its inertial and gravitational masses. We analyze the behavior of quantum particles of different masses, embedded in a uniform gravitational field. We show that the bouncing ball is a useful didactic example to show that the coupling between rest mass and gravity cannot be avoided at the quantum level and that the equivalence principle must be reformulated in quantum mechanics. Galileo’s experiment of falling bodies can be still satisfied if one considers only the average quantum values of observables.
We analyze the problem of one dimensional quantum particle falling in a constant gravitational field, also known as the {\it bouncing ball}, employing a semiclassical approach known as momentous effective quantum mechanics. In this formalism the quantum evolution is described through a dynamical system of infinite dimension for the position, the momentum and all dispersions. Usually the system is truncated to have a finite dimensional one, however, in this case equations of motion decouple and the system can be solved. For a specific set of initial conditions we find that the time dependent dispersion in position is always around the classical trajectory.
Abstract We analyze the problem of a quantum particle falling under the influence of a one-dimensional constant gravitational field, also known as the bouncing ball , employing a semiclassical approach for the effective equations of motion for the quantum system. In this formalism, the quantum evolution is described through a dynamical system of infinite dimensions for the position, the momentum, and all dispersions. Usually, the system is truncated to reduce it to a finite-dimensional one; however, in this case, equations of motion decouple and the system can be solved exactly. For a specific set of initial conditions, we find that the time-dependent dispersion in position follows the classical trajectory; however, for large times, it grows enough to allow a non-classical behavior for the rebounds. We also propose the study of an effective potential in terms of a pair of canonical variables for dispersions.
We address the problem of estimating the mass of a (quantum) particle interacting with a classical gravitational field. In particular, we analyze in details the ultimate bounds to precision imposed by quantum mechanics and study the effects of gravity in a variety of settings. Our results show that the presence of a gravitational field generally leads to a precision gain, which can be significant in a regime half-way between the quantum and classical domains. We also address quantum enhancement to precision, i.e. the advantages coming from taking into account the quantum nature of the probe particle, and show that non-classicality is indeed a relevant resource for mass estimation. In particular, we suggest schemes for mass-sensing measurements using quantum probes and show that upon employing non-classical states like quantum coherent superpositions one may improve precisions by orders of magnitude. In addition, we discuss the compatibility of the weak equivalence principle (WEP) within the quantum regime using as a guide the notion of Fisher Information. We find that the information on the probe's mass that can be extracted through position measurements is unchanged by turning on a uniform gravitational field. This conclusion is somehow at variance with certain views expressed in the literature that the WEP cannot hold in the quantum regime. In fact, our results show that in an information-theoretic framework, no clash occurs between quantum mechanics and the WEP.
As shown in my previous paper, quantum mechanics (QM) directly violates the weak equivalence principle (WEP) in general, and thus indirectly violates the strong equivalence principle (SEP) in all dimensions. The present paper shows that quantum mechanics also directly violates the SEP unless it is arbitrarily abetted in hindsight. Vital domains are shown to exist in which quantum gravity would be non-applicable. There are classical subtleties in which the SEP appears to be violated, but is not. Neutron free fall interference experiments in a gravitational field are examined, as is Galileo's falling body assertion and the misconception it leads to.
We started to investigate quantum mechanics by considering only the quantization of magnetic arrows. In our explorations we found out that the magnetic arrow had some funny properties (for example, it was possible that m x did not have a definite value), but at first it seemed that other properties, such as the position of an atom, behaved in the familiar classical way. Eventually (section 9.3) we found that it was also possible to have an atom without a definite value for its position. In this chapter, we investigate what happens when we apply quantum mechanics to a particle's position. Ball bouncing from a floor This chapter will show our framework for quantum mechanics in action, by applying it to the problem of a ball bouncing from a floor. Let us use a very fast ball, such as an electron, so that we can ignore the force of gravity. (We restrict ourselves to an electron that is moving fast on a human scale but slow compared to the speed of light, so that relativistic considerations don't come into play. Also, the magnetic arrow associated with the electron has no effect on the phenomena described in this chapter, so I won't mention it again.) Imagine a source of balls that could send a ball flying in any direction, for example a hot tungsten filament that boils off electrons. Suppose a ball begins at point P , bounces off the floor, and ends up at point Q . (Points P and Q are equally distant from the floor.
Investigation into the applicability of the equivalence principle in quantum mechanics has taken many forms, with varying conclusions. Here, a dynamical semiclassical description of a wave packet in terms of its center of mass and higher quantum fluctuations is applied to the case of a quantum particle in gravitational free fall. The analysis provides an intuitive account of the origin of mass dependence in quantum-gravitational dynamics through an effective potential that enforces the uncertainty principle. This potential has two implications: (i) The lowest order quantum fluctuations encoding the width and spreading of the wave packet obey an uncertainty relation whose observance is mass dependent. (ii) In an inhomogeneous gravitational field tidal effects couple the center of mass motion to the quantum fluctuations. The combined effect results in a clear demonstration of how some conceptions of the weak equivalence principle, based on mass dependence, are violated. The size of this violation is within sensitivities of current E\"otv\"os and clock-based return time experiments.