Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bell's theorem without inequalities and without unspeakable information

Cabello, A

Published Sep 27, 2004• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

A proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities is presented in which distant local setups do not need to be aligned, since the required perfect correlations are achieved for any local rotation of the local setups.

Related papers

Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities and without Alignments

Adán Cabello

A proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities is presented which exhibits three remarkable properties: (a). reduced local states are immune to collective decoherence; (b). distant local setups do not need to be aligned, since the required perfect correlations are achieved for any local rotation of the local setups; (c). local measurements require only individual measurements on the qubits. Indeed, it is shown that this proof is essentially the only one which fulfills (a). (b). and (c).

arXiv:quant-ph/0303076•Physical Review Letters•Dec 2, 2003•41 citations

Comment on “Bell's Theorem without Inequalities and without Alignments”

Luca Marinatto

In this Comment we show that Cabello's proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities [Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 230403 (2003)] does not exhibit two of the three "remarkable properties" which the proof is claimed to possess. More precisely it is our purpose to show that property (c) of Cabello's proof, stating that ``local observables can be measured by means of tests on individual qubits" is definitely false since it has been obtained by a wrong use of the basic rules of the quantum formalism, while property (b), stating that ``distant local setups do not need to be aligned since the require perfect correlations are achieved for any local rotation of the setups", is also wrong due to the failure of validity of property (c).

arXiv:quant-ph/0409129•Physical Review Letters•Sep 17, 2004•1 citation

Rotationally invariant proof of Bell’s theorem without inequalities

Adán Cabello

The singlet state of two spin-$\frac{3}{2}$ particles allows a proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities with two distinguishing features: any local observable can be regarded as an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen element of reality, and the contradiction with local realism occurs not only for some specific local observables but for any rotation whereof.

arXiv:quant-ph/0306073•Physical Review A•Mar 18, 2003•6 citations

Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities and without Unspeakable Information

Adán Cabello

arXiv:quant-ph/0409190•Foundations of Physics•Nov 1, 2005•1 citation

Inequality-free proof of Bell's theorem

Andrea Aiello

Bell's theorem supposedly demonstrates an irreconcilable conflict between quantum mechanics and local realistic hidden-variable theories. Most proofs of Bell's theorem, are based on inequalities. In this paper we present an alternative proof which does not involve inequalities, but only a direct comparison between correlation functions calculated using quantum mechanics on the one hand, and those calculated according to local realistic hidden-variable theories on the other. Our proof is based on a physically motivated use of Fourier series for periodic functions, and confirms that local realistic hidden-variable theories are incompatible with quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2410.17912•Physical Review A•Mar 4, 2025•0 citations

Bells theorem without inequalities and only two distant observers

P. K. Aravind

A new proof of Bell’s theorem without inequalities is presented by considering an entangled state of four qubits shared between two observers. A scheme for quantum key distribution based on this proof is also discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0104133•Optical Fiber Communication Conference•Jan 1, 2001•41 citations
In this Comment we show that Cabello's proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities [Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 230403 (2003)] does not exhibit two of the three "remarkable properties" which the proof is claimed to possess. More precisely it is our purpose to show that property (c) of Cabello's proof, stating that ``local observables can be measured by means of tests on individual qubits" is definitely false since it has been obtained by a wrong use of the basic rules of the quantum formalism, while property (b), stating that ``distant local setups do not need to be aligned since the require perfect correlations are achieved for any local rotation of the setups", is also wrong due to the failure of validity of property (c).
The singlet state of two spin-32\frac{3}{2}23​ particles allows a proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities with two distinguishing features: any local observable can be regarded as an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen element of reality, and the contradiction with local realism occurs not only for some specific local observables but for any rotation whereof.
Bell's theorem supposedly demonstrates an irreconcilable conflict between quantum mechanics and local realistic hidden-variable theories. Most proofs of Bell's theorem, are based on inequalities. In this paper we present an alternative proof which does not involve inequalities, but only a direct comparison between correlation functions calculated using quantum mechanics on the one hand, and those calculated according to local realistic hidden-variable theories on the other. Our proof is based on a physically motivated use of Fourier series for periodic functions, and confirms that local realistic hidden-variable theories are incompatible with quantum mechanics.