Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0306073 · Physical Review A

Rotationally invariant proof of Bell’s theorem without inequalities

Adán Cabello

Published Mar 18, 2003• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The singlet state of two spin-$\frac{3}{2}$ particles allows a proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities with two distinguishing features: any local observable can be regarded as an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen element of reality, and the contradiction with local realism occurs not only for some specific local observables but for any rotation whereof.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.67.032107

Related papers

Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories

Lucién Hardy

First, we demonstrate Bell's theorem, without using inequalities, for an experiment with two particles. Then we show that, if we assume realism and we assume that the ``elements of reality'' corresponding to Lorentz-invariant observables are themselves Lorentz invariant, we can derive a contradiction with quantum mechanics.

Physical Review Letters•May 18, 1992•739 citations

Bell theorem without inequalities for two spinless particles

Herbert Joseph Bernstein, Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael Horne +1 more

We use the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger [in Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory,and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989)] approach to present three demonstrations of the failure of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) [Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)] local realism for the case of two spinless particles in a two-particle interferometer. The original EPR assumptions of locality and reality do not suffice for this. First, we use the EPR assumptions of locality and reality to establish that in a two-particle interferometer, the path taken by each particle is an element of reality. Second, we supplement the EPR premises by the postulate that when the path taken by a particle is an element of reality, all paths not taken are empty. We emphasize that our approach is not applicable to a single-particle interferometer because there the path taken by the particle cannot be established as an element of reality. We point out that there are real conceptual differences between single-particle, two-particle, and multiparticle interferometry.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1993•62 citations

Bell Inequalities with a Range of Violation that Does Not Diminish as the Spin Becomes Arbitrarily Large

Anupam Garg, N. David Mermin

Some new, powerful, and very simple Bell inequalities are derived. They establish that for two spin-$s$ particles in the singlet state, the quantum-theoretic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations for spin measurements along all pairs of directions from a set of $N$ axes are incompatible with local realism for any set of distinct coplanar axes when $N=3$, and for any set of distinct axes whatever when $N=4$, with the possible exception of sets restricted by one of the constraints $\stackrel{^}{a}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\stackrel{^}{b}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\stackrel{^}{c}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\stackrel{^}{d}=0$. These results hold for any value of the spin.

Physical Review Letters•Sep 27, 1982•92 citations

Rotationally Invariant Proof of Bell's Theorem Without Inequalities for 4 k -Dimensional ( k = 1,2,...) Systems

Lin-Mei Liang, Cheng-Zu Li

We present rotationally invariant proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities for spin-(2 N +1)/2 system ( N = 2 k −1, k = 1,2,3,4…) with only two particles, which is a generalization of Cabello's study [Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 032107].

Chinese Physics Letters•Dec 1, 2004•0 citations

Rotationally Invariant Proof of Bell＇s Theorem Without Inequalities for 4k-Dimensional （k = 1, 2,...） Systems

梁林梅, 李承祖

We present rotationally invariant proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities for spin-(2N+1)/2system (N = 2k-1,k = 1, 2, 3, 4...) with only two particles, which is a generalization of Cabello's study [Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003)032107].

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Quantum mechanics vs local realism near the classical limit: A Bell inequality for spin s

N. David Mermin

The quantitative quantum-mechanical analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment for correlated particles of arbitrary spin $s$ is shown to contradict a generalized form of Bell's inequality, for suitable orientations of the detectors. As the classical ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) limit is approached, the range of angles for which the contradiction arises vanishes as $\frac{1}{s}$.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jul 15, 1980•171 citations
The singlet state of two spin-32\frac{3}{2}23​ particles allows a proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities with two distinguishing features: any local observable can be regarded as an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen element of reality, and the contradiction with local realism occurs not only for some specific local observables but for any rotation whereof.
We use the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger [in Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory,and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989)] approach to present three demonstrations of the failure of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) [Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)] local realism for the case of two spinless particles in a two-particle interferometer. The original EPR assumptions of locality and reality do not suffice for this. First, we use the EPR assumptions of locality and reality to establish that in a two-particle interferometer, the path taken by each particle is an element of reality. Second, we supplement the EPR premises by the postulate that when the path taken by a particle is an element of reality, all paths not taken are empty. We emphasize that our approach is not applicable to a single-particle interferometer because there the path taken by the particle cannot be established as an element of reality. We point out that there are real conceptual differences between single-particle, two-particle, and multiparticle interferometry.
Some new, powerful, and very simple Bell inequalities are derived. They establish that for two spin-sss particles in the singlet state, the quantum-theoretic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations for spin measurements along all pairs of directions from a set of NNN axes are incompatible with local realism for any set of distinct coplanar axes when N=3N=3N=3, and for any set of distinct axes whatever when N=4N=4N=4, with the possible exception of sets restricted by one of the constraints $\stackrel{^}{a}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\stackrel{^}{b}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\stackrel{^}{c}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\stackrel{^}{d}=0$. These results hold for any value of the spin.
The quantitative quantum-mechanical analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment for correlated particles of arbitrary spin sss is shown to contradict a generalized form of Bell's inequality, for suitable orientations of the detectors. As the classical ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) limit is approached, the range of angles for which the contradiction arises vanishes as 1s\frac{1}{s}s1​.