Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Appearance of Gauge Fields and Forces beyond the adiabatic approximation

Pierre Gosselin, Hervé Mohrbach

Published Oct 20, 2008• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We investigate the origin of quantum geometric phases, gauge fields and forces beyond the adiabatic regime. In particular, we extend the notions of geometric magnetic and electric forces discovered in studies of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation to arbitrary quantum systems described by matrix valued quantum Hamiltonians. The results are illustrated by several physical relevant examples.

Related papers

Appearance of gauge fields and forces beyond the adiabatic approximation

Pierre Gosselin, Hervé Mohrbach

We investigate the origin of quantum geometric phases, gauge fields and forces beyond the adiabatic regime. In particular, we extend the notions of geometric magnetic and electric forces discovered in studies of the Born–Oppenheimer approximation to arbitrary quantum systems described by matrix-valued quantum Hamiltonians. The results are illustrated by several physical relevant examples.

arXiv:0810.3640•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 12, 2010•7 citations

Geometric gauge potentials and forces in low-dimensional scattering systems

Bernard Zygelman

We introduce and analyze several low-dimensional scattering systems that exhibit geometric phase phenomena. The systems are fully solvable and we compare accurate solutions of them with those obtained in a Born-Oppenheimer projection approximation. We illustrate how geometric magnetism manifests in them, and explore the relationship between solutions obtained in the diabatic and adiabatic pictures. We provide an example, involving a neutral atom dressed by an external field, in which the system mimics the behavior of a charged particle that interacts with, and is scattered by, a ferromagnetic material. We also introduce a similar system that exhibits Aharonov-Bohm scattering. We propose possible practical applications. We provide a theoretical approach that underscores universality in the appearance of geometric gauge forces. We do not insist on degeneracies in the adiabatic Hamiltonian, and we posit that the emergence of geometric gauge forces is a consequence of symmetry breaking in the latter.

arXiv:1202.2908•Physical Review A•Oct 9, 2012•14 citations

Adiabatic Approximation for Path Integrals and Geometrical Potentials

Takashi Ohnishi, Naoto Nagaosa

Geometrical concepts have played an important role in quantum mechanics. In the Schrodinger representation, the Berry–Simon connection and the quantum geometric tensor appear as gauge potentials in the effective Hamiltonian for a heavy system under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. On the other hand, the Berry phase should arise as the amplitude of each path in the pathintegral formalism. In their pioneering work, Kuratsuji and Iida have developed the treatment of the Born– Oppenheimer approximation in the path integral quantization, where the Berry phase of the light system naturally appears in the effective action for the heavy system. However, they did not derive the gauge potentials themselves in the effective Hamiltonian. In this short note, we show that the gauge potentials which relate to the geometry of the Hilbert space of the light system are also derived in the adiabatic scheme of path integrals. Our result presents the path-integral formalism to consider the effective dynamics of the heavy system under the adiabatic approximation. Let us consider the following Hamiltonian:

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Dec 25, 2006•2 citations

The temperature dependent geometric phase

Zheng-Chuan Wang

There exists a geometric phase for a quantum state during the adiabatic evolution of the system. If the adiabatic procedure happens between the system and the environment interacting with it similar to Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation, we can introduce a temperature into the environment, which can be regarded as in an equilibrium state. Then a temperature-dependent geometric phase can be obtained for the system, which originates from the Abelian gauge potential induced by the BO approximation. This gauge potential contributes to the effective potential of the system, which is temperature dependent, too. Finally, we demonstrate them using an example of H_2^+ ion system.

quant-pharXiv:2604.26639•Apr 30, 2026•0 citations

The geometric phase and dynamics of electric and magnetic dipoles

Reinaldo da Conceição

In this work, we study the geometric phase and the dynamics of electric and magnetic dipoles. We present your origins, some relevant works in this area as well as your results. The appearance of a geometric phase is explained when a study of quantum dynamics of the particle is made, during a complete cycle and that is subject to cyclic adiabatic processes. The present study begins with an introduction about the geometric phase, where we present examples used to illustrate it. Next, the adiabatic theorem was presented in both classical and quantum systems and a discourse on adiabatic invariants. After this, we present its final mathematical formulation and also its obtaining for a spin 1/2 particle. Soon after, we obtained the Lagrangian and its Hamiltonian, we find the quantum phase that the particle acquired in the efect Aharonov- Bohm and Aharonov - Casher. We have also seen the quantum dynamics of both electric and magnetic dipoles, where we start from the Lagrangian and study its field configurations, we reach the Ananda phase, where in the next step we obtain phases for some of the Field configurations in the Ananda phase from phase of Aharonov - Casher where we made the electric dipole moment equal to zero, as well as the He - Mckellar - Welkens phase with magnetic dipole moment equal to zero, and the Casella efect thus obtaining a particle case of the Ananda phase.

•Jun 27, 2019•0 citations

Classical geometric forces of reaction: an exactly solvable model

Michael Berry, Jonathan M. Robbins

Abstract We illustrate the effects of the classical ‘magnetic’ and ‘electric’ geometric forces that enter into the adiabatic description of the slow motion of a heavy system coupled to a light one, beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation of simple averaging. When the fast system is a spin S and the slow system is a massive particle whose spatial position R is coupled to S with energy (fast hamiltonian) S · R, the magnetic force is that of a monopole of strength I (= adiabatic invariant S · R/R) centred at R = 0, and the electric force is inverse-cube repulsion with strength S2 – I2. Confining the slow particle to the surface of a sphere eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and electric forces, and generates motion with precession and nutation exactly equivalent to that of a heavy symmetrical top. In the adiabatic limit the nutation is small and the averaged precession is precisely reproduced by the magnetic force. Alternatively, choosing the exactly conserved total angular momentum to vanish eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and magnetic forces, and generates as exact orbits a one-parameter family of curly ‘antelope horns’ coiling in from infinity, reversing hand, and receding to infinity. In the adiabatic limit the repulsion of the ‘guiding centre’ of these coils is exactly reproduced by the electric force. A by-product of the ‘antelope horn’ analysis is a determination of the shape of a curve with a given curvature k and torsion T in terms of the evolution of a quantum 2-spinor driven by a planar ‘magnetic field’ with components k and T.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Sep 8, 1993•68 citations
We investigate the origin of quantum geometric phases, gauge fields and forces beyond the adiabatic regime. In particular, we extend the notions of geometric magnetic and electric forces discovered in studies of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation to arbitrary quantum systems described by matrix valued quantum Hamiltonians. The results are illustrated by several physical relevant examples.
We introduce and analyze several low-dimensional scattering systems that exhibit geometric phase phenomena. The systems are fully solvable and we compare accurate solutions of them with those obtained in a Born-Oppenheimer projection approximation. We illustrate how geometric magnetism manifests in them, and explore the relationship between solutions obtained in the diabatic and adiabatic pictures. We provide an example, involving a neutral atom dressed by an external field, in which the system mimics the behavior of a charged particle that interacts with, and is scattered by, a ferromagnetic material. We also introduce a similar system that exhibits Aharonov-Bohm scattering. We propose possible practical applications. We provide a theoretical approach that underscores universality in the appearance of geometric gauge forces. We do not insist on degeneracies in the adiabatic Hamiltonian, and we posit that the emergence of geometric gauge forces is a consequence of symmetry breaking in the latter.
Geometrical concepts have played an important role in quantum mechanics. In the Schrodinger representation, the Berry–Simon connection and the quantum geometric tensor appear as gauge potentials in the effective Hamiltonian for a heavy system under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. On the other hand, the Berry phase should arise as the amplitude of each path in the pathintegral formalism. In their pioneering work, Kuratsuji and Iida have developed the treatment of the Born– Oppenheimer approximation in the path integral quantization, where the Berry phase of the light system naturally appears in the effective action for the heavy system. However, they did not derive the gauge potentials themselves in the effective Hamiltonian. In this short note, we show that the gauge potentials which relate to the geometry of the Hilbert space of the light system are also derived in the adiabatic scheme of path integrals. Our result presents the path-integral formalism to consider the effective dynamics of the heavy system under the adiabatic approximation. Let us consider the following Hamiltonian:
There exists a geometric phase for a quantum state during the adiabatic evolution of the system. If the adiabatic procedure happens between the system and the environment interacting with it similar to Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation, we can introduce a temperature into the environment, which can be regarded as in an equilibrium state. Then a temperature-dependent geometric phase can be obtained for the system, which originates from the Abelian gauge potential induced by the BO approximation. This gauge potential contributes to the effective potential of the system, which is temperature dependent, too. Finally, we demonstrate them using an example of H_2^+ ion system.
In this work, we study the geometric phase and the dynamics of electric and magnetic dipoles. We present your origins, some relevant works in this area as well as your results. The appearance of a geometric phase is explained when a study of quantum dynamics of the particle is made, during a complete cycle and that is subject to cyclic adiabatic processes. The present study begins with an introduction about the geometric phase, where we present examples used to illustrate it. Next, the adiabatic theorem was presented in both classical and quantum systems and a discourse on adiabatic invariants. After this, we present its final mathematical formulation and also its obtaining for a spin 1/2 particle. Soon after, we obtained the Lagrangian and its Hamiltonian, we find the quantum phase that the particle acquired in the efect Aharonov- Bohm and Aharonov - Casher. We have also seen the quantum dynamics of both electric and magnetic dipoles, where we start from the Lagrangian and study its field configurations, we reach the Ananda phase, where in the next step we obtain phases for some of the Field configurations in the Ananda phase from phase of Aharonov - Casher where we made the electric dipole moment equal to zero, as well as the He - Mckellar - Welkens phase with magnetic dipole moment equal to zero, and the Casella efect thus obtaining a particle case of the Ananda phase.
Abstract We illustrate the effects of the classical ‘magnetic’ and ‘electric’ geometric forces that enter into the adiabatic description of the slow motion of a heavy system coupled to a light one, beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation of simple averaging. When the fast system is a spin S and the slow system is a massive particle whose spatial position R is coupled to S with energy (fast hamiltonian) S · R, the magnetic force is that of a monopole of strength I (= adiabatic invariant S · R/R) centred at R = 0, and the electric force is inverse-cube repulsion with strength S2 – I2. Confining the slow particle to the surface of a sphere eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and electric forces, and generates motion with precession and nutation exactly equivalent to that of a heavy symmetrical top. In the adiabatic limit the nutation is small and the averaged precession is precisely reproduced by the magnetic force. Alternatively, choosing the exactly conserved total angular momentum to vanish eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and magnetic forces, and generates as exact orbits a one-parameter family of curly ‘antelope horns’ coiling in from infinity, reversing hand, and receding to infinity. In the adiabatic limit the repulsion of the ‘guiding centre’ of these coils is exactly reproduced by the electric force. A by-product of the ‘antelope horn’ analysis is a determination of the shape of a curve with a given curvature k and torsion T in terms of the evolution of a quantum 2-spinor driven by a planar ‘magnetic field’ with components k and T.