The program of a physical concept of information is outlined in the framework of quantum theory. A proposal is made for how to avoid the introduction of axiomatic observables. The conventional (collapse) and the Everett interpretations of quantum theory may in principle lead to different dynamical consequences. Finally, a formal ensemble description not based on a concept of lacking information is discussed.
The program of a physical concept of information is outlined in the framework of quantum theory. A proposal is made for how to avoid the introduction of axiomatic observables. The conventional (collapse) and the Everett interpretations of quantum theory may in principle lead to different dynamical consequences. Finally, a formal ensemble description not based on a concept of lacking information is discussed.
The central part of Everett's formulation of quantum mechanics is a quantum mechanical model of memory and of observation as the recording of information in a memory. To use this model as an answer to the measurement problem, Everett has to assume that a conscious observer can be in a superposition of such memory states and be unaware of it. This assumption has puzzled generations of readers. The fundamental aim of this dissertation is to find a set of simpler assumptions which are sufficient to show that Everett's model is empirically adequate. I argue that Everett's model needs three assumptions to account for the process of observation: an assumption of decoherence of observers as quantum mechanical systems; an assumption of supervenience of mental states (qualities) over quantum mechanical properties; and an assumption about the interpretation of quantum mechanical states in general: quantum mechanical states describe ensembles of states of affairs coexisting in the same system. I argue that the only plausible understanding of such ensembles is as ensembles of possibilities, and that all standard no-collapse interpretations agree in this reading of quantum mechanical states. Their differences can be understood as different theories about what marks the real state within this ensemble, and Everett's theory as the claim that no additional 'mark of reality' is necessary. Using the three assumptions, I argue that introspection cannot determine the objective quantum mechanical state of an observer. Rather, the introspective qualities of a quantum mechanical state can be represented by a (classical) statistical ensemble of subjective states. An analysis of these subjective states and their dynamics leads to the conclusion that they suffice to give empirically correct predictions. The argument for the empirical adequacy of the subjective state entails that knowledge of the objective quantum mechanical state is impossible in principle. Empirical reality for a conscious observer is not described by the objective state, but by a Everettian relative state conditional on the subjective state, and no theoretical 'mark of reality' is necessary for this concept of reality. I compare the resulting concept of reality to Kant's distinction between empirical and transcendental reality.
The experience from Quantum Information of the last twenty years has lead theorists to look at Quantum Theory and the whole of Physics from a different angle. A new information-theoretic paradigm is emerging, long time ago prophesied by John Archibald Wheeler with his popular coinage 'It from bit'. Theoretical groups are now addressing the problem of deriving Quantum Theory from informational principles, and similar lines are investigated in new approaches to Quantum Gravity. In my talk I will review some recent advances on these lines. The general idea synthesizing the new paradigm is that there is only Quantum Theory (without quantization rules): the whole Physics--including space-time and relativity--is emergent from quantum-information processing. And, since Quantum Theory itself is made with purely informational principles, the whole Physics must be reformulated in information-theoretical terms. The review is divided into the following parts: (a) The informational axiomatization of Quantum Theory; (b) How space-time and relativistic covariance emerge from the quantum computation; (c) What is the information-theoretical meaning of inertial mass and Planck constant, and how the quantum field emerges; (d) Observational consequences: mass-dependent refraction index of vacuum. I then conclude with some possible future research lines.
Existing mainstream quantum interpretations, such as the Copenhagen School's "wave function collapse" and Everett's many-worlds theory, respectively face ontological discontinuity difficulties and ontological redundancy questions. To break through this predicament, this paper presents a completely new quantum mechanics interpretation framework - the "mechanics network interpretation". The framework places "interaction" in ontological priority, arguing that the essence of physical reality is a holistic "mechanical network" composed of interactions. In this image, "particles" are the stable nodes in the network, "waves" are the coordinated dynamic responses of the network, and "information" is the material configuration that carries instructions for specific behavior. The core principle of this paper, the "Channel stability principle," states that quantum measurements are not mysterious collapses, but rather the dynamic results of observation arrangements (strong interactions) sifting out different dominant "channels" on the network: observations of "particleality," destroy coherent channels, while observations of "wave-like," protect or purify coherent channels. This framework provides a continuous, deterministic and physically intuitive explanation for the problems of quantum superposition, entanglement and measurement without the introduction of the "wave function collapse" postulate or an infinitely split universe. The paper applies this framework to key thought experiments (such as the EPR paradox, the Aspe experiment) and the latest empirical studies (such as the USTC optical tweezers atom experiment), showing that quantum nonlocality can be interpreted as an expression of the "overall structure" of the network rather than action at a distance; Quantum-classical transitions result from variations in the precision of network control. By comparing with systems of mainstream interpretations, this paper clarifies the unique value of the new framework in resolving conceptual dualism and returning to realism and continuity. As a "concept-first" research program, the value of this paper lies in providing a self-consistent worldview and a clear conceptual vocabulary, laying the necessary theoretical foundation for the future construction of a strict mathematical formal system and the derivation of novel physical prophecies.
After more than a century since its birth, Quantum Theory still eludes our understanding. If asked to describe it, we have to resort to abstract and ad hoc principles about complex Hilbert spaces. How is it possible that a fundamental physical theory cannot be described using the ordinary language of Physics? Here we offer a contribution to the problem from the angle of Quantum Information, providing a short non-technical presentation of a recent derivation of Quantum Theory from information-theoretic principles. The broad picture emerging from the principles is that Quantum Theory is the only standard theory of information that is compatible with the purity and reversibility of physical processes.
This paper explores the quantum many-worlds interpretation (MWI) and its implications beyond fundamental physics, extending to decision theory, game theory, and economics. Starting from the foundational principles of MWI, we examine how observers interact with branching universes, analyze Newcomb’s paradox in both classical and quantum forms, and discuss applications in quantum game theory and quantum economics. By integrating quantum concepts like superposition, entanglement, and interference, we demonstrate how these ideas resolve classical paradoxes and offer novel frameworks for modeling complex systems. Mathematical formulations are presented using Unicode symbols for clarity. The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, proposed by Hugh Everett III in 1957, posits that the universe branches into multiple parallel realities during quantum measurements, avoiding the wave function collapse postulate. This framework has profound philosophical and practical implications, particularly in understanding decision-making under uncertainty. In this paper, we synthesize discussions on MWI, observer roles in branching, Newcomb’s paradox, its quantum variant, quantum game theory, and quantum economics. These topics form a coherent progression from quantum foundations to applied interdisciplinary fields, highlighting how quantum principles can reshape classical theories.