Schrödinger's equation says that the Hamiltonian is the generator of time translations.This seems to imply that any reasonable definition of time operator must be conjugate to the Hamiltonian.Then both time and energy must have the same spectrum since conjugate operators are unitarily equivalent.Clearly this is not always true: normal Hamiltonians have lower bounded spectrum and often only have discrete eigenvalues, whereas we typically desire that time can take any real value.Pauli concluded that constructing a general a time operator is impossible (although clearly it can be done in specific cases).Here we show how the Pauli argument fails when one uses an external system (a "clock") to track time, so that time arises as correlations between the system and the clock (conditional probability amplitudes framework).In this case, the time operator is conjugate to the clock Hamiltonian and not to the system Hamiltonian, but its eigenvalues still satisfy the Schrödinger equation for arbitrary system Hamiltonians.
Schrödinger's equation says that the Hamiltonian is the generator of time translations.This seems to imply that any reasonable definition of time operator must be conjugate to the Hamiltonian.Then both time and energy must have the same spectrum since conjugate operators are unitarily equivalent.Clearly this is not always true: normal Hamiltonians have lower bounded spectrum and often only have discrete eigenvalues, whereas we typically desire that time can take any real value.Pauli concluded that constructing a general a time operator is impossible (although clearly it can be done in specific cases).Here we show how the Pauli argument fails when one uses an external system (a "clock") to track time, so that time arises as correlations between the system and the clock (conditional probability amplitudes framework).In this case, the time operator is conjugate to the clock Hamiltonian and not to the system Hamiltonian, but its eigenvalues still satisfy the Schrödinger equation for arbitrary system Hamiltonians.
W Pauli pointed out that the existence of a self-adjoint time operator is incompatible with the semi-bounded character of the Hamiltonian spectrum. As a result, there has been much argument about the time–energy uncertainty relation and other related issues. In this paper, we show a way to overcome Pauli's argument. In order to define a time operator, by treating time and space on an equal footing and extending the usual Hamiltonian Ĥ to the generalized Hamiltonian Ĥ μ (with Ĥ 0 = Ĥ), we reconstruct the analytical mechanics and the corresponding quantum (field) theories, which are equivalent to the traditional ones. The generalized Schrödinger equation i∂ μ ψ = Ĥ μ ψ and Heisenberg equation d /d x μ = ∂ μ + i[Ĥ μ , ] are obtained, from which we have: (1) t is to Ĥ 0 as x j is to Ĥ j ( j = 1, 2, 3); likewise, t is to i∂ 0 as x j is to i∂ j ; (2) the proposed time operator is canonically conjugate to i∂ 0 rather than to Ĥ 0 , therefore Pauli's theorem no longer applies; (3) two types of uncertainty relations, the usual Δ x μ Δ p μ ≥ 1/2 and the Mandelstam–Tamm treatment Δ x μ Δ H μ ≥ 1/2, have been formulated.
Pauli's well known theorem (W. Pauli, Hanbuch der Physik vol. 5/1, ed. S. Flugge, (1926) p.60) asserts that the existence of a self-adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a given Hamiltonian implies that the time operator and the Hamitlonian posses completely continuous spectra spanning the entire real line. Thus the conclusion that there exists no self-adjoint time operator conjugate to a Hamiltonian with a spectrum which is a proper subspace of the real line. But we challenge this conclusion. We show rigourously the consitency of assuming a bounded, self-adjoint time operator conjugate to a Hamiltonian with an unbounded, or semibounded, or finitely countable point spectrum. Pauli implicitly assumed unconditionally that the domain of the Hamiltonian is invariant under the action of $U_\\beta=\\exp(-i\\beta T)$, where T is the time operator, for arbitrary real number betaA. But we show that the beta's are at most the differences of the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. And this happens, under some other conditions, when the Hamiltonian has a non-empty point spectrum extending from negative to positive infinity. For a Hamiltonian with a simibounded or finitely countable point spectrum, we show that no $U_\\beta$. We demonstrate our claim by giving an explicit example.
Abstract To admit a canonically conjugate time operator, the Hamiltonian has to be a generator of translations (like the momentum operator generates translations in space), so its spectrum must be unbounded. But the Hamiltonian governing our world is thought to be bounded from below. Also, judging by the number of fields and parameters of the Standard Model, the Hamiltonian seems much more complicated. In this article I give examples of worlds governed by Hamiltonians generating translations. They can be expressed as a partial derivative operator just like the momentum operator, but when expressed in function of other observables they can exhibit any level of complexity. The examples include any quantum world realizing a standard ideal measurement, any quantum world containing a clock or a free massless fermion, the quantum representation of any deterministic time-reversible dynamical system without time loops, and any quantum world that cannot return to a past state. Such worlds are as sophisticated as our world, but they admit a time operator. I show that, despite having unbounded Hamiltonian, they do not decay to infinite negative energy any more than any quantum or classical world. Since two such quantum systems of the same Hilbert space dimension are unitarily equivalent even if the physical content of their observables is very different, they are concrete counterexamples to Hilbert Space Fundamentalism (HSF). Taking the observables into account removes the ambiguity of HSF and the clock ambiguity problem attributed to the Page-Wootters formalism, also caused by assuming HSF. These results provide additional motivations to restore the spacetime symmetry in the formulation of Quantum Mechanics and for the Page-Wootters formalism.
Abstract Pauli's theorem asserts that no self-adjoint time operator can exist that is canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with a spectrum bounded from below, preventing time and energy from both being operators in standard quantum mechanics. In this paper, we propose a new reformulation that circumvents this constraint by inverting the roles of time and energy: time becomes a self-adjoint operator, while energy is treated as an external parameter. This dual perspective yields a mathematically equivalent yet physically distinct formulation, where quantum systems evolve according to internal clocks. The model accounts for the measurement problem without invoking collapse, offering an observer-relative interpretation tied to temporal misalignment. The proposed model also suggests a fresh perspective on the relationship between quantum systems and spacetime geometry.
In the framework of any quantum theory in the Schroedinger picture a general operator time concept is given. For this purpose certain systems are emphasized as ideal quantum clocks. Their definition follows heuristically from a common property of ideal clocks and from general postulates of traditional quantum theory. Any such ideal quantum clock allows the definition of a symmetric time operator T. T and the Hamiltonian H necessarily satisfy the time-energy uncertainty relation. The argument of Pauli against the existence of any time operator does not strike, because T is symmetric but not selfadjoint.
The postulates of quantum mechanics associate the time-evolution of a system with its time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We start by examining different solutions to this equation for a particle, represented in terms of a Gaussian wave packet, in different scenarios: free, scattered from a potential energy barrier, or trapped in a potential energy well. In some cases, we encounter stationary solutions, in which the probability density does not change in time (a standing wave). These solutions are identified as eigenfunctions of a system Hamiltonian. The properties of the Hamiltonian as a Hermitian operator are introduced, and particularly, the fact that its proper eigenfunctions can compose an orthonormal set, and that the corresponding eigenvalues are real-valued. Learning that all operators that relate to measurables are Hermitian, and that their eigenvalues relate to the measured values, we conclude that the eigenvalues of the energy operator (Hamiltonian) are the energy levels of the quantum system.