Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Why Bell's Inequalities Are Violated by Quantum Mechanics and Experiments

Gerard van der Ham

Published Oct 1, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Because of wrong interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Bell applied in his theorem P = 1/2 for chances of opposite spincombination results whereas in reality these chances are cosine squared (phi/2). That is when definite spin of entangled electrons is assumed and when projection and perspective are applied correctly. For that reason Bell's inequalities are violated.

Related papers

The Bell Inequalities: Identifying What Is Testable and What Is Not

Louis Sica

The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.

arXiv:1903.02116•Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2020•9 citations

Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their experimental violation

Louis Sica

Derivations of two Bell's inequalities are given in a form appropriate to the interpretation of experimental data for explicit determination of all the correlations. They are arithmetic identities independent of statistical reasoning and thus cannot be violated by data that meets the conditions for their validity. Two experimentally performable procedures are described to meet these conditions. Once such data are acquired, it follows that the measured correlations cannot all equal a negative cosine of angular differences. The relation between this finding and the predictions of quantum mechanics is discussed in a companion paper.

arXiv:quant-ph/0101087•Jan 18, 2001•24 citations

What is Being Measured in Bell-Test Experiments

Gerard van der Ham

In Bell-test experiments the projection of spinvectors of entangled electrons is detected. To get the correct results the perspective of the electrons has to be taken into account. It must also be assumed that electrons of entangled pairs have fixed opposite spin. Based on these assumptions the Quantum Mechanic correlation in Bell-test experiments is perfectly explicable.

•Sep 1, 2020•0 citations

Bell's Theorem and Inequalities, with Experimental Considerations

Niclas Hoglund, Olof H. Jacobson

Bell's theorem is an important milestone in the development of quantum mechanics. It draws a line between concepts such as realism and locality on the one hand and quantum mechanics on the other. Experimentally veried violations of Bell inequalities can yield important information about what assumptions can be made about physical reality. Experiments have been conducted for over 40 years, but have left loopholes open in their executions. It is of great interest to close these loopholes, and in order to do so, further experiments are needed. The objective of this project is to investigate the underlying, previous work in the eld and to formulate a proposal for a new experiment. To do this, the derivations of the original Bell inequality and the CHSH inequality are presented along with previously conducted experiments. Also presented is the EPR paradox from which sprung the original Bell inequality.

•Jan 1, 2013•3 citations

Correlationin Bell-Test Experiments and Perspective

Gerard van der Ham

Applying perspective, projection and assuming fixed opposite spin, Quantum Mechanic correlation is perfectly explicable. Bell's theorem is not applicable to spin detection of entangled electrons because he didn't assume fixed opposite spin of entangled electrons.

•Sep 1, 2020•0 citations

Collapse of Bell’s Theorem

Guangye Chen

Bell’s theorem founded on Bell’s inequalities asserts that no local realistic theories can reproduce all quantum mechanical predictions for spin correlation of particle pairs. It is pointed out that the assumption of setting-independent probability makes Bell’s inequalities not impose constraint on all local realistic models and thus constitutes a theoretical loophole of Bell’s theorem. A counterexample is presented by showing that a local realistic model with appropriate probability density reproduces all quantum mechanical predictions. It becomes clear that experiments violate Bell’s inequalities because the real correlation functions are not constrained by these inequalities. It is also exposed that, rigorous logical reasoning of counter factual deduction does not permit to exclude any premises of Bell’s inequalities by a certain amount of experimental violations of these inequalities.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2019•4 citations
Because of wrong interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Bell applied in his theorem P = 1/2 for chances of opposite spincombination results whereas in reality these chances are cosine squared (phi/2). That is when definite spin of entangled electrons is assumed and when projection and perspective are applied correctly. For that reason Bell's inequalities are violated.
The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.
Derivations of two Bell's inequalities are given in a form appropriate to the interpretation of experimental data for explicit determination of all the correlations. They are arithmetic identities independent of statistical reasoning and thus cannot be violated by data that meets the conditions for their validity. Two experimentally performable procedures are described to meet these conditions. Once such data are acquired, it follows that the measured correlations cannot all equal a negative cosine of angular differences. The relation between this finding and the predictions of quantum mechanics is discussed in a companion paper.
Bell's theorem is an important milestone in the development of quantum mechanics. It draws a line between concepts such as realism and locality on the one hand and quantum mechanics on the other. Experimentally veried violations of Bell inequalities can yield important information about what assumptions can be made about physical reality. Experiments have been conducted for over 40 years, but have left loopholes open in their executions. It is of great interest to close these loopholes, and in order to do so, further experiments are needed. The objective of this project is to investigate the underlying, previous work in the eld and to formulate a proposal for a new experiment. To do this, the derivations of the original Bell inequality and the CHSH inequality are presented along with previously conducted experiments. Also presented is the EPR paradox from which sprung the original Bell inequality.
Bell’s theorem founded on Bell’s inequalities asserts that no local realistic theories can reproduce all quantum mechanical predictions for spin correlation of particle pairs. It is pointed out that the assumption of setting-independent probability makes Bell’s inequalities not impose constraint on all local realistic models and thus constitutes a theoretical loophole of Bell’s theorem. A counterexample is presented by showing that a local realistic model with appropriate probability density reproduces all quantum mechanical predictions. It becomes clear that experiments violate Bell’s inequalities because the real correlation functions are not constrained by these inequalities. It is also exposed that, rigorous logical reasoning of counter factual deduction does not permit to exclude any premises of Bell’s inequalities by a certain amount of experimental violations of these inequalities.