Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Correlationin Bell-Test Experiments and Perspective

Gerard van der Ham

Published Sep 1, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Applying perspective, projection and assuming fixed opposite spin, Quantum Mechanic correlation is perfectly explicable. Bell's theorem is not applicable to spin detection of entangled electrons because he didn't assume fixed opposite spin of entangled electrons.

Related papers

What is Being Measured in Bell-Test Experiments

Gerard van der Ham

In Bell-test experiments the projection of spinvectors of entangled electrons is detected. To get the correct results the perspective of the electrons has to be taken into account. It must also be assumed that electrons of entangled pairs have fixed opposite spin. Based on these assumptions the Quantum Mechanic correlation in Bell-test experiments is perfectly explicable.

•Sep 1, 2020•0 citations

Perspective in Bell-test Experiments

Gerard van der Ham

Perspective is essential in the account for Quantum Mechanic correlation in Bell-test experiments.

•Sep 1, 2020•0 citations

Why Bell's Inequalities Are Violated by Quantum Mechanics and Experiments

Gerard van der Ham

Because of wrong interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Bell applied in his theorem P = 1/2 for chances of opposite spincombination results whereas in reality these chances are cosine squared (phi/2). That is when definite spin of entangled electrons is assumed and when projection and perspective are applied correctly. For that reason Bell's inequalities are violated.

•Oct 1, 2020•0 citations

Model and Method to Explain Correlation in Bell-Test Experiments

Gerard van der Ham

The correlation in Bell-test experiments in relation to elektronspin can be explained according to local-realism. A simple model shows that the position of the detectors respective of the direction of movement of the elektrons define vektorspaces in which the opposit spinvektors of entangled pairs of elektrons are, which give equal spin result. With this model the identification of those vektorspaces and the measuring and counting of the spinvektors can be described. In this way correlation, as it is calculated in quantum theory and found in experiments, is explained.

•Jul 1, 2019•0 citations

On Bell's Theorem and Quantum-Mechanically Predicted Perfect Correlation

Guang-Liang Li

The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.

•Aug 28, 2026•0 citations

On Bell's Theorem and Quantum-Mechanically Predicted Perfect Correlation

Guang-Liang Li

The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.

•Sep 14, 2026•0 citations
The correlation in Bell-test experiments in relation to elektronspin can be explained according to local-realism. A simple model shows that the position of the detectors respective of the direction of movement of the elektrons define vektorspaces in which the opposit spinvektors of entangled pairs of elektrons are, which give equal spin result. With this model the identification of those vektorspaces and the measuring and counting of the spinvektors can be described. In this way correlation, as it is calculated in quantum theory and found in experiments, is explained.
The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.
The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.