Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Loss of classicality in alternating Spin Chain, in the presence of next-neighbor couplings and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions

Abhiroop Lahiri, Swapan Kumar Pati

Published Oct 13, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We have considered and alternating Heisenberg spin chain with nearest-neighbor ($J_1$), next-nearest neighbor ($J_2$) antiferromagnetic couplings along with z-component of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya(DM) ($D_z$) interactions. The Hamiltonian has been studied using (a) Linear Spin-Wave Theory(LSWT) and (b) Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG). The system had been reported earlier as a classical ferrimagnet only when nearest neighbor exchange interactions are present. Both the antiferromagnetic next-nearest neighbor interactions and DM interactions introduce strong quantum fluctuations and due to which all the signatures of ferrimagnetism vanishes. We find that the nonzero $J_2$ introduces strong quantum fluctuations in each of the spin sites due to which the z-components of both spin-1 and spin-1/2 sites average out to be zero. The ground state becomes a singlet. The presence of $J_1$ along with $D_z$ introduces a short range order but develops long range order along the XY plane. $J_1$ along with $J_2$ induces competing phases with structure factor showing sharp and wide peaks, at two different angles reflecting the spin spiral structure locally as well as in the underlying lattice. Interestingly, we find that the $D_z$ term removes the local spin spiral structure in z-direction, while developing a spiral order in the XY plane.

Related papers

Loss of classicality in alternating spin-$\frac{1}{2}$/spin-$1$ chain, in the presence of next-neighbor couplings and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions

Abhiroop Lahiri, Swapan Kumar Pati

We have considered and alternating Heisenberg spin chain with nearest-neighbor ($J_1$), next-nearest neighbor ($J_2$) antiferromagnetic couplings along with z-component of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya(DM) ($D_z$) interactions. The Hamiltonian has been studied using (a) Linear Spin-Wave Theory(LSWT) and (b) Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG). The system had been reported earlier as a classical ferrimagnet only when nearest neighbor exchange interactions are present. Both the antiferromagnetic next-nearest neighbor interactions and DM interactions introduce strong quantum fluctuations and due to which all the signatures of ferrimagnetism vanishes. We find that the nonzero $J_2$ introduces strong quantum fluctuations in each of the spin sites due to which the z-components of both spin-1 and spin-1/2 sites average out to be zero. The ground state becomes a singlet. The presence of $J_1$ along with $D_z$ introduces a short range order but develops long range order along the XY plane. $J_1$ along with $J_2$ induces competing phases with structure factor showing sharp and wide peaks, at two different angles reflecting the spin spiral structure locally as well as in the underlying lattice. Interestingly, we find that the $D_z$ term removes the local spin spiral structure in z-direction, while developing a spiral order in the XY plane.

arXiv:2010.06258•Oct 13, 2020•0 citations

Loss of classicality in alternating spin- 1 2 /spin-1 chain, in the presence of next-neighbor couplings and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions

Abhiroop Lahiri, Swapan K Pati

Abstract We have considered and alternating spin- 1 2 /spin-1 chain with nearest-neighbor (NN) (J 1), next-nearest neighbor (NNN) (J 2) antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg interactions along with z-component of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) (Dz ) interaction. The Hamiltonian has been studied using (a) linear spin-wave theory and (b) density matrix renormalization group. The system had been reported earlier as a classical ferrimagnet only when NN exchange interactions are present. Both the AFM NNN interactions and DM interactions introduce strong quantum fluctuations and due to which all the signatures of ferrimagnetism vanishes. We find that the nonzero J 2 introduces strong quantum fluctuations in each of the spin sites due to which the z-components of both spin-1 and spin-1/2 sites average out to be zero. The ground state becomes a singlet. The presence of J 1 along with Dz introduces a short range order but develops long range order along the XY plane. J 1 along with J 2 induces competing phases with structure factor showing sharp and wide peaks, at two different angles reflecting the spin spiral structure locally as well as in the underlying lattice. Interestingly, we find that the D z term removes the local spin spiral structure in z-direction, while developing a spiral order in the XY plane.

Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Jan 12, 2022•1 citation

Frustrated quantum Heisenberg ferrimagnetic chains

Nedko B. Ivanov, Johannes Richter, Ulrich Schollwöck

We study the ground-state properties of weakly frustrated Heisenberg ferrimagnetic chains with nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange interactions and two types of alternating sublattice spins ${S}_{1}>{S}_{2},$ using $1/S$ spin-wave expansions, density-matrix renormalization group, and exact diagonalization techniques. It is argued that the zero-point spin fluctuations completely destroy the classical commensurate-incommensurate continuous transition. Instead, the long-range ferrimagnetic state disappears through a discontinuous transition to a singlet state at a larger value of the frustration parameter. In the ferrimagnetic phase we find a disorder point marking the onset of incommensurate real-space short-range spin-spin correlations.

arXiv:cond-mat/9803150•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Dec 1, 1998•30 citations

A dimerized and frustrated spin model with alternating ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic exchanges: investigating quantum phases of Heisenberg spin chains with s = 1/2 and 1

Shaon Sahoo, V. M. L. Durga Prasad Goli, Diptiman Sen +1 more

We study Heisenberg spin-1/2 and spin-1 chains with alternating ferromagnetic ($J_1^F$) and antiferromagnetic ($J_1^A$) nearest-neighbor interactions and ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction ($J_2^F$). In this model frustration is induced by the non-zero $J_2^F$ and the effect of dimerization is realized by changing the strength of $J_1^A$ for a fixed value of $J_1^F$. The model with site spin $s$ behaves like a Haldane spin chain with site spin 2$s$ in the limit of vanishing $J_2^F$ and large $J_1^F/J_1^A$. We show that the exact ground state of the model can be found along a line in the parameter space. The phase diagram in the space of $J_1^A-J_2^F$ is determined using numerical techniques complemented by some analytical calculations. A number of quantities, including the ground state spin, energy gap, structure factor, entanglement entropy, and zero temperature magnetization, are studied to understand the complete phase diagram. An interesting and application-wise important feature of this model is that it exhibits a macroscopic magnetization jump in the presence of a magnetic field; we study this using an effective Hamiltonian.

•May 29, 2013•0 citations

Vector chiral and multipolar orders in the spin- 1 2 frustrated ferromagnetic chain in magnetic field

Toshiya Hikihara, Lars Kecke, Tsutomu Momoi +1 more

We study the one-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with competing ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor ${J}_{1}$ and antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor ${J}_{2}$ exchange couplings in the presence of magnetic field. We use both numerical approaches (the density-matrix renormalization-group method and exact diagonalization) and effective-field-theory approach and obtain the ground-state phase diagram for wide parameter range of the coupling ratio ${J}_{1}/{J}_{2}$. The phase diagram is rich and has a variety of phases, including the vector chiral phase, the nematic phase, and other multipolar phases. In the vector chiral phase, which appears in relatively weak magnetic field, the ground state exhibits long-range order (LRO) of vector chirality which spontaneously breaks a parity symmetry. The nematic phase shows a quasi-LRO of antiferronematic spin correlation and arises as a result of formation of two-magnon bound states in high magnetic fields. Similarly, the higher multipolar phases, such as triatic $(p=3)$ and quartic $(p=4)$ phases, are formed through binding of $p$ magnons near the saturation fields, showing quasi-LRO of antiferromultipolar spin correlations. The multipolar phases cross over to spin-density-wave phases as the magnetic field is decreased before encountering a phase transition to the vector chiral phase at a lower field. The implications of our results to quasi-one-dimensional frustrated magnets (e.g., ${\text{LiCuVO}}_{4}$) are discussed.

arXiv:0807.0858•Physical Review B•Oct 6, 2008•306 citations

Ground-state phases of the frustrated spin- 12 J1 – J2 – J3 Heisenberg ferromagnet ( J1<0 ) on the honeycomb lattice with J3=J2>0

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL +2 more

We study the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$--${J}_{2}$--${J}_{3}$ Heisenberg model on the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor (${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (${J}_{2}>0$) and next-next-nearest-neighbor (${J}_{3}>0$) exchanges, for the case ${J}_{3}={J}_{2}$. We use the coupled-cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, complemented by the Lanczos exact diagonalization of a large finite lattice with 32 sites, in order to calculate the GS energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. In one scenario we find a quantum phase transition point between regions characterized by ferromagnetic order and a form of antiferromagnetic (``striped'') collinear order at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.1095\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0005$, which is below the corresponding hypothetical transition point at ${J}_{2}^{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{1}{7}$ ($\ensuremath{\approx}0.143$) for the classical version of the model, in which we momentarily ignore the intervening noncollinear spiral phase in the region $\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}$. Hence we see that quantum fluctuations appear to stabilize somewhat the collinear antiferromagnetic order in preference to the ferromagnetic order in this model. We compare results for the present ferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) to previous results for the corresponding antiferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=+1$). The magnetic order parameter is found to behave similarly for the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic models for large values of the frustration parameter ${J}_{2}$. However, there are considerable differences in the behavior of the order parameters for the two models for ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the antiferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=+1$) breaks down at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, whereas the ``equivalent'' point for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) occurs at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.11$. Unlike in the antiferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=+1$), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases (with N\'eel and striped order) for ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}<{J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}$, with ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, we find no clear indications at all in the ferromagnetic model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the corresponding phases exhibiting ferromagnetic and striped order. Instead the evidence for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) points to one of two scenarios: either there is a direct first-order transition between the two magnetically ordered phases, as mentioned above; or there exists an intervening phase between them in the very narrow range $0.10\ensuremath{\lesssim}{J}_{2}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.12$, which is probably a remnant of the spiral phase that exists in the classical counterpart of the model over the larger range $\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}$.

arXiv:1109.6229•Physical Review B•Feb 21, 2012•31 citations
We have considered and alternating Heisenberg spin chain with nearest-neighbor (J1J_1J1​), next-nearest neighbor (J2J_2J2​) antiferromagnetic couplings along with z-component of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya(DM) (DzD_zDz​) interactions. The Hamiltonian has been studied using (a) Linear Spin-Wave Theory(LSWT) and (b) Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG). The system had been reported earlier as a classical ferrimagnet only when nearest neighbor exchange interactions are present. Both the antiferromagnetic next-nearest neighbor interactions and DM interactions introduce strong quantum fluctuations and due to which all the signatures of ferrimagnetism vanishes. We find that the nonzero J2J_2J2​ introduces strong quantum fluctuations in each of the spin sites due to which the z-components of both spin-1 and spin-1/2 sites average out to be zero. The ground state becomes a singlet. The presence of J1J_1J1​ along with DzD_zDz​ introduces a short range order but develops long range order along the XY plane. J1J_1J1​ along with J2J_2J2​ induces competing phases with structure factor showing sharp and wide peaks, at two different angles reflecting the spin spiral structure locally as well as in the underlying lattice. Interestingly, we find that the DzD_zDz​ term removes the local spin spiral structure in z-direction, while developing a spiral order in the XY plane.
Loss of classicality in alternating spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​/spin-111 chain, in the presence of next-neighbor couplings and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions
We have considered and alternating Heisenberg spin chain with nearest-neighbor (J1J_1J1​), next-nearest neighbor (J2J_2J2​) antiferromagnetic couplings along with z-component of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya(DM) (DzD_zDz​) interactions. The Hamiltonian has been studied using (a) Linear Spin-Wave Theory(LSWT) and (b) Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG). The system had been reported earlier as a classical ferrimagnet only when nearest neighbor exchange interactions are present. Both the antiferromagnetic next-nearest neighbor interactions and DM interactions introduce strong quantum fluctuations and due to which all the signatures of ferrimagnetism vanishes. We find that the nonzero J2J_2J2​ introduces strong quantum fluctuations in each of the spin sites due to which the z-components of both spin-1 and spin-1/2 sites average out to be zero. The ground state becomes a singlet. The presence of J1J_1J1​ along with DzD_zDz​ introduces a short range order but develops long range order along the XY plane. J1J_1J1​ along with J2J_2J2​ induces competing phases with structure factor showing sharp and wide peaks, at two different angles reflecting the spin spiral structure locally as well as in the underlying lattice. Interestingly, we find that the DzD_zDz​ term removes the local spin spiral structure in z-direction, while developing a spiral order in the XY plane.
Abstract We have considered and alternating spin- 1 2 /spin-1 chain with nearest-neighbor (NN) (J 1), next-nearest neighbor (NNN) (J 2) antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg interactions along with z-component of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) (Dz ) interaction. The Hamiltonian has been studied using (a) linear spin-wave theory and (b) density matrix renormalization group. The system had been reported earlier as a classical ferrimagnet only when NN exchange interactions are present. Both the AFM NNN interactions and DM interactions introduce strong quantum fluctuations and due to which all the signatures of ferrimagnetism vanishes. We find that the nonzero J 2 introduces strong quantum fluctuations in each of the spin sites due to which the z-components of both spin-1 and spin-1/2 sites average out to be zero. The ground state becomes a singlet. The presence of J 1 along with Dz introduces a short range order but develops long range order along the XY plane. J 1 along with J 2 induces competing phases with structure factor showing sharp and wide peaks, at two different angles reflecting the spin spiral structure locally as well as in the underlying lattice. Interestingly, we find that the D z term removes the local spin spiral structure in z-direction, while developing a spiral order in the XY plane.
We study the ground-state properties of weakly frustrated Heisenberg ferrimagnetic chains with nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange interactions and two types of alternating sublattice spins S1>S2,{S}_{1}>{S}_{2},S1​>S2​, using 1/S1/S1/S spin-wave expansions, density-matrix renormalization group, and exact diagonalization techniques. It is argued that the zero-point spin fluctuations completely destroy the classical commensurate-incommensurate continuous transition. Instead, the long-range ferrimagnetic state disappears through a discontinuous transition to a singlet state at a larger value of the frustration parameter. In the ferrimagnetic phase we find a disorder point marking the onset of incommensurate real-space short-range spin-spin correlations.
We study Heisenberg spin-1/2 and spin-1 chains with alternating ferromagnetic (J1FJ_1^FJ1F​) and antiferromagnetic (J1AJ_1^AJ1A​) nearest-neighbor interactions and ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction (J2FJ_2^FJ2F​). In this model frustration is induced by the non-zero J2FJ_2^FJ2F​ and the effect of dimerization is realized by changing the strength of J1AJ_1^AJ1A​ for a fixed value of J1FJ_1^FJ1F​. The model with site spin sss behaves like a Haldane spin chain with site spin 2sss in the limit of vanishing J2FJ_2^FJ2F​ and large J1F/J1AJ_1^F/J_1^AJ1F​/J1A​. We show that the exact ground state of the model can be found along a line in the parameter space. The phase diagram in the space of J1A−J2FJ_1^A-J_2^FJ1A​−J2F​ is determined using numerical techniques complemented by some analytical calculations. A number of quantities, including the ground state spin, energy gap, structure factor, entanglement entropy, and zero temperature magnetization, are studied to understand the complete phase diagram. An interesting and application-wise important feature of this model is that it exhibits a macroscopic magnetization jump in the presence of a magnetic field; we study this using an effective Hamiltonian.
We study the one-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with competing ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor J1{J}_{1}J1​ and antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor J2{J}_{2}J2​ exchange couplings in the presence of magnetic field. We use both numerical approaches (the density-matrix renormalization-group method and exact diagonalization) and effective-field-theory approach and obtain the ground-state phase diagram for wide parameter range of the coupling ratio J1/J2{J}_{1}/{J}_{2}J1​/J2​. The phase diagram is rich and has a variety of phases, including the vector chiral phase, the nematic phase, and other multipolar phases. In the vector chiral phase, which appears in relatively weak magnetic field, the ground state exhibits long-range order (LRO) of vector chirality which spontaneously breaks a parity symmetry. The nematic phase shows a quasi-LRO of antiferronematic spin correlation and arises as a result of formation of two-magnon bound states in high magnetic fields. Similarly, the higher multipolar phases, such as triatic (p=3)(p=3)(p=3) and quartic (p=4)(p=4)(p=4) phases, are formed through binding of ppp magnons near the saturation fields, showing quasi-LRO of antiferromultipolar spin correlations. The multipolar phases cross over to spin-density-wave phases as the magnetic field is decreased before encountering a phase transition to the vector chiral phase at a lower field. The implications of our results to quasi-one-dimensional frustrated magnets (e.g., LiCuVO4{\text{LiCuVO}}_{4}LiCuVO4​) are discussed.
We study the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​--J2{J}_{2}J2​--J3{J}_{3}J3​ Heisenberg model on the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor (${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (J2>0{J}_{2}>0J2​>0) and next-next-nearest-neighbor (J3>0{J}_{3}>0J3​>0) exchanges, for the case J3=J2{J}_{3}={J}_{2}J3​=J2​. We use the coupled-cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, complemented by the Lanczos exact diagonalization of a large finite lattice with 32 sites, in order to calculate the GS energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. In one scenario we find a quantum phase transition point between regions characterized by ferromagnetic order and a form of antiferromagnetic (``striped'') collinear order at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.1095\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0005$, which is below the corresponding hypothetical transition point at J2cl=17{J}_{2}^{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{1}{7}J2cl​=71​ ($\ensuremath{\approx}0.143$) for the classical version of the model, in which we momentarily ignore the intervening noncollinear spiral phase in the region 110<J2<15\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}101​<J2​<51​. Hence we see that quantum fluctuations appear to stabilize somewhat the collinear antiferromagnetic order in preference to the ferromagnetic order in this model. We compare results for the present ferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) to previous results for the corresponding antiferromagnetic case (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1). The magnetic order parameter is found to behave similarly for the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic models for large values of the frustration parameter J2{J}_{2}J2​. However, there are considerable differences in the behavior of the order parameters for the two models for ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the antiferromagnetic model (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1) breaks down at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, whereas the ``equivalent'' point for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) occurs at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.11$. Unlike in the antiferromagnetic model (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases (with N\'eel and striped order) for J2c1<J2<J2c2{J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}<{J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}J2c1​​<J2​<J2c2​​, with ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, we find no clear indications at all in the ferromagnetic model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the corresponding phases exhibiting ferromagnetic and striped order. Instead the evidence for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) points to one of two scenarios: either there is a direct first-order transition between the two magnetically ordered phases, as mentioned above; or there exists an intervening phase between them in the very narrow range $0.10\ensuremath{\lesssim}{J}_{2}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.12$, which is probably a remnant of the spiral phase that exists in the classical counterpart of the model over the larger range 110<J2<15\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}101​<J2​<51​.