Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

An Arbitrarily Concealing and Practically Binding Quantum Bit Commitment Protocol

Xin Sun, Quanlong Wang, Feifei He

Published Oct 6, 2020• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-020-04604-z

Related papers

Practical quantum bit commitment protocol

Ariel Danan, Lev Vaidman A

arXiv:1202.3331•Quantum Information Processing•Aug 31, 2011•24 citations

Perfectly Concealing Quantum Bit Commitment from any Quantum One-Way Permutation

Paul Dumais, Dominic Mayers, Louis Salvail

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2000•92 citations

Unconditionally Secure Quantum Bit Commitment Protocol

최정운

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Degrees of concealment and bindingness in quantum bit commitment protocols

Robert W. Spekkens, Terry Rudolph

Although it is impossible for a bit commitment protocol to be both arbitrarily concealing and arbitrarily binding, it is possible for it to be both partiallyconcealing and partiallybinding. This means that Bob cannot, prior to the beginning of the unveiling phase, find out everything about the bit committed, and Alice cannot, through actions taken after the end of the commitment phase, unveil whatever bit she desires. We determine upper bounds on the degrees of concealment and bindingness that can be achieved simultaneously in anybit commitment protocol, although it is unknown whether these can be saturated. We do, however, determine the maxima of these quantities in a restricted class of bit commitment protocols, namely, those wherein all the systems that play a role in the commitment phase are supplied by Alice. We show that these maxima can be achieved using a protocol that requires Alice to prepare a pair of systems in an entangled state, submit one of the pair to Bob at the commitment phase, and the other at the unveiling phase. Finally, we determine the form of the trade off that exists between the degree of concealment and the degree of bindingness given various assumptions about the purity and dimensionality of the states used in the protocol.

arXiv:quant-ph/0106019•Physical Review A•Dec 11, 2001•194 citations

Unconditionally Secure Quantum Bit Commitment Protocol Based on Incomplete Information

Naya Nagy, Marius Nagy

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•3 citations

A simple practical quantum bit commitment protocol

muqian wen

This paper devises a simple quantum bit commitment protocol that is just as easy to implement as any existing practical quantum bit commitment protocols but will be more secure. It will be infinitely close to being unconditionally fully secure although neither perfectly binding nor perfectly concealing.

arXiv:2009.13263•Sep 25, 2020•0 citations
Although it is impossible for a bit commitment protocol to be both arbitrarily concealing and arbitrarily binding, it is possible for it to be both partiallyconcealing and partiallybinding. This means that Bob cannot, prior to the beginning of the unveiling phase, find out everything about the bit committed, and Alice cannot, through actions taken after the end of the commitment phase, unveil whatever bit she desires. We determine upper bounds on the degrees of concealment and bindingness that can be achieved simultaneously in anybit commitment protocol, although it is unknown whether these can be saturated. We do, however, determine the maxima of these quantities in a restricted class of bit commitment protocols, namely, those wherein all the systems that play a role in the commitment phase are supplied by Alice. We show that these maxima can be achieved using a protocol that requires Alice to prepare a pair of systems in an entangled state, submit one of the pair to Bob at the commitment phase, and the other at the unveiling phase. Finally, we determine the form of the trade off that exists between the degree of concealment and the degree of bindingness given various assumptions about the purity and dimensionality of the states used in the protocol.