Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fundamental theories of physics

Energy-Lifetime Relations

Robert Grummt, Nicola Vona

Published Oct 2, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-46777-7_12

Related papers

On the lifetime-width relation for a decaying state and the uncertainty principle

M. Bauer, Pier A. Mello

A new formulation of the uncertainty relation of position and momentum, and of energy and time, is presented. The connection between the lifetime of excited states and the energy width of these states, which does not follow from the usual uncertainty relation, is shown to be a consequence of the expression here derived.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Feb 1, 1976•15 citations

Crossing of energy levels

W.J. Caspers

Physica•Oct 1, 1968•14 citations

On the lifetime-width relation for a decaying state and the uncertainty principle (decay law/line shape/characteristic time/equivalent width/time coherence)

M. Bauer, Pier A. Mello

A new formulation of the uncertainty rela- tion of position and momentum, and of energy and time, is presented. The connection between the lifetime of excited states and the energy width of these states, which does not follow from the usual uncertainty relation, is shown to be a consequence of the expression here derived.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Energy level transitions

Dale M. Grimes

Proceedings of the IEEE•Jan 1, 1965•2 citations

Diffraction in time and the time–energy uncertainty relation

M. Moshińsky

The purpose of this paper is to discuss two forms in which the time–energy uncertainty relation can appear. One of them concerns the time of preparation of a given state and the other the lifetime of compound systems. Both will be illustrated here through exactly solvable examples. The first one will be the opening and subsequent closing of a shutter on which we have an incident beam of particles. This problem shows a diffraction-in-time effect closely connected with the first type of time–energy uncertainty relation. The second will be the decay of a compound state described through a schematic R matrix formalism. There one can clearly see the transition between the time–energy uncertainty relation as associated with the interval in which the decay process has been in operation, and as associated with the lifetime of the compound state.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 1976•61 citations

Atoms and Energy

Pieter Kok

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations
The purpose of this paper is to discuss two forms in which the time–energy uncertainty relation can appear. One of them concerns the time of preparation of a given state and the other the lifetime of compound systems. Both will be illustrated here through exactly solvable examples. The first one will be the opening and subsequent closing of a shutter on which we have an incident beam of particles. This problem shows a diffraction-in-time effect closely connected with the first type of time–energy uncertainty relation. The second will be the decay of a compound state described through a schematic R matrix formalism. There one can clearly see the transition between the time–energy uncertainty relation as associated with the interval in which the decay process has been in operation, and as associated with the lifetime of the compound state.