We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of given order t≥1 sum to at most (cd/t)t/2(1+logn)(t−1)/2, where n is the number of variables, d is the tree depth, and c>0 is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal (arxiv 2019; FOCS 2020). The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with t, becoming trivial already at t=√d.
We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of given order t≥1 sum to at most (cd/t)t/2(1+logn)(t−1)/2, where n is the number of variables, d is the tree depth, and c>0 is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal (arxiv 2019; FOCS 2020). The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with t, becoming trivial already at t=√d.
We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order ℓ≥1 sum to at most cℓ(ℓd)(1+logn)ℓ−1, where n is the number of variables, d is the tree depth, and c>0 is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal (arxiv 2019; FOCS 2020). The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with ℓ, becoming trivial already at ℓ=d. As an application, we obtain, for every integer k≥1, a partial Boolean function on n bits that has bounded-error quantum query complexity at most k and randomized query complexity Ω~(n1−2k1). This separation of bounded-error quantum versus randomized query complexity is best possible, by the results of Aaronson and Ambainis (STOC 2015) and Bravyi, Gosset, Grier, and Schaeffer (2021). Prior to our work, the best known separation was polynomially weaker: O(1) versus Ω(n2/3−ε) for any ε>0 (Tal, FOCS 2020). As another application, we obtain an essentially optimal separation of O(logn) versus Ω(n1−ε) for bounded-error quantum versus randomized communication complexity, for any ε>0. The best previous separation was polynomially weaker: O(logn) versus Ω(n2/3−ε) (implicit in Tal, FOCS 2020).
Abstract. We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order [Formula: see text] sum to at most [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of variables, [Formula: see text] is the tree depth, and [Formula: see text] is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal [ Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]. The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with [Formula: see text], becoming trivial already at [Formula: see text]. As an application, we obtain, for every integer [Formula: see text], a partial Boolean function on [Formula: see text] bits that has bounded-error quantum query complexity at most [Formula: see text] and randomized query complexity [Formula: see text]. This separation of bounded-error quantum versus randomized query complexity is best possible, by the results of Aaronson and Ambainis [ SIAM J. Comput., 47 (2018), pp. 982–1038] and Bravyi et al. [ Classical Algorithms for Forrelation, arXiv preprint, 2021]. Prior to our work, the best known separation was polynomially weaker: [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text] [A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]. As another application, we obtain an essentially optimal separation of [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] for bounded-error quantum versus randomized communication complexity for any [Formula: see text]. The best previous separation was polynomially weaker: [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] (this is implicit in [A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]).
We prove that for every parity decision tree of depth d on n variables, the sum of absolute values of Fourier coefficients at level ℓ is at most dℓ/2⋅O(ℓ⋅log(n))ℓ. Our result is nearly tight for small values of ℓ and extends a previous Fourier bound for standard decision trees by Sherstov, Storozhenko, and Wu (STOC, 2021).
As an application of our Fourier bounds, using the results of Bansal and Sinha (STOC, 2021), we show that the k-fold Forrelation problem has (randomized) parity decision tree complexity Ω~(n1−1/k), while having quantum query complexity ⌈k/2⌉.
Our proof follows a random-walk approach, analyzing the contribution of a random path in the decision tree to the level-ℓ Fourier expression. To carry the argument, we apply a careful cleanup procedure to the parity decision tree, ensuring that the value of the random walk is bounded with high probability. We observe that step sizes for the level-ℓ walks can be computed by the intermediate values of level ≤ℓ−1 walks, which calls for an inductive argument. Our approach differs from previous proofs of Tal (FOCS, 2020) and Sherstov, Storozhenko, and Wu (STOC, 2021) that relied on decompositions of the tree. In particular, for the special case of standard decision trees we view our proof as slightly simpler and more intuitive.
In addition, we prove a similar bound for noisy decision trees of cost at most d -- a model that was recently introduced by Ben-David and Blais (FOCS, 2020).
We prove that for every parity decision tree of depth d on n variables, the sum of absolute values of Fourier coefficients at level 𝓁 is at most d^{𝓁/2} ⋅ O(𝓁 ⋅ log(n))^𝓁. Our result is nearly tight for small values of 𝓁 and extends a previous Fourier bound for standard decision trees by Sherstov, Storozhenko, and Wu (STOC, 2021). As an application of our Fourier bounds, using the results of Bansal and Sinha (STOC, 2021), we show that the k-fold Forrelation problem has (randomized) parity decision tree complexity Ω̃(n^{1-1/k}), while having quantum query complexity ⌈ k/2⌉. Our proof follows a random-walk approach, analyzing the contribution of a random path in the decision tree to the level-𝓁 Fourier expression. To carry the argument, we apply a careful cleanup procedure to the parity decision tree, ensuring that the value of the random walk is bounded with high probability. We observe that step sizes for the level-𝓁 walks can be computed by the intermediate values of level ≤ 𝓁-1 walks, which calls for an inductive argument. Our approach differs from previous proofs of Tal (FOCS, 2020) and Sherstov, Storozhenko, and Wu (STOC, 2021) that relied on decompositions of the tree. In particular, for the special case of standard decision trees we view our proof as slightly simpler and more intuitive. In addition, we prove a similar bound for noisy decision trees of cost at most d - a model that was recently introduced by Ben-David and Blais (FOCS, 2020).
The query model offers a concrete setting where quantum algorithms are provably superior to randomized algorithms. Beautiful results by Bernstein-Vazirani, Simon, Aaronson, and others presented partial Boolean functions that can be computed by quantum algorithms making much fewer queries compared to their randomized analogs. To date, separations of O(1) vs. √N between quantum and randomized query complexities remain the state-of-the-art (where N is the input length), leaving open the question of whether O(1) vs. N1/2+Ω(1)separations are possible? We answer this question in the affirmative. Our separating problem is a variant of the Aaronson-Ambainis k-fold Forrelation problem. We show that our variant: 1)Can be solved by a quantum algorithm making 2O(k)queries to the inputs. 2)Requires at least ~Ω(N2(k-1)/(3k-1)) queries for any randomized algorithm. For any constant , this gives a O(1) vs. N1/2-εseparation between the quantum and randomized query complexities of partial Boolean functions. Our proof is Fourier analytical and uses new bounds on the Fourier spectrum of classical decision trees, which could be of independent interest. Looking forward, we conjecture that the Fourier bounds could be further improved in a precise manner, and show that such conjectured bounds imply optimal O(1) vs. N1-εseparations between the quantum and randomized query complexities of partial Boolean functions.
We give improved separations for the query complexity analogue of the log-approximate-rank conjecture i.e. we show that there are a plethora of total Boolean functions on n input bits, each of which has approximate Fourier sparsity at most O(n3) and randomized parity decision tree complexity Θ(n). This improves upon the recent work of Chattopadhyay, Mande and Sherif (JACM '20) both qualitatively (in terms of designing a large number of examples) and quantitatively (improving the gap from quartic to cubic). We leave open the problem of proving a randomized communication complexity lower bound for XOR compositions of our examples. A linear lower bound would lead to new and improved refutations of the log-approximate-rank conjecture. Moreover, if any of these compositions had even a sub-linear cost randomized communication protocol, it would demonstrate that randomized parity decision tree complexity does not lift to randomized communication complexity in general (with the XOR gadget).