The query model offers a concrete setting where quantum algorithms are provably superior to randomized algorithms. Beautiful results by Bernstein-Vazirani, Simon, Aaronson, and others presented partial Boolean functions that can be computed by quantum algorithms making much fewer queries compared to their randomized analogs. To date, separations of O(1) vs. √N between quantum and randomized query complexities remain the state-of-the-art (where N is the input length), leaving open the question of whether O(1) vs. N1/2+Ω(1)separations are possible? We answer this question in the affirmative. Our separating problem is a variant of the Aaronson-Ambainis k-fold Forrelation problem. We show that our variant: 1)Can be solved by a quantum algorithm making 2O(k)queries to the inputs. 2)Requires at least ~Ω(N2(k-1)/(3k-1)) queries for any randomized algorithm. For any constant , this gives a O(1) vs. N1/2-εseparation between the quantum and randomized query complexities of partial Boolean functions. Our proof is Fourier analytical and uses new bounds on the Fourier spectrum of classical decision trees, which could be of independent interest. Looking forward, we conjecture that the Fourier bounds could be further improved in a precise manner, and show that such conjectured bounds imply optimal O(1) vs. N1-εseparations between the quantum and randomized query complexities of partial Boolean functions.
The query model offers a concrete setting where quantum algorithms are provably superior to randomized algorithms. Beautiful results by Bernstein-Vazirani, Simon, Aaronson, and others presented partial Boolean functions that can be computed by quantum algorithms making much fewer queries compared to their randomized analogs. To date, separations of O(1) vs. √N between quantum and randomized query complexities remain the state-of-the-art (where N is the input length), leaving open the question of whether O(1) vs. N1/2+Ω(1)separations are possible? We answer this question in the affirmative. Our separating problem is a variant of the Aaronson-Ambainis k-fold Forrelation problem. We show that our variant: 1)Can be solved by a quantum algorithm making 2O(k)queries to the inputs. 2)Requires at least ~Ω(N2(k-1)/(3k-1)) queries for any randomized algorithm. For any constant , this gives a O(1) vs. N1/2-εseparation between the quantum and randomized query complexities of partial Boolean functions. Our proof is Fourier analytical and uses new bounds on the Fourier spectrum of classical decision trees, which could be of independent interest. Looking forward, we conjecture that the Fourier bounds could be further improved in a precise manner, and show that such conjectured bounds imply optimal O(1) vs. N1-εseparations between the quantum and randomized query complexities of partial Boolean functions.
Aaronson and Ambainis (SICOMP ‘18) showed that any partial function on N bits that can be computed with an advantage δ over a random guess by making q quantum queries, can also be computed classically with an advantage δ/2 by a randomized decision tree making Oq(N1−1/2qδ−2) queries. Moreover, they conjectured the k-Forrelation problem — a partial function that can be computed with q = ⌈ k/2 ⌉ quantum queries — to be a suitable candidate for exhibiting such an extremal separation.
We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order ℓ≥1 sum to at most cℓ(ℓd)(1+logn)ℓ−1, where n is the number of variables, d is the tree depth, and c>0 is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal (arxiv 2019; FOCS 2020). The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with ℓ, becoming trivial already at ℓ=d. As an application, we obtain, for every integer k≥1, a partial Boolean function on n bits that has bounded-error quantum query complexity at most k and randomized query complexity Ω~(n1−2k1). This separation of bounded-error quantum versus randomized query complexity is best possible, by the results of Aaronson and Ambainis (STOC 2015) and Bravyi, Gosset, Grier, and Schaeffer (2021). Prior to our work, the best known separation was polynomially weaker: O(1) versus Ω(n2/3−ε) for any ε>0 (Tal, FOCS 2020). As another application, we obtain an essentially optimal separation of O(logn) versus Ω(n1−ε) for bounded-error quantum versus randomized communication complexity, for any ε>0. The best previous separation was polynomially weaker: O(logn) versus Ω(n2/3−ε) (implicit in Tal, FOCS 2020).
Abstract. We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order [Formula: see text] sum to at most [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of variables, [Formula: see text] is the tree depth, and [Formula: see text] is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal [ Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]. The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with [Formula: see text], becoming trivial already at [Formula: see text]. As an application, we obtain, for every integer [Formula: see text], a partial Boolean function on [Formula: see text] bits that has bounded-error quantum query complexity at most [Formula: see text] and randomized query complexity [Formula: see text]. This separation of bounded-error quantum versus randomized query complexity is best possible, by the results of Aaronson and Ambainis [ SIAM J. Comput., 47 (2018), pp. 982–1038] and Bravyi et al. [ Classical Algorithms for Forrelation, arXiv preprint, 2021]. Prior to our work, the best known separation was polynomially weaker: [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text] [A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]. As another application, we obtain an essentially optimal separation of [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] for bounded-error quantum versus randomized communication complexity for any [Formula: see text]. The best previous separation was polynomially weaker: [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text] (this is implicit in [A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]).
Watrous conjectured that the randomized and quantum query complexities of symmetric functions are polynomially equivalent, which was resolved by Aaronson & Ambainis (2014) and was later improved by Chailloux (2019) and Ben-David et al. (2020). This paper explores a fine-grained version of the Watrous conjecture, including the randomized and quantum algorithms with success probabilities arbitrarily close to 1/2 1 / 2 . Our contributions include the following: 1. We analyze the optimal success probabilities of quantum and randomized query algorithms of two fundamental partial symmetric Boolean functions given a fixed number of queries. 2. We establish that for any total symmetric Boolean function f f , if a quantum algorithm uses T T queries to compute f f with success probability 1/2+β 1 / 2 + β , then there exists a randomized algorithm using O(T2) O ( T 2 ) queries to compute f f with success probability 1/2+Ωδβ2 1 / 2 + Ω δ β 2 on a 1−δ 1 - δ fraction of inputs, where β,δ β , δ can be arbitrarily small positive values. Moreover, we prove a randomized version of Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture (Aaronson & Ambainis 2014) for symmetric Boolean functions in the regime where the success probability of algorithms can be arbitrarily close to 1/2. 3. We present tight polynomial equivalence for several fundamental complexity measures of partial symmetric Boolean functions.
We study the randomized classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation, a cyclic analogue of k-Forrelation [AA15, STOC'15; BS21, STOC'21]. Given k Boolean functions f1,…,fk:F2n→{−1,1}, the goal is to estimate Tk=N−1Tr(Df1H⊗n⋯DfkH⊗n), where Dfi=diag(fi(x):x∈F2n), H is the Hadamard gate, and N=2n. This normalized-trace problem can be solved with k quantum queries in the DQC1 model. Its classical query complexity was left open in [JLS+26, FOCS'26], which conjectured a lower bound of Ω(N1−2/k).
We establish a nearly complete characterization of the nonadaptive classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation. For even k≥4, we prove a tight bound of Θk(N1−2/k) for constant additive error. For odd k≥5, we obtain a lower bound of Ωk(N1−2/(k−1)) and an upper bound of Ok(N1−2/k). Surprisingly, k=3 admits a polylogarithmic-query nonadaptive classical algorithm, disproving the conjecture in this case. These results suggest an unexpected parity-dependent structure: the nonadaptive complexity may be governed by the independence number of the k-cycle, leading to the exponent 1−1/⌊k/2⌋, rather than the previously conjectured 1−2/k, which was motivated by a Fourier-growth heuristic. Finally, allowing adaptivity, we prove a lower bound of Ω(N1/4) for every k≥4.
Although formally close to k-Forrelation, the cyclic structure leads to rather different classical behavior and requires different techniques. Our lower bounds are based on hidden-shift collision constructions, and our upper bounds follow from randomized sampling together with cycle-specific conditional-moment estimates. Our results provide a systematic understanding of its query advantages over classical computation.
This paper explores a fine-grained version of the Watrous conjecture, including the randomized and quantum algorithms with success probabilities arbitrarily close to 1/2. Our contributions include the following: i) An analysis of the optimal success probability of quantum and randomized query algorithms of two fundamental partial symmetric Boolean functions given a fixed number of queries. We prove that for any quantum algorithm computing these two functions using T queries, there exist randomized algorithms using poly(T) queries that achieve the same success probability as the quantum algorithm, even if the success probability is arbitrarily close to 1/2. ii) We establish that for any total symmetric Boolean function f, if a quantum algorithm uses T queries to compute f with success probability 1/2+β, then there exists a randomized algorithm using O(T2) queries to compute f with success probability 1/2+Ω(δβ2) on a 1−δ fraction of inputs, where β,δ can be arbitrarily small positive values. As a corollary, we prove a randomized version of Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture for total symmetric Boolean functions in the regime where the success probability of algorithms can be arbitrarily close to 1/2. iii) We present polynomial equivalences for several fundamental complexity measures of partial symmetric Boolean functions. Specifically, we first prove that for certain partial symmetric Boolean functions, quantum query complexity is at most quadratic in approximate degree for any error arbitrarily close to 1/2. Next, we show exact quantum query complexity is at most quadratic in degree. Additionally, we give the tight bounds of several complexity measures, indicating their polynomial equivalence.