Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Robustness Verification of Quantum Machine Learning

Ji Guan, Fang Wang, Mingsheng Ying

Published Aug 17, 2020• 8 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Several important models of machine learning algorithms have been successfully generalized to the quantum world, with potential applications to data analytics in quantum physics that can be implemented on the near future quantum computers. However, noise and decoherence are two major obstacles to the practical implementation of quantum machine learning. In this work, we introduce a general framework for the robustness analysis of quantum machine learning algorithms against noise and decoherence. We argue that fidelity is the only pick of measuring the robustness. A robust bound is derived and an algorithm is developed to check whether or not a quantum machine learning algorithm is robust with respect to the training data. In particular, this algorithm can help to defense attacks and improve the accuracy as it can identify useful new training data during checking. The effectiveness of our robust bound and algorithm is confirmed by the case study of quantum phase recognition. Furthermore, this experiment demonstrates a trade-off between the accuracy of quantum machine learning algorithms and their robustness.

Related papers

Robustness Verification of Quantum Classifiers

Ji Guan, Wang Sheng Fang, Mingsheng Ying

Abstract Several important models of machine learning algorithms have been successfully generalized to the quantum world, with potential speedup to training classical classifiers and applications to data analytics in quantum physics that can be implemented on the near future quantum computers. However, quantum noise is a major obstacle to the practical implementation of quantum machine learning. In this work, we define a formal framework for the robustness verification and analysis of quantum machine learning algorithms against noises. A robust bound is derived and an algorithm is developed to check whether or not a quantum machine learning algorithm is robust with respect to quantum training data. In particular, this algorithm can find adversarial examples during checking. Our approach is implemented on Google’s TensorFlow Quantum and can verify the robustness of quantum machine learning algorithms with respect to a small disturbance of noises, derived from the surrounding environment. The effectiveness of our robust bound and algorithm is confirmed by the experimental results, including quantum bits classification as the “Hello World” example, quantum phase recognition and cluster excitation detection from real world intractable physical problems, and the classification of MNIST from the classical world.

arXiv:2008.07230•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2021•38 citations

Quantum Machine Learning: Noise Optimization Strategies

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum machine learning (QML) holds significant promise for accelerating and enhancing machine learning tasks. However, the inherent fragility of quantum systems to noise poses a substantial challenge to the successful implementation of QML algorithms. This paper investigates and proposes novel noise optimization strategies specifically tailored for QML. The core claim is to design a strategy capable of effectively handling noise within QML algorithms, ultimately boosting model training accuracy and robustness. The proposed mechanism leverages either the quantum decoherence principle to suppress noise or quantum entanglement mechanisms to mitigate its effects. We explore various approaches, focusing on adaptive noise mitigation techniques and incorporating error correction methodologies within the quantum computation framework. The presented framework aims to improve the reliability of QML algorithms and contribute to the development of practical, robust quantum machine learning systems. The research addresses a critical gap in the field by offering a systematic approach to noise management in QML, a crucial step towards realizing the full potential of this technology. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate that, with appropriate noise optimization, QML algorithms can achieve performance comparable to, or exceeding, classical machine learning algorithms.

•Sep 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum learning with noise and decoherence: a robust quantum neural network

Elizabeth Behrman, Nam Nguyen, James E. Steck

Noise and decoherence are two major obstacles to the implementation of large-scale quantum computing. Because of the no-cloning theorem, which says we cannot make an exact copy of an arbitrary quantum state, simple redundancy will not work in a quantum context, and unwanted interactions with the environment can destroy coherence and thus the quantum nature of the computation. Because of the parallel and distributed nature of classical neural networks, they have long been successfully used to deal with incomplete or damaged data. In this work, we show that our model of a quantum neural network (QNN) is similarly robust to noise, and that, in addition, it is robust to decoherence. Moreover, robustness to noise and decoherence is not only maintained but improved as the size of the system is increased. Noise and decoherence may even be of advantage in training, as it helps correct for overfitting. We demonstrate the robustness using entanglement as a means for pattern storage in a qubit array. Our results provide evidence that machine learning approaches can obviate otherwise recalcitrant problems in quantum computing.

•Dec 19, 2019•3 citations

Quantum learning with noise and decoherence: a robust quantum neural network

Elizabeth Behrman, Nam Nguyen, James E. Steck

Noise and decoherence are two major obstacles to the implementation of large-scale quantum computing. Because of the no-cloning theorem, which says we cannot make an exact copy of an arbitrary quantum state, simple redundancy will not work in a quantum context, and unwanted interactions with the environment can destroy coherence and thus the quantum nature of the computation. Because of the parallel and distributed nature of classical neural networks, they have long been successfully used to deal with incomplete or damaged data. In this work, we show that our model of a quantum neural network (QNN) is similarly robust to noise, and that, in addition, it is robust to decoherence. Moreover, robustness to noise and decoherence is not only maintained but improved as the size of the system is increased. Noise and decoherence may even be of advantage in training, as it helps correct for overfitting. We demonstrate the robustness using entanglement as a means for pattern storage in a qubit array. Our results provide evidence that machine learning approaches can obviate otherwise recalcitrant problems in quantum computing.

•Dec 19, 2019•1 citation

Adversarial robustness guarantees for quantum classifiers

Neil Dowling, Maxwell T. West, Angus Southwell +4 more

Abstract Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.

arXiv:2405.10360•npj Quantum Information•Jan 19, 2026•10 citations

Adversarial Robustness in Quantum Machine Learning: A Scoping Review

Yanche Ari Kustiawan, Khairil Imran Ghauth

Quantum machine learning (QML) is emerging as a promising paradigm at the intersection of quantum computing and artificial intelligence, yet its security under adversarial conditions remains insufficiently understood. This scoping review aims to systematically map empirical research on adversarial robustness in QML and to identify dominant threat models, defense strategies, evaluation approaches, practical constraints, and future research directions. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, four major databases were searched, resulting in 53 eligible empirical studies published between 2020 and 2026. The findings show that most research concentrates on input-level evasion attacks, particularly adversarial examples, and primarily evaluates robustness in classification-oriented models such as variational quantum circuits and quantum neural networks. Defense strategies are largely adapted from classical adversarial training and noise-based mitigation, with limited deployment on real quantum hardware. Robustness assessment is predominantly empirical, relying on accuracy degradation and attack success rate, while formal certification methods remain less common. The literature also highlights substantial constraints related to hardware limitations, NISQ noise, computational cost, and dataset scale. Overall, the evidence indicates that adversarial robustness research in QML is expanding but remains methodologically concentrated, underscoring the need for standardized benchmarking, scalable defenses, and hardware-validated robustness evaluation frameworks.

Computers•Apr 9, 2026•1 citation
Several important models of machine learning algorithms have been successfully generalized to the quantum world, with potential applications to data analytics in quantum physics that can be implemented on the near future quantum computers. However, noise and decoherence are two major obstacles to the practical implementation of quantum machine learning. In this work, we introduce a general framework for the robustness analysis of quantum machine learning algorithms against noise and decoherence. We argue that fidelity is the only pick of measuring the robustness. A robust bound is derived and an algorithm is developed to check whether or not a quantum machine learning algorithm is robust with respect to the training data. In particular, this algorithm can help to defense attacks and improve the accuracy as it can identify useful new training data during checking. The effectiveness of our robust bound and algorithm is confirmed by the case study of quantum phase recognition. Furthermore, this experiment demonstrates a trade-off between the accuracy of quantum machine learning algorithms and their robustness.
Abstract Several important models of machine learning algorithms have been successfully generalized to the quantum world, with potential speedup to training classical classifiers and applications to data analytics in quantum physics that can be implemented on the near future quantum computers. However, quantum noise is a major obstacle to the practical implementation of quantum machine learning. In this work, we define a formal framework for the robustness verification and analysis of quantum machine learning algorithms against noises. A robust bound is derived and an algorithm is developed to check whether or not a quantum machine learning algorithm is robust with respect to quantum training data. In particular, this algorithm can find adversarial examples during checking. Our approach is implemented on Google’s TensorFlow Quantum and can verify the robustness of quantum machine learning algorithms with respect to a small disturbance of noises, derived from the surrounding environment. The effectiveness of our robust bound and algorithm is confirmed by the experimental results, including quantum bits classification as the “Hello World” example, quantum phase recognition and cluster excitation detection from real world intractable physical problems, and the classification of MNIST from the classical world.
Quantum machine learning (QML) holds significant promise for accelerating and enhancing machine learning tasks. However, the inherent fragility of quantum systems to noise poses a substantial challenge to the successful implementation of QML algorithms. This paper investigates and proposes novel noise optimization strategies specifically tailored for QML. The core claim is to design a strategy capable of effectively handling noise within QML algorithms, ultimately boosting model training accuracy and robustness. The proposed mechanism leverages either the quantum decoherence principle to suppress noise or quantum entanglement mechanisms to mitigate its effects. We explore various approaches, focusing on adaptive noise mitigation techniques and incorporating error correction methodologies within the quantum computation framework. The presented framework aims to improve the reliability of QML algorithms and contribute to the development of practical, robust quantum machine learning systems. The research addresses a critical gap in the field by offering a systematic approach to noise management in QML, a crucial step towards realizing the full potential of this technology. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate that, with appropriate noise optimization, QML algorithms can achieve performance comparable to, or exceeding, classical machine learning algorithms.
Noise and decoherence are two major obstacles to the implementation of large-scale quantum computing. Because of the no-cloning theorem, which says we cannot make an exact copy of an arbitrary quantum state, simple redundancy will not work in a quantum context, and unwanted interactions with the environment can destroy coherence and thus the quantum nature of the computation. Because of the parallel and distributed nature of classical neural networks, they have long been successfully used to deal with incomplete or damaged data. In this work, we show that our model of a quantum neural network (QNN) is similarly robust to noise, and that, in addition, it is robust to decoherence. Moreover, robustness to noise and decoherence is not only maintained but improved as the size of the system is increased. Noise and decoherence may even be of advantage in training, as it helps correct for overfitting. We demonstrate the robustness using entanglement as a means for pattern storage in a qubit array. Our results provide evidence that machine learning approaches can obviate otherwise recalcitrant problems in quantum computing.
Noise and decoherence are two major obstacles to the implementation of large-scale quantum computing. Because of the no-cloning theorem, which says we cannot make an exact copy of an arbitrary quantum state, simple redundancy will not work in a quantum context, and unwanted interactions with the environment can destroy coherence and thus the quantum nature of the computation. Because of the parallel and distributed nature of classical neural networks, they have long been successfully used to deal with incomplete or damaged data. In this work, we show that our model of a quantum neural network (QNN) is similarly robust to noise, and that, in addition, it is robust to decoherence. Moreover, robustness to noise and decoherence is not only maintained but improved as the size of the system is increased. Noise and decoherence may even be of advantage in training, as it helps correct for overfitting. We demonstrate the robustness using entanglement as a means for pattern storage in a qubit array. Our results provide evidence that machine learning approaches can obviate otherwise recalcitrant problems in quantum computing.
Abstract Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is emerging as a promising paradigm at the intersection of quantum computing and artificial intelligence, yet its security under adversarial conditions remains insufficiently understood. This scoping review aims to systematically map empirical research on adversarial robustness in QML and to identify dominant threat models, defense strategies, evaluation approaches, practical constraints, and future research directions. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, four major databases were searched, resulting in 53 eligible empirical studies published between 2020 and 2026. The findings show that most research concentrates on input-level evasion attacks, particularly adversarial examples, and primarily evaluates robustness in classification-oriented models such as variational quantum circuits and quantum neural networks. Defense strategies are largely adapted from classical adversarial training and noise-based mitigation, with limited deployment on real quantum hardware. Robustness assessment is predominantly empirical, relying on accuracy degradation and attack success rate, while formal certification methods remain less common. The literature also highlights substantial constraints related to hardware limitations, NISQ noise, computational cost, and dataset scale. Overall, the evidence indicates that adversarial robustness research in QML is expanding but remains methodologically concentrated, underscoring the need for standardized benchmarking, scalable defenses, and hardware-validated robustness evaluation frameworks.