Abstract Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.
Abstract Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.
Abstract Quantum machine learning explores the interplay between machine learning and quantum physics, which may lead to unprecedented perspectives for both fields. In fact, recent works have shown strong evidences that quantum computers could outperform classical computers in solving certain notable machine learning tasks. Yet, quantum learning systems may also suffer from the vulnerability problem: adding a tiny carefully-crafted perturbation to the legitimate input data would cause the systems to make incorrect predictions at a notably high confidence level. In this paper, we study the universality of adversarial examples and perturbations for quantum classifiers. Through concrete examples involving classifications of real-life images and quantum phases of matter, we show that there exist universal adversarial examples that can fool a set of different quantum classifiers. We prove that for a set of k classifiers with each receiving input data of n qubits, an O(2nlnk) increase of the perturbation strength is enough to ensure a moderate universal adversarial risk. In addition, for a given quantum classifier we show that there exist universal adversarial perturbations, which can be added to different legitimate samples and make them to be adversarial examples for the classifier. Our results reveal the universality perspective of adversarial attacks for quantum machine learning systems, which would be crucial for practical applications of both near-term and future quantum technologies in solving machine learning problems.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) fuses quantum computing with machine learning to address complex tasks with potential speedups over classical methods. While QML models such as variational quantum classifiers (QVC), quantum multilayer perceptron(QMLP) models and quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNN) have demonstrated promise in applications like image recognition and malware classification, they remain vulnerable to adversarial threats. Inspired by the vulnerabilities in classical ML, this work systematically investigates how attacks-ranging from training-time poisoning and inferencetime evasion (e.g., quantum versions of FGSM and PGD) to deployment-time trigger attacks-manifest in quantum circuits. We explore how classical adversarial strategies adapt to quantum models through parameterized encodings, hybrid architectures, and probabilistic outputs. The poster evaluates different quantum classifiers under adversarial settings, comparing their robustness, trainability, and resilience to perturbations. Defense mechanisms such as randomized encoding, engineered noise channels, and quantum adversarial training are analyzed in relation to specific threat types. In addition, we assess how quantum models behave differently than classical counterparts under attack, and how quantum-specific design constraints can either exacerbate or mitigate these effects. Our ultimate goal is to define and construct robust QML systems that are both theoretically sound and practically secure. By synthesizing results across multiple QML architectures and threat models, this work provides actionable insight into the development of resilient quantum classifiers, paving the way toward trustworthy and scalable quantum machine learning.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that combines the power of quantum computing with the adaptability of machine learning. QML models have demonstrated potential advantages in solving complex problems across domains such as optimization, pattern recognition, and generative modeling. While much attention has been devoted to exploring their computational benefits and capabilities, the security of QML models and their robustness to adversarial attacks remains an underexplored area in the literature. Understanding adversarial vulnerabilities is critical for assessing the reliability of QML systems, especially as they transition from theoretical constructs to practical applications. In this work, we present an empirical study on the adversarial robustness of QML models. We systematically evaluate the susceptibility of quantum models to adversarial attacks, comparing them with classical counterparts across different settings. Additionally, we examine cross-paradigm attack transferability by testing classical attacks on quantum models and vice versa. Our results indicate that QML models exhibit higher vulnerability in white-box settings and stronger attack transferability than classical ML models. Furthermore, while adversarial training can provide some robustness, its effectiveness remains limited. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of QML security and provide insights into the challenges of building robust QML systems.
Machine learning (ML) methods such as artificial neural networks are rapidly becoming ubiquitous in modern science, technology, and industry. Despite their accuracy and sophistication, neural networks can be easily fooled by carefully designed malicious inputs known as adversarial attacks. While such vulnerabilities remain a serious challenge for classical neural networks, the extent of their existence is not fully understood in the quantum ML setting. In this paper, we benchmark the robustness of quantum ML networks, such as quantum variational classifiers (QVC), at scale by performing rigorous training for both simple and complex image datasets and through a variety of high-end adversarial attacks. Our results show that QVCs offer a notably enhanced robustness against classical adversarial attacks by learning features, which are not detected by the classical neural networks, indicating a possible quantum advantage for ML tasks. Contrarily, and remarkably, the converse is not true, with attacks on quantum networks also capable of deceiving classical neural networks. By combining quantum and classical network outcomes, we propose an adversarial attack detection technology. Traditionally quantum advantage in ML systems has been sought through increased accuracy or algorithmic speed-up, but our study has revealed the potential for a kind of quantum advantage through superior robustness of ML models, whose practical realization will address serious security concerns and reliability issues of ML algorithms employed in a myriad of applications including autonomous vehicles, cybersecurity, and surveillance robotic systems.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is emerging as a promising paradigm at the intersection of quantum computing and artificial intelligence, yet its security under adversarial conditions remains insufficiently understood. This scoping review aims to systematically map empirical research on adversarial robustness in QML and to identify dominant threat models, defense strategies, evaluation approaches, practical constraints, and future research directions. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, four major databases were searched, resulting in 53 eligible empirical studies published between 2020 and 2026. The findings show that most research concentrates on input-level evasion attacks, particularly adversarial examples, and primarily evaluates robustness in classification-oriented models such as variational quantum circuits and quantum neural networks. Defense strategies are largely adapted from classical adversarial training and noise-based mitigation, with limited deployment on real quantum hardware. Robustness assessment is predominantly empirical, relying on accuracy degradation and attack success rate, while formal certification methods remain less common. The literature also highlights substantial constraints related to hardware limitations, NISQ noise, computational cost, and dataset scale. Overall, the evidence indicates that adversarial robustness research in QML is expanding but remains methodologically concentrated, underscoring the need for standardized benchmarking, scalable defenses, and hardware-validated robustness evaluation frameworks.
The interplay between quantum physics and machine learning gives rise to the emergent frontier of quantum machine learning, where advanced quantum learning models may outperform their classical counterparts in solving certain challenging problems. However, quantum learning systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks: adding tiny carefully crafted perturbations on legitimate input samples can cause misclassifications. To address this problem, we propose an effective approach to protect quantum learning systems from adversarial attacks by randomly encoding the legitimate data samples through unitary or quantum error correction encoders that are unknown to the attackers. In particular, we rigorously prove that both global and local random unitary encoders lead to exponentially vanishing gradients (i.e., barren plateaus) for any variational quantum circuits that aim to add adversarial perturbations, independent of the input data and the inner structures of adversarial circuits and quantum classifiers. In addition, we prove a rigorous bound on the vulnerability of quantum classifiers under local unitary adversarial attacks. We show that random black-box quantum error correction encoders can protect quantum classifiers against local adversarial noises and their robustness increases as we concatenate error correction codes. To quantify the robustness enhancement, we adapt quantum differential privacy as a measure of the prediction stability for quantum classifiers. Our results establish versatile defense strategies for quantum classifiers against adversarial perturbations, which provide valuable guidance to enhance the reliability and security for both near-term and future quantum learning technologies. Published by the American Physical Society 2024