The quantum mechanical path integral

Mark S. Swanson

Масуд Чайчиан, A Demichev

The aim of this chapter is to expand the concept of the path integral to quantum mechanics. The Wiener path integral which we considered in chapter 1 and the Feynman path integral in quantum mechanics have many common features. We essentially use this similarity in the first section of the present chapter reducing, in fact, some quantum-mechanical problems to consideration of the Bloch equation and the corresponding Wiener path integral.

Michael C. Ogilvie

Christian Grosche, Frank Steiner

A systematic classification of Feynman path integrals in quantum mechanics is presented and a table of solvable path integrals is given which reflects the progress made during the last 15 years, including, of course, the main contributions since the invention of the path integral by Feynman in 1942. An outline of the general theory is given which will serve as a quick reference for solving path integrals. Explicit formulas for the so-called basic path integrals are presented on which the general scheme to classify and calculate path integrals in quantum mechanics is based.

N. D. Hari Dass

Through a very careful analysis of Dirac's 1932 paper on the Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics as well as the second and third editions of his classic book {\it The Principles of Quantum Mechanics}, I show that Dirac's contributions to the birth of the path-integral approach to quantum mechanics is not restricted to just his seminal demonstration of how Lagrangians appear naturally in quantum mechanics, but that Dirac should be credited for creating a path-integral which I call {\it Dirac path-integral} which is far more general than Feynman's while possessing all its desirable features. On top of it, the Dirac path-integral is fully compatible with the inevitable quantisation ambiguities, while the Feynman path-integral can never have that full consistency. In particular, I show that the claim by Feynman that for infinitesimal time intervals, what Dirac thought were analogues were actually proportional can not be correct always. I have also shown the conection between Dirac path-integrals and the Schrödinger equation. In particular, it is shown that each choice of Dirac path-integral yields a {\it quantum Hamiltonian} that is generically different from what the Feynman path-integral gives, and that all of them have the same {\it classical analogue}. Dirac's method of demonstrating the least action principle for classical mechanics generalizes in a most straightforward way to all the generalized path-integrals.