Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)

What Is the Optimal Annealing Schedule in Quantum Annealing

Oscar Galindo, Владик Крейнович

Published Dec 1, 2020• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In many real-life situations in engineering (and in other disciplines), we need to solve an optimization problem: we want an optimal design, we want an optimal control, etc. One of the main problems in optimization is avoiding local maxima (or minima). One of the techniques that helps with solving this problem is annealing: whenever we find ourselves in a possibly local maximum, we jump out with some probability and continue search for the true optimum. A natural way to organize such a probabilistic perturbation of the deterministic optimization is to use quantum effects. It turns out that often, quantum annealing works much better than non-quantum one. Quantum annealing is the main technique behind the only commercially available computational devices that use quantum effects-D-Wave computers. The efficiency of quantum annealing depends on the proper selection of the annealing schedule, i.e., schedule that describes how the perturbations decrease with time. Empirically, it has been found that two schedules work best: power law and exponential ones. In this paper, we provide a theoretical explanation for these empirical successes, by proving that these two schedules are indeed optimal (in some reasonable sense).

DOI
10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308407

Related papers

Optimal solving of a scheduling problem using quantum annealing metaheuristics on the D-Wave quantum solver

Wojciech Bożejko, Ryszard Klempous, Jarosław Pempera +4 more

This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. The main disadvantage of calculations on quantum computers is their non-determinism. For optimization problems, of course, it is possible to get surprisingly good results but without a guarantee of the actual optimality of the result, i.e, an assurance that there exists no better solution which could potentially be found by the quantum machine. In this paper, we propose an novel approach that provides such a guarantee of optimality. We generate a solution that is optimal in the strict mathematical sense, without probabilistic considerations. To accomplish this, we use the D-Wave quantum machine working as a sampler implementing quantum annealing -- an approach considered a hardware metaheuristic -- to obtain upper and lower bounds on the value of the objective function of the problem under consideration. Then, we use the Branch and Bound scheme controlled by quantum annealing. This allows us to obtain very quickly -- in constant time -- the boundaries of the considered subproblems. Our approach is a combination of calculations realized on a quantum machine controlled by procedures implemented on a classical computer, allowing us to generate optimal solutions to the NP-hard problems of task scheduling on a single machine with a total weighted tardiness criterion. The proposed quantum algorithm shows a significant advantage over the classical CPU approach both in terms of calculation time and the number of generated solution tree nodes.

•Apr 26, 2023•0 citations

Using Quantum Annealing to Solve Large-Scale Optimization Problems in Logistics and Scheduling

Sandeep Kumar

In planning and scheduling, large-scale optimization problems often have complex limits and a lot of factors, which makes them hard to answer with standard methods. Quantum annealing has become a hopeful way to deal with these problems because it can quickly look into a lot of possible solutions. This essay looks into how quantum annealing might be used to solve optimization problems in transportation and scheduling, with a focus on how it could be used for route planning, inventory management, and arranging workers. To do these optimization jobs, quantum annealing is used. This is a quantum computing method that gets the global minimum of a cost function. We use the D-Wave quantum annealer in this method. It turns the problem's limits and objective function into a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model. The quantum annealer then works on this model to find the best answers. The suggested method combines traditional preparation methods with quantum annealing to get the best results for big schedule and transportation issues. We use quantum annealing to solve difficult multi-objective optimization problems, like reducing shipping time, cost, and resource use all at the same time. Preliminary results show that quantum annealing can make solutions much better and use computers much more efficiently than traditional methods for optimizing supplies and schedules. Quantum annealing works especially well with problems that have a lot of dimensions. It can provide scalable answers that sometimes work better than standard methods.

International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)•Mar 5, 2025•0 citations

Optimizing Quantum Annealing Schedules: From Monte Carlo Tree Search to QuantumZero

Yuqin Chen, Yu Chen, Chee‐Kong Lee +2 more

Quantum annealing is a practical approach to execute the native instruction set of the adiabatic quantum computation model. The key of running adiabatic algorithms is to maintain a high success probability of evolving the system into the ground state of a problem-encoded Hamiltonian at the end of an annealing schedule. This is typically done by executing the adiabatic algorithm slowly to enforce adiabacity. However, properly optimized annealing schedule can accelerate the computational process. Inspired by the recent success of DeepMind's AlphaZero algorithm that can efficiently explore and find a good winning strategy from a large combinatorial search with a neural-network-assisted Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), we adopt MCTS and propose a neural-network-enabled version, termed QuantumZero (QZero), to automate the design of an optimal annealing schedule in a hybrid quantum-classical framework. The flexibility of having neural networks allows us to apply transfer-learning technique to boost QZero's performance. We find both MCTS and QZero to perform very well in finding excellent annealing schedules even when the annealing time is short in the 3-SAT examples we consider in this study. We also find MCTS and QZero to be more efficient than many other leading reinforcement leanring algorithms for the task of desining annealing schedules. In particular, if there is a need to solve a large set of similar problems using a quantum annealer, QZero is the method of choice when the neural networks are first pre-trained with examples solved in the past.

•Apr 6, 2020•4 citations

Designing quantum annealing schedules using Bayesian optimization

Jernej Rudi Finžgar, Martin J. A. Schuetz, John Kyle Brubaker +2 more

We propose and analyze the use of Bayesian optimization techniques to design quantum annealing schedules with minimal user and resource requirements. We showcase our scheme with results for two paradigmatic spin models. We find that Bayesian optimization is able to identify schedules resulting in fidelities several orders of magnitude better than standard protocols for both quantum and reverse annealing, as applied to the p -spin model. We also show that our scheme can help improve the design of hybrid quantum algorithms for hard combinatorial optimization problems, such as the maximum independent set problem, and illustrate these results via experiments on a neutral-atom quantum processor available on Amazon Braket. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2305.13365•Physical Review Research•Apr 18, 2024•30 citations

Quantum and classical annealing in a continuous space with multiple local minima

Yang Wei Koh, Hidetoshi Nishimori

The protocol of quantum annealing is applied to an optimization problem with a one-dimensional continuous degree of freedom, a variant of the problem proposed by Shinomoto and Kabashima. The energy landscape has a number of local minima, and the classical approach of simulated annealing is predicted to have a logarithmically slow convergence to the global minimum. We show by extensive numerical analyses that quantum annealing yields a power-law convergence, thus an exponential improvement over simulated annealing. The power is larger, and thus the convergence is faster, than a prediction by an existing phenomenological theory for this problem. Performance of simulated annealing is shown to be enhanced by introducing quasiglobal searches across energy barriers, leading to a power-law convergence but with a smaller power than in the quantum case and thus a slower convergence classically even with quasiglobal search processes. We also reveal how diabatic quantum dynamics, quantum tunneling in particular, steers the systems toward the global minimum by a meticulous choice of annealing schedule. This latter result explicitly contrasts the role of tunneling in quantum annealing against the classical counterpart of stochastic optimization by simulated annealing.

arXiv:2203.11417•Physical Review A•Jun 21, 2022•13 citations

Diabatic quantum annealing for the frustrated ring model

Jeremy Côté, Frédéric Sauvage, Martín Larocca +3 more

Abstract Quantum annealing (QA) is a continuous-time heuristic quantum algorithm for solving or approximately solving classical optimization problems. The algorithm uses a schedule to interpolate between a driver Hamiltonian with an easy-to-prepare ground state and a problem Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes solutions to an optimization problem. The standard implementation relies on the evolution being adiabatic: keeping the system in the instantaneous ground state with high probability and requiring a time scale inversely related to the minimum energy gap between the instantaneous ground and excited states. However, adiabatic evolution can lead to evolution times that scale exponentially with the system size, even for computationally simple problems. Here, we study whether non-adiabatic evolutions with optimized annealing schedules can bypass this exponential slowdown for one such class of problems called the frustrated ring model. For sufficiently optimized annealing schedules and system sizes of up to 39 qubits, we provide numerical evidence that we can avoid the exponential slowdown. Our work highlights the potential of highly-controllable QA to circumvent bottlenecks associated with the standard implementation of QA.

arXiv:2212.02624•Quantum Science and Technology•Sep 20, 2023•14 citations
In many real-life situations in engineering (and in other disciplines), we need to solve an optimization problem: we want an optimal design, we want an optimal control, etc. One of the main problems in optimization is avoiding local maxima (or minima). One of the techniques that helps with solving this problem is annealing: whenever we find ourselves in a possibly local maximum, we jump out with some probability and continue search for the true optimum. A natural way to organize such a probabilistic perturbation of the deterministic optimization is to use quantum effects. It turns out that often, quantum annealing works much better than non-quantum one. Quantum annealing is the main technique behind the only commercially available computational devices that use quantum effects-D-Wave computers. The efficiency of quantum annealing depends on the proper selection of the annealing schedule, i.e., schedule that describes how the perturbations decrease with time. Empirically, it has been found that two schedules work best: power law and exponential ones. In this paper, we provide a theoretical explanation for these empirical successes, by proving that these two schedules are indeed optimal (in some reasonable sense).
This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. The main disadvantage of calculations on quantum computers is their non-determinism. For optimization problems, of course, it is possible to get surprisingly good results but without a guarantee of the actual optimality of the result, i.e, an assurance that there exists no better solution which could potentially be found by the quantum machine. In this paper, we propose an novel approach that provides such a guarantee of optimality. We generate a solution that is optimal in the strict mathematical sense, without probabilistic considerations. To accomplish this, we use the D-Wave quantum machine working as a sampler implementing quantum annealing -- an approach considered a hardware metaheuristic -- to obtain upper and lower bounds on the value of the objective function of the problem under consideration. Then, we use the Branch and Bound scheme controlled by quantum annealing. This allows us to obtain very quickly -- in constant time -- the boundaries of the considered subproblems. Our approach is a combination of calculations realized on a quantum machine controlled by procedures implemented on a classical computer, allowing us to generate optimal solutions to the NP-hard problems of task scheduling on a single machine with a total weighted tardiness criterion. The proposed quantum algorithm shows a significant advantage over the classical CPU approach both in terms of calculation time and the number of generated solution tree nodes.
In planning and scheduling, large-scale optimization problems often have complex limits and a lot of factors, which makes them hard to answer with standard methods. Quantum annealing has become a hopeful way to deal with these problems because it can quickly look into a lot of possible solutions. This essay looks into how quantum annealing might be used to solve optimization problems in transportation and scheduling, with a focus on how it could be used for route planning, inventory management, and arranging workers. To do these optimization jobs, quantum annealing is used. This is a quantum computing method that gets the global minimum of a cost function. We use the D-Wave quantum annealer in this method. It turns the problem's limits and objective function into a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model. The quantum annealer then works on this model to find the best answers. The suggested method combines traditional preparation methods with quantum annealing to get the best results for big schedule and transportation issues. We use quantum annealing to solve difficult multi-objective optimization problems, like reducing shipping time, cost, and resource use all at the same time. Preliminary results show that quantum annealing can make solutions much better and use computers much more efficiently than traditional methods for optimizing supplies and schedules. Quantum annealing works especially well with problems that have a lot of dimensions. It can provide scalable answers that sometimes work better than standard methods.
Quantum annealing is a practical approach to execute the native instruction set of the adiabatic quantum computation model. The key of running adiabatic algorithms is to maintain a high success probability of evolving the system into the ground state of a problem-encoded Hamiltonian at the end of an annealing schedule. This is typically done by executing the adiabatic algorithm slowly to enforce adiabacity. However, properly optimized annealing schedule can accelerate the computational process. Inspired by the recent success of DeepMind's AlphaZero algorithm that can efficiently explore and find a good winning strategy from a large combinatorial search with a neural-network-assisted Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), we adopt MCTS and propose a neural-network-enabled version, termed QuantumZero (QZero), to automate the design of an optimal annealing schedule in a hybrid quantum-classical framework. The flexibility of having neural networks allows us to apply transfer-learning technique to boost QZero's performance. We find both MCTS and QZero to perform very well in finding excellent annealing schedules even when the annealing time is short in the 3-SAT examples we consider in this study. We also find MCTS and QZero to be more efficient than many other leading reinforcement leanring algorithms for the task of desining annealing schedules. In particular, if there is a need to solve a large set of similar problems using a quantum annealer, QZero is the method of choice when the neural networks are first pre-trained with examples solved in the past.
We propose and analyze the use of Bayesian optimization techniques to design quantum annealing schedules with minimal user and resource requirements. We showcase our scheme with results for two paradigmatic spin models. We find that Bayesian optimization is able to identify schedules resulting in fidelities several orders of magnitude better than standard protocols for both quantum and reverse annealing, as applied to the p -spin model. We also show that our scheme can help improve the design of hybrid quantum algorithms for hard combinatorial optimization problems, such as the maximum independent set problem, and illustrate these results via experiments on a neutral-atom quantum processor available on Amazon Braket. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
The protocol of quantum annealing is applied to an optimization problem with a one-dimensional continuous degree of freedom, a variant of the problem proposed by Shinomoto and Kabashima. The energy landscape has a number of local minima, and the classical approach of simulated annealing is predicted to have a logarithmically slow convergence to the global minimum. We show by extensive numerical analyses that quantum annealing yields a power-law convergence, thus an exponential improvement over simulated annealing. The power is larger, and thus the convergence is faster, than a prediction by an existing phenomenological theory for this problem. Performance of simulated annealing is shown to be enhanced by introducing quasiglobal searches across energy barriers, leading to a power-law convergence but with a smaller power than in the quantum case and thus a slower convergence classically even with quasiglobal search processes. We also reveal how diabatic quantum dynamics, quantum tunneling in particular, steers the systems toward the global minimum by a meticulous choice of annealing schedule. This latter result explicitly contrasts the role of tunneling in quantum annealing against the classical counterpart of stochastic optimization by simulated annealing.
Abstract Quantum annealing (QA) is a continuous-time heuristic quantum algorithm for solving or approximately solving classical optimization problems. The algorithm uses a schedule to interpolate between a driver Hamiltonian with an easy-to-prepare ground state and a problem Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes solutions to an optimization problem. The standard implementation relies on the evolution being adiabatic: keeping the system in the instantaneous ground state with high probability and requiring a time scale inversely related to the minimum energy gap between the instantaneous ground and excited states. However, adiabatic evolution can lead to evolution times that scale exponentially with the system size, even for computationally simple problems. Here, we study whether non-adiabatic evolutions with optimized annealing schedules can bypass this exponential slowdown for one such class of problems called the frustrated ring model. For sufficiently optimized annealing schedules and system sizes of up to 39 qubits, we provide numerical evidence that we can avoid the exponential slowdown. Our work highlights the potential of highly-controllable QA to circumvent bottlenecks associated with the standard implementation of QA.