Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2305.13365 · Physical Review Research

Designing quantum annealing schedules using Bayesian optimization

Jernej Rudi Finžgar, Martin J. A. Schuetz, John Kyle Brubaker, Hidetoshi Nishimori, Helmut G. Katzgraber

Published Apr 18, 2024• 30 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose and analyze the use of Bayesian optimization techniques to design quantum annealing schedules with minimal user and resource requirements. We showcase our scheme with results for two paradigmatic spin models. We find that Bayesian optimization is able to identify schedules resulting in fidelities several orders of magnitude better than standard protocols for both quantum and reverse annealing, as applied to the p -spin model. We also show that our scheme can help improve the design of hybrid quantum algorithms for hard combinatorial optimization problems, such as the maximum independent set problem, and illustrate these results via experiments on a neutral-atom quantum processor available on Amazon Braket. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

DOI
10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023063

Related papers

Trust Region Bayesian Optimization of Annealing Schedules on a Quantum Annealer

Seon-Geun Jeong, Cong, Mai Dinh, Minh-Duong Nguyen +3 more

Quantum annealing (QA) is a practical model of adiabatic quantum computation, already realized on hardware and considered promising for combinatorial optimization. However, its performance is critically dependent on the annealing schedule due to hardware decoherence and noise. Designing schedules that account for such limitations remains a significant challenge. We propose a trust region Bayesian optimization (TuRBO) framework that jointly tunes annealing time and Fourier-parameterized schedules. Given a fixed embedding on a quantum processing unit (QPU), the framework employs Gaussian process surrogates with expected improvement to balance exploration and exploitation, while trust region updates refine the search around promising candidates. The framework further incorporates mechanisms to manage QPU runtime and enforce feasibility under hardware constraints efficiently. Simulation studies demonstrate that TuRBO consistently identifies schedules that outperform random and greedy search in terms of energy, feasible solution probability, and chain break fraction. These results highlight TuRBO as a resource-efficient and scalable strategy for annealing schedule design, offering improved QA performance in noisy intermediate-scale quantum regimes and extensibility to industrial optimization tasks.

arXiv:2510.15245•Oct 17, 2025•0 citations

What Is the Optimal Annealing Schedule in Quantum Annealing

Oscar Galindo, Владик Крейнович

In many real-life situations in engineering (and in other disciplines), we need to solve an optimization problem: we want an optimal design, we want an optimal control, etc. One of the main problems in optimization is avoiding local maxima (or minima). One of the techniques that helps with solving this problem is annealing: whenever we find ourselves in a possibly local maximum, we jump out with some probability and continue search for the true optimum. A natural way to organize such a probabilistic perturbation of the deterministic optimization is to use quantum effects. It turns out that often, quantum annealing works much better than non-quantum one. Quantum annealing is the main technique behind the only commercially available computational devices that use quantum effects-D-Wave computers. The efficiency of quantum annealing depends on the proper selection of the annealing schedule, i.e., schedule that describes how the perturbations decrease with time. Empirically, it has been found that two schedules work best: power law and exponential ones. In this paper, we provide a theoretical explanation for these empirical successes, by proving that these two schedules are indeed optimal (in some reasonable sense).

IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)•Dec 1, 2020•11 citations

Optimization by quantum annealing: Lessons from hard satisfiability problems

Demian A. Battaglia, Giuseppe E. Santoro, Erio Tosatti

The path integral Monte Carlo simulated quantum annealing algorithm is applied to the optimization of a large hard instance of the random satisfiability problem (N = 10,000). The dynamical behavior of the quantum and the classical annealing are compared, showing important qualitative differences in the way of exploring the complex energy landscape of the combinatorial optimization problem. At variance with the results obtained for the Ising spin glass and for the traveling salesman problem, in the present case the linear-schedule quantum annealing performance is definitely worse than classical annealing. Nevertheless, a quantum cooling protocol based on field-cycling and able to outperform standard classical simulated annealing over short time scales is introduced.

arXiv:cond-mat/0502468•Physical Review E•Jun 29, 2005•107 citations

Implementing transferable annealing protocols for combinatorial optimization on neutral-atom quantum processors: A case study on smart charging of electric vehicles

Lucas Leclerc, Constantin Dalyac, Pascale Bendotti +3 more

In the quantum optimization paradigm, variational quantum algorithms face challenges with hardware-specific and instance-dependent parameter tuning, which can lead to computational inefficiencies. The promising potential of parameter transferability across problem instances with similar local structures has been demonstrated in the context of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. In this paper we build on these advancements by extending the concept to annealing-based protocols, employing Bayesian optimization to design robust quasiadiabatic schedules. Our study reveals that, for maximum independent set problems on graph families with shared geometries, optimal parameters naturally concentrate, enabling efficient transferability between similar instances and from smaller to larger ones. Experimental results on the Orion Alpha platform validate the effectiveness of our approach, scaling to problems with up to 100 qubits. We apply this method to address a smart-charging optimization problem on a real dataset. These findings highlight a scalable, resource-efficient path for hybrid optimization strategies applicable in real-world scenarios.

arXiv:2411.16656•Physical Review A•Mar 18, 2025•7 citations

Quantum Annealing for Combinatorial Optimization: Foundations, Architectures, Benchmarks, and Emerging Directions

Rudraksh Sharma

Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology•Mar 10, 2026•1 citation

Quantum-Enhanced Optimization for Bayesian Networks

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum-enhanced optimization is a burgeoning field with the potential to revolutionize various computational tasks, particularly those involving complex data structures like Bayesian networks. This paper explores the application of quantum optimization algorithms to Bayesian network inference, aiming to enhance efficiency and accuracy. We investigate the integration of quantum annealing and quantum approximate optimization algorithms to address the inherent computational challenges associated with Bayesian network modeling. This work presents a novel methodology for leveraging quantum mechanics to accelerate the process of parameter estimation and structure exploration within Bayesian networks. The core claim is that this integration will yield significant improvements in inference performance compared to classical methods, especially for large and complex networks. This paper details the theoretical framework, experimental validation, and initial results demonstrating the feasibility and potential impact of this approach.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations
We propose and analyze the use of Bayesian optimization techniques to design quantum annealing schedules with minimal user and resource requirements. We showcase our scheme with results for two paradigmatic spin models. We find that Bayesian optimization is able to identify schedules resulting in fidelities several orders of magnitude better than standard protocols for both quantum and reverse annealing, as applied to the p -spin model. We also show that our scheme can help improve the design of hybrid quantum algorithms for hard combinatorial optimization problems, such as the maximum independent set problem, and illustrate these results via experiments on a neutral-atom quantum processor available on Amazon Braket. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Quantum annealing (QA) is a practical model of adiabatic quantum computation, already realized on hardware and considered promising for combinatorial optimization. However, its performance is critically dependent on the annealing schedule due to hardware decoherence and noise. Designing schedules that account for such limitations remains a significant challenge. We propose a trust region Bayesian optimization (TuRBO) framework that jointly tunes annealing time and Fourier-parameterized schedules. Given a fixed embedding on a quantum processing unit (QPU), the framework employs Gaussian process surrogates with expected improvement to balance exploration and exploitation, while trust region updates refine the search around promising candidates. The framework further incorporates mechanisms to manage QPU runtime and enforce feasibility under hardware constraints efficiently. Simulation studies demonstrate that TuRBO consistently identifies schedules that outperform random and greedy search in terms of energy, feasible solution probability, and chain break fraction. These results highlight TuRBO as a resource-efficient and scalable strategy for annealing schedule design, offering improved QA performance in noisy intermediate-scale quantum regimes and extensibility to industrial optimization tasks.
In many real-life situations in engineering (and in other disciplines), we need to solve an optimization problem: we want an optimal design, we want an optimal control, etc. One of the main problems in optimization is avoiding local maxima (or minima). One of the techniques that helps with solving this problem is annealing: whenever we find ourselves in a possibly local maximum, we jump out with some probability and continue search for the true optimum. A natural way to organize such a probabilistic perturbation of the deterministic optimization is to use quantum effects. It turns out that often, quantum annealing works much better than non-quantum one. Quantum annealing is the main technique behind the only commercially available computational devices that use quantum effects-D-Wave computers. The efficiency of quantum annealing depends on the proper selection of the annealing schedule, i.e., schedule that describes how the perturbations decrease with time. Empirically, it has been found that two schedules work best: power law and exponential ones. In this paper, we provide a theoretical explanation for these empirical successes, by proving that these two schedules are indeed optimal (in some reasonable sense).
The path integral Monte Carlo simulated quantum annealing algorithm is applied to the optimization of a large hard instance of the random satisfiability problem (N = 10,000). The dynamical behavior of the quantum and the classical annealing are compared, showing important qualitative differences in the way of exploring the complex energy landscape of the combinatorial optimization problem. At variance with the results obtained for the Ising spin glass and for the traveling salesman problem, in the present case the linear-schedule quantum annealing performance is definitely worse than classical annealing. Nevertheless, a quantum cooling protocol based on field-cycling and able to outperform standard classical simulated annealing over short time scales is introduced.
In the quantum optimization paradigm, variational quantum algorithms face challenges with hardware-specific and instance-dependent parameter tuning, which can lead to computational inefficiencies. The promising potential of parameter transferability across problem instances with similar local structures has been demonstrated in the context of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. In this paper we build on these advancements by extending the concept to annealing-based protocols, employing Bayesian optimization to design robust quasiadiabatic schedules. Our study reveals that, for maximum independent set problems on graph families with shared geometries, optimal parameters naturally concentrate, enabling efficient transferability between similar instances and from smaller to larger ones. Experimental results on the Orion Alpha platform validate the effectiveness of our approach, scaling to problems with up to 100 qubits. We apply this method to address a smart-charging optimization problem on a real dataset. These findings highlight a scalable, resource-efficient path for hybrid optimization strategies applicable in real-world scenarios.
Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization
Quantum-enhanced optimization is a burgeoning field with the potential to revolutionize various computational tasks, particularly those involving complex data structures like Bayesian networks. This paper explores the application of quantum optimization algorithms to Bayesian network inference, aiming to enhance efficiency and accuracy. We investigate the integration of quantum annealing and quantum approximate optimization algorithms to address the inherent computational challenges associated with Bayesian network modeling. This work presents a novel methodology for leveraging quantum mechanics to accelerate the process of parameter estimation and structure exploration within Bayesian networks. The core claim is that this integration will yield significant improvements in inference performance compared to classical methods, especially for large and complex networks. This paper details the theoretical framework, experimental validation, and initial results demonstrating the feasibility and potential impact of this approach.