We develop a framework for characterizing and analyzing engineered likelihood functions (ELFs), which play an important role in the task of estimating the expectation values of quantum observables. These ELFs are obtained by choosing tunable parameters in a parametrized quantum circuit that minimize the expected posterior variance of an estimated parameter. We derive analytical expressions for the likelihood functions arising from certain classes of quantum circuits and use these expressions to pick optimal ELF tunable parameters. Finally, we show applications of ELFs in the Bayesian inference framework.
We develop a framework for characterizing and analyzing engineered likelihood functions (ELFs), which play an important role in the task of estimating the expectation values of quantum observables. These ELFs are obtained by choosing tunable parameters in a parametrized quantum circuit that minimize the expected posterior variance of an estimated parameter. We derive analytical expressions for the likelihood functions arising from certain classes of quantum circuits and use these expressions to pick optimal ELF tunable parameters. Finally, we show applications of ELFs in the Bayesian inference framework.
We present mathematical and conceptual foundations for the task of robust amplitude estimation using engineered likelihood functions (ELFs), a framework introduced by Wang et al. [PRX Quantum 2, 010346 (2021)] that uses Bayesian inference to enhance the rate of information gain in quantum sampling. These ELFs, which are obtained by choosing tunable parameters in a parametrized quantum circuit to minimize the expected posterior variance of an estimated parameter, play an important role in estimating the expectation values of quantum observables. We give a thorough characterization and analysis of likelihood functions arising from certain classes of quantum circuits and combine this with the tools of Bayesian inference to give a procedure for picking optimal ELF tunable parameters. Finally, we present numerical results to demonstrate the performance of ELFs.
The number of measurements demanded by hybrid quantum-classical algorithms such as the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is prohibitively high for many problems of practical value. Quantum algorithms that reduce this cost (e.g. quantum amplitude and phase estimation) require error rates that are too low for near-term implementation. Here we propose methods that take advantage of the available quantum coherence to maximally enhance the power of sampling on noisy quantum devices, reducing measurement number and runtime compared to VQE. Our scheme derives inspiration from quantum metrology, phase estimation, and the more recent alpha-VQE proposal, arriving at a general formulation that is robust to error and does not require ancilla qubits. The central object of this method is what we call the engineered likelihood function (ELF), used for carrying out Bayesian inference. We show how the ELF formalism enhances the rate of information gain in sampling as the physical hardware transitions from the regime of noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers into that of quantum error corrected ones. This technique speeds up a central component of many quantum algorithms, with applications including chemistry, materials, finance, and beyond. Similar to VQE, we expect small-scale implementations to be realizable on today's quantum devices.
The number of measurements demanded by hybrid quantum-classical algorithms such as the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is prohibitively high for many problems of practical value.For such problems, realizing quantum advantage will require methods that dramatically reduce this cost.Previous quantum algorithms that reduce the measurement cost (e.g., quantum amplitude and phase estimation) require error rates that are too low for near-term implementation.Here we propose methods that take advantage of the available quantum coherence to maximally enhance the power of sampling on noisy quantum devices, reducing the measurement number and runtime compared to the standard sampling method of the VQE.Our scheme derives inspiration from quantum metrology, phase estimation, and the more recent "alpha-VQE" proposal, arriving at a general formulation that is robust to error and does not require ancilla qubits.The central object of this method is what we call the "engineered likelihood function" (ELF), used for carrying out Bayesian inference.We show how the ELF formalism enhances the rate of information gain in sampling as the physical hardware transitions from the regime of noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers to that of quantum error-corrected ones.This technique speeds up a central component of many quantum algorithms, with applications including chemistry, materials, finance, and beyond.Similar to the VQE, we expect small-scale implementations to be realizable on today's quantum devices.
Models of quantum systems faithfully map system parameters to observations, but the inverse problem of parameter inference from measurement data presents a fundamental challenge: computationally intractable likelihoods due to an exponentially large Hilbert space. Here, we introduce simulation-based quantum system inference, a unified, likelihood-free framework that learns parameter posteriors directly from classical simulation data. The central idea is to pair polynomial-cost classical simulators, such as Pauli propagation and tensor networks, with normalizing flows or other neural density estimators for accurate, reusable inference. A single model, trained once, maps any new measurement record to its posterior in one forward pass---turning per-experiment inference into a fixed, up-front cost. We numerically demonstrate the framework's versatility across Pauli noise learning, quantum error mitigation, quantum state tomography, and Hamiltonian learning, with examples involving 81-qubit shallow circuits and 735-parameter inference. In each case, the approach yields accurate estimates of identifiable parameters, while posterior uncertainty provides additional diagnostics of non-identifiability and indicates where further characterization is needed. Our framework reduces data-acquisition requirements in quantum experiments and accelerates parameter inference, providing a practical route to characterizing and improving large-scale quantum systems.
Estimating properties of quantum states, such as fidelities, molecular energies, and correlation functions, is a fundamental task in quantum information science. Due to the limitation of practical quantum devices, including limited circuit depth and connectivity, estimating even linear properties encounters high sample complexity. To address this inefficiency, we propose a framework that optimizes sample complexity for estimating the expectation value of any observable using a shallow parameterized quantum circuit. Within this framework, we introduce two decomposition algorithms, a tensor network approach and a greedy projection approach that decompose the target observable into a linear combination of multiple observables, each of which can be diagonalized with the shallow circuit. Using this decomposition, we then apply an importance sampling algorithm to estimate the expectation value of the target observable. We numerically demonstrate the performance of our algorithm by estimating the expectation values of some specific Hamiltonians and inner product of a Slater determinant with a pure state, highlighting advantages compared to some conventional methods. Additionally, we derive the fundamental lower bound for the sample complexity required to estimate a target observable using a given shallow quantum circuit, thereby enhancing our understanding of the capabilities of shallow circuits in quantum learning tasks.
Accurately inferring the state of a quantum device from the results of measurements is a crucial task in building quantum information processing hardware. The predominant state estimation procedure, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), generally reports an estimate with zero eigenvalues. These cannot be justified. Furthermore, the MLE estimate is incompatible with error bars, so conclusions drawn from it are suspect. I propose an alternative procedure, Bayesian mean estimation (BME). BME never yields zero eigenvalues, its eigenvalues provide a bound on their own uncertainties, and under certain circumstances it is provably the most accurate procedure possible. I show how to implement BME numerically, and how to obtain natural error bars that are compatible with the estimate. Finally, I briefly discuss the differences between Bayesian and frequentist estimation techniques.