Efficient Secure Comparison Protocols.

Takumi Kobayashi, Keisuke Hakuta

R. Katti, Cristinel Ababei

We propose an efficient protocol for secure comparison of integers when both integers are shared between two parties. Such protocols are useful for implementing secure auctions. The proposed protocol's computational complexity is roughly half the complexity of the best known efficient protocol. The efficiency of the proposed protocol stems from the removal of the XOR computation which is a time consuming operation.

Tushar Kanti Saha, Takeshi Koshiba

Luo -, Yonglong, Huang +5 more

Ali Ataeemh Allami

Secure comparison (SC) is an essential primitive in Secure Multiparty Computation (SMC) and a fundamental building block in Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics (PPDA). Although secure comparison has been studied since the introduction of SMC in the early 80s and many protocols have been proposed, there is still room for improvement, especially providing security against malicious adversaries who form the majority among the participating parties. It is not hard to develop an SC protocol secure against malicious majority based on the current state-of-the-art SPDZ framework. SPDZ is designed to work for arbitrary polynomially-bounded functionalities; it may not provide the most efficient SMC implementation for a specific task, such as SC. In this thesis, we propose a novel and efficient compiler specifically designed to convert most existing SC protocols with semi-honest security into the ones secure against the dishonest majority (malicious majority). We analyze the security of the proposed solutions using the real-ideal paradigm. Moreover, we provide computation and communication complexity analysis. Comparing to the current state-of-the-art SC protocols Rabbit and edaBits, our design offers significant performance gain. The empirical results show that the proposed solution is at least 5 and 10 times more efficient than Rabbit in run-time and communication cost respectively.

Linming Gong, Shundong Li, Chunying Wu +1 more

Many privacy protections in distributed setting are based on secure comparison, according to which two distrusted users try to jointly determine whether a > b, a = b, or a1)/(kb + k1)), which implies the potential relationship (a > b, a = b, and a1, and b belong to the party who doesn't have the secret of the system. Based on this system, two distrusted users in distributed setting can learn whether a > b, a = b, or a <; b in one execution, without disclosing a and b to each other. Then, we develop two efficient protocols for secure comparison on integers and secure comparison on fractions, respectively. Our schemes, based on homomorphic encryption, are cryptographically secure. We prove that these protocols are secure using simulation paradigm. Our approaches can be used in many secure multi-party computation protocols that involve fractions, rational numbers, and integers. They can also be more convenient to solve some secure multiparty computational geometry problems that often involve ratio evaluation.