We propose an efficient protocol for secure comparison of integers when both integers are shared between two parties. Such protocols are useful for implementing secure auctions. The proposed protocol's computational complexity is roughly half the complexity of the best known efficient protocol. The efficiency of the proposed protocol stems from the removal of the XOR computation which is a time consuming operation.
We propose an efficient protocol for secure comparison of integers when both integers are shared between two parties. Such protocols are useful for implementing secure auctions. The proposed protocol's computational complexity is roughly half the complexity of the best known efficient protocol. The efficiency of the proposed protocol stems from the removal of the XOR computation which is a time consuming operation.
Secure two-party comparison plays a crucial role in many privacy-preserving applications, such as privacy-preserving data mining and machine learning. In particular, the available comparison protocols with the appropriate input/output configuration have a significant impact on the performance of these applications. In this paper, we firstly describe a taxonomy of secure two-party comparison protocols which allows us to describe the different configurations used for these protocols in a systematic manner. This taxonomy leads to a total of 216 types of comparison protocols.We then describe conversions among these types. While these conversions are based on known techniques and have explicitly or implicitly been considered previously, we show that a combination of these conversion techniques can be used to convert a perhaps less-known two-party comparison protocol by Nergiz et al. (IEEE SocialCom 2010) into a very efficient protocol in a configuration where the two parties hold shares of the values being compared, and obtain a share of the comparison result. This setting is often used in multi-party computation protocols, and hence in many privacy-preserving applications as well. We furthermore implement the protocol and measure its performance. Our measurement suggests that the protocol outperforms the previously proposed protocols for this input/output configuration, when off-line pre-computation is not permitted.
We propose a solution to the secure integer comparison problem by reducing it to the secure set membership problem on a set where the elements occur in consecutive order. Our protocol provides flexibility due to this reduction such that it can easily be modified to support more complex boolean functions other than the function evaluating the 'Less Than' predicate (LT). In the paper we show one such boolean function, 'IsInInterval', which checks if an integer is in an interval (3I). We also show that our protocols can be easily extended to support shared outputs so that each party would hold a share of the result. Our generic solution can be applied to many e-commerce and data-mining applications requiring one or more such boolean functions to be computed securely. Our protocol not only is adaptable to different boolean functions but also is experimentally more efficient than the state-of-the-art integer comparison protocols supporting shared outputs.
Private integer comparison has been an essential computation function for many applications, including online auction, credential identification, data mining, and joint bidding. In the setting of two-party computation, two parties with private inputs (x and y) want to jointly compare them without revealing the value of those inputs to others (also known as the Millionaires’ problem) while the output should ensure correctness and preserve data privacy. The private inputs only can be revealed if they are equal, i.e., x = y. Many related works have been proposed to solve the integer comparison problem in various settings, focusing on different properties such as round and computation complexity. Most solutions decompose integers into bitwise representation and then securely evaluate the function in a Boolean circuit on encrypted bits. However, this type of solution is costly (especially for large integers) as each bit requires encryption and decryption. In this paper, we transform the private integer comparison into a block comparison problem. In particular, we employ a block vectorization mechanism to encode the private inputs into blocks. We show the security of our two-party protocol in the semi-honest model. Also, we implement the protocol to demonstrate its efficiency using block vectorization mechanism and homomorphic encryption. The experimental result proves that our proposed solution achieves high efficiency, particularly for large integer comparisons.
Secure two-party comparison plays a crucial role in many privacy-preserving applications, such as privacy-preserving data mining and machine learning. In particular, the available comparison protocols with the appropriate input/output configuration have a significant impact on the performance of these applications. In this paper, we firstly describe a taxonomy of secure two-party comparison protocols which allows us to describe the different configurations used for these protocols in a systematic manner. This taxonomy leads to a total of 216 types of comparison protocols. We then describe conversions among these types. While these conversions are based on known techniques and have explicitly or implicitly been considered previously, we show that a combination of these conversion techniques can be used to convert a perhaps less-known two-party comparison protocol by Nergiz et al. (IEEE SocialCom 2010) into a very efficient protocol in a configuration where the two parties hold shares of the values being compared, and obtain a share of the comparison result. This setting is often used in multi-party computation protocols, and hence in many privacy-preserving applications as well. We furthermore implement the protocol and measure its performance. Our measurement suggests that the protocol outperforms the previously proposed protocols for this input/output configuration, when off-line pre-computation is not permitted.
A secure integer comparison protocol is one of the most fundamental building blocks to construct protocols of rich functionality in multi-party computation. It allows parties to compute the less-than functionality on shared values in privacy preserving manner. In this paper, we present a tree-based secure two-party comparison protocol in the client-aided client-server model, which outperforms existing approaches in terms of round complexity when it is used for 64-bit data. Our proposed protocol requires only 9 communication rounds to compare 64-bit data, which is at least 3 times fewer rounds than existing protocols. This suggests that our protocol is adequate to be used in low-latency networks such as WAN.
Secure comparison is a fundamental problem in multiparty computation. There are two different parties, each holding an l-bit integer, denoted by a and b, respectively. The goal of secure comparison is to compute the order relationship between a and b, say (a>b)∈{0,1}, without revealing their inputs to any others. Since previous solutions based on homomorphic encryption need at least Ω(l) encryptions for each l-bit comparison, the total encryption time leads to a computational bottleneck for these protocols. This work presents a fast, semi-honest, secure comparison protocol based on the BFV encryption scheme. With its vector-like plaintext space, the number of required encryptions can be significantly reduced; actually, only six encryptions are needed for each comparison in our protocol. In other words, the proposed protocol can achieve the time complexity O˜(λ+l) for a given security parameter λ. As a result, 4096-bit integers can be securely compared within 12.08 ms, which is 280 times faster than the state-of-the-art homomorphic encryption-based secure comparison protocol. Furthermore, we can compare k pairs of l⋅k−1-bit integers with almost the same execution time as comparing l-bit integers and achieve higher throughput regardless of the compared integer size.