Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

Second-order phase transitions in a frustrated two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet

А. Ф. Барабанов, V. M. BEREZOVSKII

Published Oct 1, 1994• 15 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Influence of quantum phase transition and spin superconductivity in quantum two-dimensional frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnets

L.S. Lima

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2017•0 citations

Finite-Size Scaling for the Two-Dimensional Frustrated Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet

Heinz J. Schulz, Timothy A. L. Ziman

Using results for the 4 × 4 and 6 × 6 lattice, we produce the first finite-size scaling analysis of the frustrated Heisenberg model in two dimensions. The results indicate a continuous phase transition from the ordered phase into an intermediate phase without long-range magnetic order, as for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear sigma-model. The intermediate phase is stable for 0.4 < J2/J1 < 0.65 and exhibits either dimerization or broken chiral symmetry. The transition to the collinear phase at J2/J1 0.65 is apparently of first order.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Feb 21, 1992•211 citations

Quantum Phase Transitions of Quasi-One-Dimensional Heisenberg Antiferromagnets

Munehisa Matsumoto, Synge Todo, Chitoshi Yasuda +1 more

arXiv:cond-mat/0310619•Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 2004•1 citation

Quantum phase transitions in 2D antiferromagnets

Anders W. Sandvik, Marco Vekić

Journal of Low Temperature Physics•May 1, 1995•12 citations

Quantum phase transition in the three-dimensional anisotropic frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnetic model

J. Roberto Viana, J. Ricardo de Sousa, M. A. Contínentino

The phase diagram of the anisotropic quantum spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the presence of competitive nearest $({J}_{1})$- and next-nearest $({J}_{2}=\ensuremath{\alpha}{J}_{1})$-neighbor interactions on a simple cubic lattice is studied within the framework of the differential operator technique. The Hamiltonian is solved by using an effective-field theory in a two-spin cluster. We propose a function for the free energy, which is similar to the Landau expansion, in order to find the ground state $(T=0)$ and the finite-$T$ phase diagram. At zero temperature, we find a first-order quantum phase transition in the point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ between the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superantiferromagnetic (SAF) phases. This is dependent on the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ ($\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$ and 1 correspond to the isotropic Heisenberg and Ising models, respectively). The quantum critical values of ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\ne}1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are smaller than those of the classical model ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}=1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{c}=1/4$ (for example, for $\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(0)=0.21$). The former monotonically increases with the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$. The phase diagram in $T\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ plane presents a second-order transition at ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between the AF and paramagnetic (P) phases. The phase transition between the SAF and P phases is of first-order ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ for all values of $\ensuremath{\Delta}∊[0,1]$. The phase transition lines ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ and ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ merge in a critical end point (CEP) that is dependent on $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ [i.e., ${T}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are the temperature and frustration parameters at the CEP]. The ordered phases (AF and SAF) are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial re-entrant behavior at low temperatures.

Physical Review B•May 27, 2008•24 citations

Quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on low-dimensional frustrated lattices

Oleg Derzhko, Taras Krokhmalskii, Johannes Richter

arXiv:1103.5124•Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 2011•6 citations
Using results for the 4 × 4 and 6 × 6 lattice, we produce the first finite-size scaling analysis of the frustrated Heisenberg model in two dimensions. The results indicate a continuous phase transition from the ordered phase into an intermediate phase without long-range magnetic order, as for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear sigma-model. The intermediate phase is stable for 0.4 < J2/J1 < 0.65 and exhibits either dimerization or broken chiral symmetry. The transition to the collinear phase at J2/J1 0.65 is apparently of first order.
The phase diagram of the anisotropic quantum spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the presence of competitive nearest (J1)({J}_{1})(J1​)- and next-nearest $({J}_{2}=\ensuremath{\alpha}{J}_{1})$-neighbor interactions on a simple cubic lattice is studied within the framework of the differential operator technique. The Hamiltonian is solved by using an effective-field theory in a two-spin cluster. We propose a function for the free energy, which is similar to the Landau expansion, in order to find the ground state (T=0)(T=0)(T=0) and the finite-TTT phase diagram. At zero temperature, we find a first-order quantum phase transition in the point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ between the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superantiferromagnetic (SAF) phases. This is dependent on the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ ($\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$ and 1 correspond to the isotropic Heisenberg and Ising models, respectively). The quantum critical values of ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\ne}1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are smaller than those of the classical model ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}=1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{c}=1/4$ (for example, for $\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(0)=0.21$). The former monotonically increases with the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$. The phase diagram in $T\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ plane presents a second-order transition at ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between the AF and paramagnetic (P) phases. The phase transition between the SAF and P phases is of first-order ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ for all values of $\ensuremath{\Delta}∊[0,1]$. The phase transition lines ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ and ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ merge in a critical end point (CEP) that is dependent on $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ [i.e., ${T}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are the temperature and frustration parameters at the CEP]. The ordered phases (AF and SAF) are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial re-entrant behavior at low temperatures.