Quantum Electronics

Is a nondemolition measurement of the quantum state vector collapse of a remote localised system possible?

Aleksandr V. Belinsky

Published May 1, 2020• 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract By the example of an experiment that implements, according to its authors, Wigner friends’ paradox, the impossibility of measuring the state vector collapse of a remote localised system is shown. It is also found that the objectivity of the results of quantum measurements is not violated in this case.

DOI: 10.1070/qel17191

Related papers

Wigner’s friend paradox: does objective reality not exist?

Aleksandr V. Belinsky

Abstract It is shown that the lack of objective existence of the results of quantum measurements of the state of collapse of the state vector of a remote localized system cannot be proved by an experiment using the reality of violation of Bell’s inequality in the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt form. Arguments of a general nature and a specific calculation example confirming this conclusion are also given.

Physics-UspekhiMay 16, 202012 citations

Wigner's Friend Paradox Revisited

Peter Reichert, Markus Enz

By assuming (i) a universal, observer-independent quantum state, by considering (ii) measurement processes with wave function collapse as part of quantum mechanical time evolution (also within isolated systems), and by (iii) clearly distinguishing the state of a quantum system from the knowledge of conscious observers about this state, we suggest a modified Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics that resolves Wigner's Friend and extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes. The suggested interpretation leads to differences in some outcome probabilities compared to previous analyses which, in principle, make it possible to falsify the suggested modifications or the previous analyses (or both). The fundamental problem of the incompleteness of quantum mechanics in the Copenhagen interpretation regarding the lack of a precise definition and a mechanistic description of the measurement process (including the collapse of the wave function) is not addressed in this study. However, the argumentation regarding the resolution of Wigner's Friend paradoxes also applies to attempts for such a mechanistic description using collapse models with stochastic extensions to the Schrödinger equation or trying to model wave function collapse with unitary time evolution and irreversibility of the measurement process resulting from quantum statistical mechanics.

quant-pharXiv:2608.02635Aug 3, 20260 citations

Classical Information and Collapse in Wigner’s Friend Setups

Veronika Baumann

The famous Wigner's friend experiment considers an observer-the friend-and a superobserver-Wigner-who treats the friend as a quantum system and her interaction with other quantum systems as unitary dynamics. This is at odds with the friend describing this interaction via collapse dynamics, if she interacts with the quantum system in a way that she would consider a measurement. These different descriptions constitute the Wigner's friend paradox. Extended Wigner's friend experiments combine the original thought experiment with non-locality setups. This allows for deriving local friendliness inequalities, similar to Bell's theorem, which can be violated for certain extended Wigner's friend scenarios. A Wigner's friend paradox and the violation of local friendliness inequalities require that no classical record exists, which reveals the result the friend observed during her measurement. Otherwise, Wigner agrees with his friend's description and no local friendliness inequality can be violated. In this article, I introduce classical communication between Wigner and his friend and discuss its effects on the simple as well as extended Wigner's friend experiments. By controlling the properties of a (quasi) classical communication channel between Wigner and the friend, one can regulate how much outcome information about the friend's measurement is revealed. This gives a smooth transition between the paradoxical description and the possibility of violating local friendliness inequalities, on the one hand, and the effectively collapsed case, on the other hand.

arXiv:2308.08260EntropyOct 6, 20235 citations

No relation for Wigner's friend

Leonardo Castellani

We argue that Wigner's friend thought experiment does not support observer dependence of quantum states. An analysis in terms of history vectors suggests that quantum collapse is to be understood as collapse of histories rather than collapse of states.

Nov 16, 20206 citations

Objective Reality and the Paradox of Wigner Friends

Aleksandr V. Belinsky

Abstract Using the experiment described at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05080.pdf as an example, it has been shown that the absence of the objective existence of the results of quantum measurements cannot be rigorously proved based on the registration of the violation of the Bell inequality in the form of Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt. Universal arguments are also presented to generalize this inference.

Optics and SpectroscopySep 1, 20202 citations

Wigner's Friend Paradox: Quantum Measurement, Observation, and the Problem of Objectivity

Mirza Adnan Mohtashim

This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of Wigner’s Friend paradox (1961), a foundational thought experiment in quantum mechanics that highlights the tension between the internal perspective of a measuring observer (who experiences a definite outcome) and the external perspective of a super-observer who treats the entire laboratory as a quantum system in superposition. It traces the historical lineage from Schrödinger’s cat and von Neumann’s measurement theory, provides a formal mathematical description of the state evolution and logical structure of the paradox, examines implications for major interpretations of quantum mechanics (Copenhagen, Everettian many-worlds, QBism, relational quantum mechanics, and objective collapse theories), and discusses modern extensions such as the Frauchiger–Renner paradox. The work explores profound philosophical and epistemological consequences for the nature of observation, objectivity, intersubjectivity, and the role of consciousness in quantum theory (2026).

May 29, 20260 citations