Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences

Some Perspectives on the Intersection of Modern Indian Painting and Quantum Mechanics: A Common Source of Research on Physical Reality

Paulo Nuno Martins

Published Jan 25, 2020• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.36347/sjahss.2020.v08i01.004

Related papers

Interdisciplinary Approach to Combine Science and Art: Understanding of the Paintings of René Magritte from the Viewpoint of Quantum Mechanics

Hunkoog Jho

Foundations of Science•Mar 16, 2019•3 citations

Exploring Quantum Mechanics through Advaita Vedānta and Śūnyavāda: A Clarification on the Interaction between Two Seemingly Unrelated Fields – Physical Science and Philosophy

Tripathi RL

This paper aims to reveal the point of contact between modern science and ancient Indian philosophy, namely quantum mechanics and Advaita Vedanta and Sunyavada in particular. Modern quantum research discloses the essential characteristics of quantum mechanics that disprove classical determinism and find out the relations between energy, entropy, and observations, wave-particle duality, and entanglement. These ideas have some similarity with Advaita Vedanta’s non-dualism (Maya) and Buddhism’s relational existence (Sunyavada) yet there lacks investigation of how either paradigms interface to develop their conceptual epistemology and ontological nexus. This paper recognises the issue of the bridging of these two perspectives, suggests Energetic Relational Ontology as a solution, and presents a new concept, Quantum-Metaphysical Cohesion, through which energy, consciousness and reality can be seen as one.

Physical Science & Biophysics Journal•Jul 12, 2024•0 citations

অদবতদরশনর আলয় কয়নটম ফজকসর রহসয অনসনধন

Dr. Krishna Dhibar

The intersection of Advaita Vedanta, a profound non-dualistic school of Indian philosophy, and Quantum Physics, a cornerstone of modern science, opens an intriguing dialogue about the nature of reality.Advaita posits that Brahman the ultimate, indivisible reality-is the substratum of all existence, while the world of multiplicity is merely an illusion (Maya).Quantum Physics, through principles such as wave-particle duality, uncertainty, and entanglement, similarly challenges classical notions of determinism and objective reality.Both frameworks converge on a key insight: the perceived plurality of the universe masks an underlying unity.This paper explores the conceptual parallels between Advaita and Quantum Mechanics, particularly in three areas: (1) Reality and Illusion-Advaita's Maya and Quantum indeterminacy; (2) Observer and Observation-the role of consciousness in shaping experience versus the observer effect in quantum measurements; and (3) Unity in Diversity-Brahman as the one without a second and quantum non-locality as evidence of fundamental interconnectedness.Classical Upanishadic aphorisms such as "Sarvam Khalvidam Brahma" ("All this is Brahman) and modern physicists' reflections, notably by Schrödinger and Heisenberg, provide a philosophical and scientific basis for this comparative inquiry.Far from being an attempt to conflate spirituality with science, this study proposes a dialogical approach, emphasizing how Advaita and Quantum Physics, despite their distinct epistemologies, complement each other in illuminating the ultimate question: What is reality?The synthesis of these perspectives may offer a broader, integrative understanding of consciousness, matter, and the universe an understanding that transcends disciplinary boundaries and points toward a unified vision of existence.

PRATIDHWANI the ECHO•Oct 31, 2025•1 citation

Quantum Mechanics and Some Hindu Perspectives

V. V. Raman

Routledge eBooks•Feb 17, 2015•2 citations

QUANTUM ASPECTS OF PERCEIVED REALITY: A NEW ENGAGEMENT OF SCIENCE AND ART

Robert de Beaugrande

Journal of Literary Semantics•Jan 1, 1989•2 citations

Metaphysical unity of transcendental psychology and quantum mechanics. Part 1

Нагдян Рубен Михайлович

Since the beginning of the XXI st century, there has been a process of intense convergence and interpenetration of two seemingly opposing sciences – quantum mechanics and psychology. In accordance with it, the question arises about a common methodological foundation for these sciences. The article shows that the “first philosophy” of Aristotle can serve as a general philosophical methodology for these sciences. In the context of the metaphysical triad necessarypossible-real, the “intersection points” of A. I. Mirakyan’s transcendental psychology and A. Yu. Sevalnikov’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. The article examines the features of the formation of a new direction in modern psychology, which studies the problem of mental phenomena generation. At the same time, a comparison is made with the transcendentalism of Descartes, in which its limitations and incompleteness are revealed. It is shown that both in transcendental psychology and in quantum mechanics (W. Heisenberg) epistemological problems arise associated with the impossibility of using the language of their classical predecessors. In both sciences, it becomes necessary to apply a new language, a new way of thinking and a new logic of understanding the phenomena under study. All this allows us to conclude that both in transcendental psychology and in quantum mechanics, researchers are dealing with a new ontology of reality that differs from the reality studied in classical physics and in the phenomenology of classical psychology. The article substantiates that the main methodological reason limiting the possibilities of carrying out theoretical studies of deeper layers of reality is the use of the product (physical) approach. The product approach is based on the language used to describe the observed reality. It became necessary to divide reality into observable and unobservable. In the language of metaphysics of modalities, this is translated as «being in possibility» and «being in reality.» One of the “intersection points” of quantum mechanics and transcendental psychology is the category ofpossibility, in which the essence of reality is expressed, which both disciplines compared in this article seek to describe and explain

Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation
This paper aims to reveal the point of contact between modern science and ancient Indian philosophy, namely quantum mechanics and Advaita Vedanta and Sunyavada in particular. Modern quantum research discloses the essential characteristics of quantum mechanics that disprove classical determinism and find out the relations between energy, entropy, and observations, wave-particle duality, and entanglement. These ideas have some similarity with Advaita Vedanta’s non-dualism (Maya) and Buddhism’s relational existence (Sunyavada) yet there lacks investigation of how either paradigms interface to develop their conceptual epistemology and ontological nexus. This paper recognises the issue of the bridging of these two perspectives, suggests Energetic Relational Ontology as a solution, and presents a new concept, Quantum-Metaphysical Cohesion, through which energy, consciousness and reality can be seen as one.
The intersection of Advaita Vedanta, a profound non-dualistic school of Indian philosophy, and Quantum Physics, a cornerstone of modern science, opens an intriguing dialogue about the nature of reality.Advaita posits that Brahman the ultimate, indivisible reality-is the substratum of all existence, while the world of multiplicity is merely an illusion (Maya).Quantum Physics, through principles such as wave-particle duality, uncertainty, and entanglement, similarly challenges classical notions of determinism and objective reality.Both frameworks converge on a key insight: the perceived plurality of the universe masks an underlying unity.This paper explores the conceptual parallels between Advaita and Quantum Mechanics, particularly in three areas: (1) Reality and Illusion-Advaita's Maya and Quantum indeterminacy; (2) Observer and Observation-the role of consciousness in shaping experience versus the observer effect in quantum measurements; and (3) Unity in Diversity-Brahman as the one without a second and quantum non-locality as evidence of fundamental interconnectedness.Classical Upanishadic aphorisms such as "Sarvam Khalvidam Brahma" ("All this is Brahman) and modern physicists' reflections, notably by Schrödinger and Heisenberg, provide a philosophical and scientific basis for this comparative inquiry.Far from being an attempt to conflate spirituality with science, this study proposes a dialogical approach, emphasizing how Advaita and Quantum Physics, despite their distinct epistemologies, complement each other in illuminating the ultimate question: What is reality?The synthesis of these perspectives may offer a broader, integrative understanding of consciousness, matter, and the universe an understanding that transcends disciplinary boundaries and points toward a unified vision of existence.
Since the beginning of the XXI st century, there has been a process of intense convergence and interpenetration of two seemingly opposing sciences – quantum mechanics and psychology. In accordance with it, the question arises about a common methodological foundation for these sciences. The article shows that the “first philosophy” of Aristotle can serve as a general philosophical methodology for these sciences. In the context of the metaphysical triad necessarypossible-real, the “intersection points” of A. I. Mirakyan’s transcendental psychology and A. Yu. Sevalnikov’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. The article examines the features of the formation of a new direction in modern psychology, which studies the problem of mental phenomena generation. At the same time, a comparison is made with the transcendentalism of Descartes, in which its limitations and incompleteness are revealed. It is shown that both in transcendental psychology and in quantum mechanics (W. Heisenberg) epistemological problems arise associated with the impossibility of using the language of their classical predecessors. In both sciences, it becomes necessary to apply a new language, a new way of thinking and a new logic of understanding the phenomena under study. All this allows us to conclude that both in transcendental psychology and in quantum mechanics, researchers are dealing with a new ontology of reality that differs from the reality studied in classical physics and in the phenomenology of classical psychology. The article substantiates that the main methodological reason limiting the possibilities of carrying out theoretical studies of deeper layers of reality is the use of the product (physical) approach. The product approach is based on the language used to describe the observed reality. It became necessary to divide reality into observable and unobservable. In the language of metaphysics of modalities, this is translated as «being in possibility» and «being in reality.» One of the “intersection points” of quantum mechanics and transcendental psychology is the category ofpossibility, in which the essence of reality is expressed, which both disciplines compared in this article seek to describe and explain