Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

APS

Can we trust the random phase approximation? I: Correlation energy

Calvin M. Johnson, Ionel Stetcu

Published Oct 1, 2003• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Self-consistent calculations of correlation energies within the random phase approximation

Stefano de Gironcoli, Ngoc Linh Nguyen, Viet Huy Nguyen +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 21, 2011•0 citations

Accelerating the Computation of Density Functional Theory's Correlation Energy under Random Phase Approximations

Kyle Thicke

•Jan 1, 2019•1 citation

Efficient calculation of random-phase approximation correlation energies using Lanczos chains and an optimal basis set

Dario Rocca

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2014•0 citations

Exchange-Correlation and Electronic Excitation Energies from Pairing Matrix Fluctuations and the Particle-Particle Random Phase Approximation

Weitao Yang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2015•0 citations

Random phase approximation vs exact shell-model correlation energies

Ionel Stetcu, Calvin W. Johnson

The random phase approximation (RPA) builds in correlations left out by mean-field theory. In full $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces we calculate the Hartree-Fock $(\mathrm{HF})+\mathrm{RPA}$ binding energy, and compare it to exact diagonalization. We find that often, but not always, the $\mathrm{HF}+\mathrm{RPA}$ gives a good approximation to the ``exact'' ground state energy. In those cases where the RPA is less satisfactory, however, there is no obvious correlation with properties of the HF state, such as deformation or overlap with the exact ground state wave function. This weakens the reliability of the RPA for computing binding energies.

arXiv:nucl-th/0205029•Physical Review C•Sep 3, 2002•37 citations

On the equivalence of ring-coupled cluster and adiabatic connection fluctuation-dissipation theorem random phase approximation correlation energy expressions

Georg Jansen, Ru-Fen Liu, János G. Ángyán

The correlation energy in the direct random phase approximation (dRPA) can be written, among other possibilities, either in terms of the interaction strength averaged correlation density matrix, or in terms of the coupled cluster doubles amplitudes obtained in the direct ring approximation (drCCD). Although the corresponding dRPA correlation density matrix on the one hand, and the drCCD amplitude matrix on the other hand, differ significantly, they yield identical energies. Similarly, the analogous RPA and rCCD correlation energies calculated from antisymmetrized two-electron integrals are identical to each other despite very different underlying working equations. In the present communication, a direct correspondence between amplitudes and densities is established and investigated with perturbation theory arguments. Our analysis also sheds some light on the properties of recently proposed RPA/rCCD variants which use antisymmetrized integrals in part of the equations and nonantisymmetrized integrals in others.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 18, 2010•89 citations
The random phase approximation (RPA) builds in correlations left out by mean-field theory. In full $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces we calculate the Hartree-Fock (HF)+RPA(\mathrm{HF})+\mathrm{RPA}(HF)+RPA binding energy, and compare it to exact diagonalization. We find that often, but not always, the HF+RPA\mathrm{HF}+\mathrm{RPA}HF+RPA gives a good approximation to the ``exact'' ground state energy. In those cases where the RPA is less satisfactory, however, there is no obvious correlation with properties of the HF state, such as deformation or overlap with the exact ground state wave function. This weakens the reliability of the RPA for computing binding energies.
The correlation energy in the direct random phase approximation (dRPA) can be written, among other possibilities, either in terms of the interaction strength averaged correlation density matrix, or in terms of the coupled cluster doubles amplitudes obtained in the direct ring approximation (drCCD). Although the corresponding dRPA correlation density matrix on the one hand, and the drCCD amplitude matrix on the other hand, differ significantly, they yield identical energies. Similarly, the analogous RPA and rCCD correlation energies calculated from antisymmetrized two-electron integrals are identical to each other despite very different underlying working equations. In the present communication, a direct correspondence between amplitudes and densities is established and investigated with perturbation theory arguments. Our analysis also sheds some light on the properties of recently proposed RPA/rCCD variants which use antisymmetrized integrals in part of the equations and nonantisymmetrized integrals in others.