We calculate the interacting bandgap energy of a solid within the random-phase approximation (RPA) to density functional theory (DFT). The interacting bandgap energy is defined as ${E}_{g}={E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N+1)+{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N\ensuremath{-}1)\ensuremath{-}2{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N)$, where
ERPA(N) is the total DFT-RPA energy of the
N-electron system. We compare the interacting bandgap energy with the Kohn-Sham bandgap energy, which is the difference between the conduction and valence band edges in the Kohn-Sham band structure. We show that they differ by an unrenormalized ``
G0W0'' self-energy correction (i.e., a
GW self-energy correction computed using Kohn-Sham orbitals and energies as input). This provides a well-defined and meaningful interpretation to
G0W0 quasiparticle bandgap calculations, but questions the physics behind the renormalization factors in the expression of the bandgap energy. We also separate the kinetic from the Coulomb contributions to the DFT-RPA bandgap energy, and discuss the related problem of the derivative discontinuity in the DFT-RPA functional. Last we discuss the applicability of our results to other functionals based on many-body perturbation theory.
The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].
For the paradigmatic case of H(2) dissociation, we compare state-of-the-art many-body perturbation theory in the GW approximation and density-functional theory in the exact-exchange plus random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation energy. For an unbiased comparison and to prevent spurious starting point effects, both approaches are iterated to full self-consistency (i.e., sc-RPA and sc-GW). The exchange-correlation diagrams in both approaches are topologically identical, but in sc-RPA they are evaluated with noninteracting and in sc-GW with interacting Green functions. This has a profound consequence for the dissociation region, where sc-RPA is superior to sc-GW. We argue that for a given diagrammatic expansion, sc-RPA outperforms sc-GW when it comes to bond breaking. We attribute this to the difference in the correlation energy rather than the treatment of the kinetic energy.