Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Many World Quantum Interpretations of Scattered State and Resonance to Black Hole Information Paradox

Aayush Verma

Published Mar 1, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Black Hole Information Paradox and the Collapse of the Wave Function

Elias Okon, Daniel Sudarsky

arXiv:1406.2011•Foundations of Physics•Feb 25, 2015•26 citations

Beyond Small Corrections: The Universal State Bound and the Dynamic Nature of the Black Hole Information Paradox

Minseong Kim

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

The black hole information problem beyond quantum theory

Markus P. Müller, Jonathan Oppenheim, Oscar Dahlsten

arXiv:1206.5030•Journal of High Energy Physics•Sep 1, 2012•5 citations

Decoherence and recoherence in an analogue of the black hole information paradox

J. R. Anglin, Raymond Laflamme, Wojciech Hubert Zurek +1 more

We analyze a system consisting of an oscillator coupled to a field. With the field traced out as an environment, the oscillator loses coherence on a very short decoherence time scale; but, on a much longer relaxation time scale, it evolves predictably into a unique, pure (ground) state. This example of recoherence has interesting implications both for the interpretation of quantum theory and for the loss of information during black hole evaporation---the so-called black hole information paradox. We examine these implications by investigating the intermediate and final states of the quantum field, treated as an open system coupled to an unobserved oscillator.

arXiv:gr-qc/9411073•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Aug 15, 1995•54 citations

The 101 Phase State and the Black Hole Information Paradox

Melissa Blanchard, S. Sage

The black hole information paradox remains one of modern physics’ most persistent conceptual fractures. Hawking’s original formulation suggested that black hole evaporation yields thermal radiation, apparently severing the relation between the initial state and the final emitted state. Quantum theory, however, requires unitary evolution and therefore forbids true information destruction. This paper proposes that the paradox may be more fruitfully interpreted not as a flat binary contradiction between preservation and loss, but as an unresolved boundary-state problem. To clarify that claim, the paper introduces the 101 Phase State as a symbolic formalism for intermediate informational resolution. In this model, +1 denotes preserved or recoverable informational order, -1 denotes apparent loss or thermal unreadability, and 0 denotes the boundary interface at which observational contradiction becomes structurally legible but not yet fully resolved.

•Aug 9, 2026•0 citations

The black hole information problem beyond quantum theory

Markus P. Müller, Jonathan Oppenheim, Oscar Dahlsten

Journal of High Energy Physics•Sep 1, 2012•26 citations
We analyze a system consisting of an oscillator coupled to a field. With the field traced out as an environment, the oscillator loses coherence on a very short decoherence time scale; but, on a much longer relaxation time scale, it evolves predictably into a unique, pure (ground) state. This example of recoherence has interesting implications both for the interpretation of quantum theory and for the loss of information during black hole evaporation---the so-called black hole information paradox. We examine these implications by investigating the intermediate and final states of the quantum field, treated as an open system coupled to an unobserved oscillator.
The black hole information paradox remains one of modern physics’ most persistent conceptual fractures. Hawking’s original formulation suggested that black hole evaporation yields thermal radiation, apparently severing the relation between the initial state and the final emitted state. Quantum theory, however, requires unitary evolution and therefore forbids true information destruction. This paper proposes that the paradox may be more fruitfully interpreted not as a flat binary contradiction between preservation and loss, but as an unresolved boundary-state problem. To clarify that claim, the paper introduces the 101 Phase State as a symbolic formalism for intermediate informational resolution. In this model, +1 denotes preserved or recoverable informational order, -1 denotes apparent loss or thermal unreadability, and 0 denotes the boundary interface at which observational contradiction becomes structurally legible but not yet fully resolved.