Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

NbN-based superconducting qubit on Si substrate

Sunmi Kim, Tomoko Fuse, Fumiki Yoshihara, Wei Qiu, Taro Yamashita, Ziqiao Ao, Kouichi Semba, Hirotaka Terai

Published Mar 6, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Developmen of multiplex NbN superconducting resonator on Si-substrate

Wei Qiu

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Jul 17, 2015•0 citations

Fabrication of ultra-small NbN tunnel junctions on Si-substrate

Wei Qiu, Hirotaka Terai

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Jul 10, 2019•0 citations

Capacitively shunted flux qubit based on epitaxially grown NbN/AlN/NbN Josephson junctions on Si substrate

Sunmi Kim, Hirotaka Terai, Taro Yamashita +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2021•0 citations

Dielectric Loss in Superconducting NbN (200) CPW Resonator Developed on Si Substrate

Wei Qiu, Kazumasa Makise, Hirotaka Terai

In current superconducting qubit circuit development, coherence time is limited by low-frequency flux noise introduced from localized two-level systems (TLSs) in the fabricated superconducting circuit, including superconducting materials, the interface between thin films, and the substrate. As a part of the effect to tackle this issue from a substrate standpoint, we succeed in fabricating NbN (200) oriented coplanar waveguide resonator (CPWR) on a thin titanium nitride (TiN) (200) buffered Si (100) substrate. The internal loss is close to 3 × 10-5nearphoton> ~1, improved from ~2 × 10-4in NbN (200) CPWR fabricated on MgO (100). For NbN (200) resonators grown on Si (100), the internal loss shows microwave energy independent. To further clarity if this energy independence is due to the change of substrate material, we also fabricated TiN (200) CPWR on Si (100). In contrast to NbN (200) CPWR, the loss of TiN (200) resonator shows a strong microwave dependent, an indication of TLSs originated from the interface and the surface. We suggest TLSs in NbN (200) CPWR are dominated from different mechanism other than arising from the interface and surface.

IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity•Jan 9, 2017•5 citations

Fabrication process of NbN integrated circuit for superconducting qubit

Hirotaka Terai

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Feb 13, 2013•0 citations

Development of NbN-based superconducting qubit with π-phase shifter

Sunmi Kim, Taro Yamashita, Haruki Kato +6 more

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Nov 18, 2020•0 citations
In current superconducting qubit circuit development, coherence time is limited by low-frequency flux noise introduced from localized two-level systems (TLSs) in the fabricated superconducting circuit, including superconducting materials, the interface between thin films, and the substrate. As a part of the effect to tackle this issue from a substrate standpoint, we succeed in fabricating NbN (200) oriented coplanar waveguide resonator (CPWR) on a thin titanium nitride (TiN) (200) buffered Si (100) substrate. The internal loss is close to 3 × 10-5nearphoton> ~1, improved from ~2 × 10-4in NbN (200) CPWR fabricated on MgO (100). For NbN (200) resonators grown on Si (100), the internal loss shows microwave energy independent. To further clarity if this energy independence is due to the change of substrate material, we also fabricated TiN (200) CPWR on Si (100). In contrast to NbN (200) CPWR, the loss of TiN (200) resonator shows a strong microwave dependent, an indication of TLSs originated from the interface and the surface. We suggest TLSs in NbN (200) CPWR are dominated from different mechanism other than arising from the interface and surface.