Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Entropy

In Praise of Quantum Uncertainty

Eliahu Cohen, Avishy Y. Carmi

Published Mar 6, 2020• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum uncertainty has a tremendous explanatory power. Coherent superposition, quantum equations of motion, entanglement, nonlocal correlations, dynamical nonlocality, contextuality, discord, counterfactual protocols, weak measurements, quantization itself, and even preservation of causality can be traced back to quantum uncertainty. We revisit and extend our previous works, as well as some other works of the community, in order to account for the above claims. Special emphasis is given to the connection between uncertainty and nonlocality, two notions which evolved quite independently and may seem distinct but, in fact, are tightly related. Indeterminism, or more precisely, locally consistent indeterminism, should be understood as the enabler of most quantum phenomena (and possibly all of them).

DOI
10.3390/e22030302

Related papers

Trade-off relations between Bell nonlocality and local Kochen–Specker contextuality in generalized Bell scenarios

Lucas Emanuel Antunes Porto, Gabriel Ruffolo, Rafael Rabelo +2 more

Abstract The relations between Bell nonlocality and Kochen–Specker contextuality have been subject of research from many different perspectives in the last decades. Recently, some interesting results on these relations have been explored in the so-called generalized Bell scenarios, that is, scenarios where Bell spatial separation (or agency independence) coexist with (at least one of the) parties’ ability to perform compatible measurements at each round of the experiment. When this party has an n-cycle compatiblity setup, it was first claimed that Bell nonlocality could not be concomitantly observed with contextuality at this party’s local experiment. However, by a more natural reading of the definition of locality, it turns out that both Bell nonlocality and local contextuality can, in fact, be jointly present. In spite of it, in this work we prove that in the simplest of those scenarios there cannot be arbitrary amounts of both of these two resources together. That is, in these cases we show that the violation of any Bell inequality limits the possible violations of any local noncontextuality inequality. We also explore this trade-off relation using quantifiers of nonlocality and contextuality, discussing how such a relation can be understood in terms of a ‘global’ notion of contextuality, and we study possible extensions of this result to other scenarios.

arXiv:2405.02964•New Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 2024•1 citation

The Uncertainty Relations in Quantum Mechanics

Devdip Sen

The notion of uncertainty in the description of a physical system has assumed prodigious importance in the development of quantum theory. Overcoming the early misunderstanding and confusion, the concept grew continuously and still remains an active and fertile research field. Curious new insights and correlations are gained and developed in the process with the introduction of new 'measures' of uncertainty or indeterminacy and the development of quantum measurement theory. In this article we intend to reach a fairly uptodate status report of this yet unfurling concept and its interrelation with some distinctive quantum features like nonlocality, steering and entanglement/ inseparability. Some recent controversies are discussed and the grey areas are mentioned.

•Jun 25, 2014•112 citations

Quantum coherence versus quantum uncertainty

Shunlong Luo, Yuan Sun

The notion of measurement is of both foundational and instrumental significance in quantum mechanics, and coherence destroyed by measurements (decoherence) lies at the very heart of quantum to classical transition. Qualitative aspects of this spirit have been widely recognized and analyzed ever since the inception of quantum theory. However, axiomatic and quantitative investigations of coherence are attracting great interest only recently with several figures of merit for coherence introduced [Baumgratz, Cramer, and Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)]. While these resource theoretic approaches have many appealing and intuitive features, they rely crucially on various notions of incoherent operations which are sophisticated, subtle, and not uniquely defined, as have been critically assessed [Chitambar and Gour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030401 (2016)]. In this paper, we elaborate on the idea that coherence and quantum uncertainty are dual viewpoints of the same quantum substrate, and address coherence quantification by identifying coherence of a state (with respect to a measurement) with quantum uncertainty of a measurement (with respect to a state). Consequently, coherence measures may be set into correspondence with measures of quantum uncertainty. In particular, we take average quantum Fisher information as a measure of quantum uncertainty, and introduce the corresponding measure of coherence, which is demonstrated to exhibit desirable properties. Implications for interpreting quantum purity as maximal coherence, and quantum discord as minimal coherence, are illustrated.

Physical Review A•Aug 25, 2017•140 citations

Quantum entanglement as a foundational and informational resource: A unified perspective for separability, nonlocal games, contextuality, decoherence, and measurement

Sachin .

Quantum entanglement is the defining feature of composite quantum systems, underpinning correlations beyond classical randomness and enabling quantum communication, cryptography, and error correction. Surveys treat entanglement, Bell nonlocality, contextuality, and decoherence in isolation or narrow subcommunities. This review advances a unified perspective analysing these phenomena as distinct but interrelated manifestations of nonclassical correlations with an operational structure. We organise bipartite entanglement through separability criteria, Schmidt decomposition, and partial-transpose techniques, and develop tools for nonlocal correlations based on Bell inequalities, Tsirelson’s bound, nonlocal games, and self-testing, emphasising device-independent protocols. We then examine contextuality and magic states as resources for quantum computational advantage beyond entanglement, clarifying their relationship to nonlocality. Finally, we characterise decoherence as environment-induced entanglement selecting classical records, and use this perspective to specify which aspects of the measurement problem it addresses and which require interpretational or dynamical extensions. Integrating these dimensions, the review clarifies how notions of nonclassicality relate, diverge, and underpin quantum technologies.

International Journal of Physics and Mathematics•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum correlations, measurement and the origin of uncertainty

Daniele Tommasini

I argue that the correlations that are predicted by Quantum Field Theory should not be interpreted as a real sign of non locality.

arXiv:hep-th/0111197•Nov 22, 2001•0 citations

HARMONIC PHYSICS: Why Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Violate Relativity

Lisa Doumbouya

Quantum mechanics exhibits nonlocal correlations, most clearly demonstrated by entanglement and the violation of Bell inequalities. These phenomena are often described as implying “faster-than-light influences,” creating an apparent contradiction with special relativity. This paper shows that no such contradiction exists once a clear distinction is made between propagating causal influence and global constraint resolution. In a harmonic, structure-first framework, entangled systems constitute single coherent structures extended across space. Measurement imposes a local boundary condition that globally refines the allowed state of the system without transmitting energy, signals, or information. Relativistic causality remains intact because no controllable superluminal communication is possible. Quantum nonlocality reflects structural nonseparability, not superluminal dynamics.

•Dec 20, 2025•0 citations
Quantum uncertainty has a tremendous explanatory power. Coherent superposition, quantum equations of motion, entanglement, nonlocal correlations, dynamical nonlocality, contextuality, discord, counterfactual protocols, weak measurements, quantization itself, and even preservation of causality can be traced back to quantum uncertainty. We revisit and extend our previous works, as well as some other works of the community, in order to account for the above claims. Special emphasis is given to the connection between uncertainty and nonlocality, two notions which evolved quite independently and may seem distinct but, in fact, are tightly related. Indeterminism, or more precisely, locally consistent indeterminism, should be understood as the enabler of most quantum phenomena (and possibly all of them).
Abstract The relations between Bell nonlocality and Kochen–Specker contextuality have been subject of research from many different perspectives in the last decades. Recently, some interesting results on these relations have been explored in the so-called generalized Bell scenarios, that is, scenarios where Bell spatial separation (or agency independence) coexist with (at least one of the) parties’ ability to perform compatible measurements at each round of the experiment. When this party has an n-cycle compatiblity setup, it was first claimed that Bell nonlocality could not be concomitantly observed with contextuality at this party’s local experiment. However, by a more natural reading of the definition of locality, it turns out that both Bell nonlocality and local contextuality can, in fact, be jointly present. In spite of it, in this work we prove that in the simplest of those scenarios there cannot be arbitrary amounts of both of these two resources together. That is, in these cases we show that the violation of any Bell inequality limits the possible violations of any local noncontextuality inequality. We also explore this trade-off relation using quantifiers of nonlocality and contextuality, discussing how such a relation can be understood in terms of a ‘global’ notion of contextuality, and we study possible extensions of this result to other scenarios.
The notion of uncertainty in the description of a physical system has assumed prodigious importance in the development of quantum theory. Overcoming the early misunderstanding and confusion, the concept grew continuously and still remains an active and fertile research field. Curious new insights and correlations are gained and developed in the process with the introduction of new 'measures' of uncertainty or indeterminacy and the development of quantum measurement theory. In this article we intend to reach a fairly uptodate status report of this yet unfurling concept and its interrelation with some distinctive quantum features like nonlocality, steering and entanglement/ inseparability. Some recent controversies are discussed and the grey areas are mentioned.
The notion of measurement is of both foundational and instrumental significance in quantum mechanics, and coherence destroyed by measurements (decoherence) lies at the very heart of quantum to classical transition. Qualitative aspects of this spirit have been widely recognized and analyzed ever since the inception of quantum theory. However, axiomatic and quantitative investigations of coherence are attracting great interest only recently with several figures of merit for coherence introduced [Baumgratz, Cramer, and Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)]. While these resource theoretic approaches have many appealing and intuitive features, they rely crucially on various notions of incoherent operations which are sophisticated, subtle, and not uniquely defined, as have been critically assessed [Chitambar and Gour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030401 (2016)]. In this paper, we elaborate on the idea that coherence and quantum uncertainty are dual viewpoints of the same quantum substrate, and address coherence quantification by identifying coherence of a state (with respect to a measurement) with quantum uncertainty of a measurement (with respect to a state). Consequently, coherence measures may be set into correspondence with measures of quantum uncertainty. In particular, we take average quantum Fisher information as a measure of quantum uncertainty, and introduce the corresponding measure of coherence, which is demonstrated to exhibit desirable properties. Implications for interpreting quantum purity as maximal coherence, and quantum discord as minimal coherence, are illustrated.
Quantum entanglement is the defining feature of composite quantum systems, underpinning correlations beyond classical randomness and enabling quantum communication, cryptography, and error correction. Surveys treat entanglement, Bell nonlocality, contextuality, and decoherence in isolation or narrow subcommunities. This review advances a unified perspective analysing these phenomena as distinct but interrelated manifestations of nonclassical correlations with an operational structure. We organise bipartite entanglement through separability criteria, Schmidt decomposition, and partial-transpose techniques, and develop tools for nonlocal correlations based on Bell inequalities, Tsirelson’s bound, nonlocal games, and self-testing, emphasising device-independent protocols. We then examine contextuality and magic states as resources for quantum computational advantage beyond entanglement, clarifying their relationship to nonlocality. Finally, we characterise decoherence as environment-induced entanglement selecting classical records, and use this perspective to specify which aspects of the measurement problem it addresses and which require interpretational or dynamical extensions. Integrating these dimensions, the review clarifies how notions of nonclassicality relate, diverge, and underpin quantum technologies.
Quantum mechanics exhibits nonlocal correlations, most clearly demonstrated by entanglement and the violation of Bell inequalities. These phenomena are often described as implying “faster-than-light influences,” creating an apparent contradiction with special relativity. This paper shows that no such contradiction exists once a clear distinction is made between propagating causal influence and global constraint resolution. In a harmonic, structure-first framework, entangled systems constitute single coherent structures extended across space. Measurement imposes a local boundary condition that globally refines the allowed state of the system without transmitting energy, signals, or information. Relativistic causality remains intact because no controllable superluminal communication is possible. Quantum nonlocality reflects structural nonseparability, not superluminal dynamics.