Title: Instantons and Unitarily Inequivalent Quantum Vacua Author: Roman Derco Department: Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Supervisor: doc. Alfredo Iorio, Ph.D., Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Abstract: In the presented thesis we investigate the relationship between the topologically distinct instantonic vacua and the unitarily inequivalent vacua of the quantum field theory. We focus on quantum mechanical exam- ples, where instantons appear but the complications due to quantum gauge field theory are absent. A model for quantum dissipation and the theory of one particle escaping from a metastable minimum were compared, what led to some observations. A double well system was build from harmonic oscillators and an interaction term to get closer to the quantum dissipation model, where inequivalent representations are involved. We identified the particularly simple model of a quantum particle constrained on a circle to be the ideal toy model for spotting the relation among unitarily inequivalent vacua and topologically distinct vacua we were seeking for. 1
Title: Instantons and Unitarily Inequivalent Quantum Vacua Author: Roman Derco Department: Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Supervisor: doc. Alfredo Iorio, Ph.D., Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Abstract: In the presented thesis we investigate the relationship between the topologically distinct instantonic vacua and the unitarily inequivalent vacua of the quantum field theory. We focus on quantum mechanical exam- ples, where instantons appear but the complications due to quantum gauge field theory are absent. A model for quantum dissipation and the theory of one particle escaping from a metastable minimum were compared, what led to some observations. A double well system was build from harmonic oscillators and an interaction term to get closer to the quantum dissipation model, where inequivalent representations are involved. We identified the particularly simple model of a quantum particle constrained on a circle to be the ideal toy model for spotting the relation among unitarily inequivalent vacua and topologically distinct vacua we were seeking for. 1
Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the "reality" of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e., inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a "particle" will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.
Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the ‘reality’ of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a ‘particle’ will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.
de totstandkordng van dit proefschriftThis thesis consists of four parts.Notes and references are given at the end of each part.In part I we will give a review of the various notions of "representation" and "equivalence" that are used in theoretical physics and we will give a precise definition of the concept of "gauge equivalence".There we will meet the notion of gauge matrix.A method will be developed for obtaining the gauge matrices up to equivalence, as this is necessary in order to find the gauge equivalence classes of representations.In this method we will use the concept of superequivalence of group exponents, generalised here to group multipliers.Part I has a rather abstract mathematical character.Its results will be applied to physically interesting symmetry groups in the subsequent parts, where the notation and terminology of part I will be used freely.In part II we will consider the Poincaré as well as the Galilei symmetry group of uniform parallel electromagnetic fields.We will see that there are representations of these groups that are projectively equivalent, but that describe particles which arc, indeed, not "equivalent in every physical aspect".Specifically, particles in different Landau levels are described by projectively equivalent representations.However, those particles are not at all equivalent from the physical point of view; a transition between different Landau levels is not a trivial transformation of the mathematical description but it is a physical process that involves emission or absorption of energy.This is one of the most striking examples showing that, in general, projective equivalence of representations does not correspond to equivalence of physical systems.On the other hand, the different -13 -Landau levels are inequivalent with respect to the gauge equivalence concept.Another example which shows that gauge equivalence corresponds better than projective equivalence to "equivalence in every physical aspect" is provided by particles with different masses in uniform parallel electromagnetic fields (with Ε φ 0) in the Poincaré theory.Surprisingly, these particles are described by projectively equivalent representations; these representations are, however, gauge inequivalent.As a by-product we will find in part II what might be called a group theoretical derivation of the minimal coupling of a spinless particle in uniform parallel electromagnetic fields.Traditionally, the minimal coupling in quantum mechanics is "derived" by correspondence with classical mechanics.A derivation has also been given by a pseudo-invariance argument using instantaneous transformations.Although the latter argument may be the best that is available for arbitrary electromagnetic fields (that break space-time symmetry) it is in fact a "waste" of invariance in those cases where a special field is present that preserves a part of the symmetry.Indeed, in part II we obtain the minimal coupling in the Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon equations from the (exact rather than pseudo) symmetry group of the uniform parallel fields, without the detour via the free particle equations and without the "trick" of the substitution ІЭ ->• ІЭ -eA.This may be seen as a contribution to the process of remodelling traditional quantum mechanics by modern (group) theoretical tools.In part III other uniform electromagnetic fields are considered which are particular, in the sense that their connected symmetry groups are not isomorphic to the connected symmetry group of the uniform parallel fields.These are the uniform crossed fields under the Poincaré group and the uniform electric fields under the Galilei group.The equations -14of motion, including the minimal coupling, will be derived from the symmetry, analogous to part II.We will find a "Galilean subdynamics" for a Poincaré particle in uniform crossed fields.The exponents of the symmetry groups will give rise to an unexpected parameter in the equations of motion, which can be interpreted in terms of an anisotropic mass, corresponding to the anisotropy of the physical system due to the external field.In part IV we apply the notion of gauge equivalence of locally operating representations to some cosmologica!symmetry groups, operating on curved universes.For these groups the notion of superequivalence of group exponents plays a non-trivial role in the determination of a complete set of inequivalent gauge matrices.We will find that in cosmologica!models with one space dimension a free particle and a particle in an external field are described by projective representations of the symmetry group that are projectively equivalent but gauge inequivalent.This shows once more that the concept of gauge equivalence of locally operating representations is a more natural concept for the description of physical systems than that of the simple projective equivalence.As a by-product we will find that the minimal coupling is not necessarily the correct description of the interaction of a charged particle in an external field in a (relativistic) cosmologica!space-time.
There are significant problems involved in determining the ontology of quantum field theory (QFT). An ontology involving particles seems to be ruled out due to the problem of defining localized position operators, issues involving interactions in QFT, and, perhaps, the appearance of unitarily inequivalent representations. While this might imply that fields are the most natural ontology for QFT, the wavefunctional interpretation of QFT has significant drawbacks. A modified field ontology is examined where determinables are assigned to open bounded regions of spacetime instead of spacetime points.
Despite its name, Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has been built to describe interactions between localizable particles. For this reason the actual formalism of QFT is partly based on a suitable generalization of the one already used for systems of point particles. This circumstance gives rise to a number of conceptual problems, stemming essentially from the fact that the existence within QFT of non-equivalent representations implies the existence of field theories allowing, within the same theory, different, inequivalent, descriptions of particles. This led some authors to claim that in QFT the concept itself of particle should be abandoned. In this paper we will shortly discuss the validity of this claim, as well as the possibilities, so far existing, of building alternative versions of QFT, not designed in advance to allow some kind of particle representation. We will also spend some words about the generalizations of the concept itself of particle which could grant for a better cohabitation of particles and fields within a wider formulation of QFT. The latter is indispensable if we want to extend the range of application of QFT from particle physics or simple condensed matter physics to other domains of scientific research.
This dissertation gives a general account of the properties of unitarily inequivalent representations (UIRs) in both canonical quantum field theory and algebraic quantum field theory. A simple model is constructed and then used to show how to build a broad spectrum of UIRs including a version of Haag’s theorem. Haag and Kastler,P, two of the founding fathers of algebraic quantum field theory, argue that the problems posed by UIRs are solved by adopting a notion of equivalence that is weaker than unitary equivalence, which they refer to as physical equivalence. In the dissertation, it is shown that their notion does not provide a suitable classificatory schema. Some of the most important physical representations fail to satisfy the mathematical conditions of their notion. However, Haag and Kastler's notion has an unexpected connection with classical observables. A theorem is proven in which two representations make the same predictions with respect to all classical observables if and only if they satisfy their notion of physical equivalence. Following Haag and Kastler's lead, it was claimed by most proponents of algebraic quantum field theory that all physical content resides in a specific class of observables. It is shown in the dissertation that such claims are exaggerated and misleading. UIRs are used to elucidate the nature of quantum field theory by showing that UIRs have different expectation values for some classical observables of the system, such as temperature and chemical potential, which are not in Haag and Kastler’s specific class. It is shown how UIRs may be used to construct classical observables. To capture the physical content of quantum field theory it is shown that a much larger algebra than that of Haag and Kastler is necessary. Finally, the arguments that UIRs are incommensurable theories are shown to be flawed. The lesson of UIRs is that the mathematical structures in both canonical quantum field theory and Haag and Kastler’s version of algebraic quantum field theory are not sufficient to capture all of the physical content that UIRs represent. A suitable algebraic structure for quantum field theory is provided in the dissertation.