Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Classical Limit Of Quantum Mechanical Scattering; Summary

Hans Albrecht Bethe

Published Nov 23, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is of interest to exhibit the relationship between the quantum mechanical and classical descriptions of the elastic scattering process, and investigate the conditions under which the two descriptions are equivalent. We begin with the classical description.
DOI
10.1201/9780429493645-23

Related papers

An alternative classical approach to the quantum-mechanical definition of the scattering cross section

J.J. Fiol, R. G. Pregliasco, Inés Samengo +1 more

We discuss an alternative classical description of the nonrelativistic scattering process that is completely analogous to the time-independent formalism employed in quantum-mechanics textbooks. This approach provides an elementary introduction to the standard stationary scattering theory, embodying many of its essential concepts.

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1997•3 citations

Quantum-mechanical streamlines and classical trajectories in elastic scattering

H. J. Korsch, R Möhlenkamp

The hydrodynamic formulation of quantum mechanics is considered in the semiclassical limit and the relationship between quantum streamlines and classical trajectories is discussed. The flow pattern of the quantum streamlines can be described in terms of the interference of classical trajectories. The flow inside the classically forbidden regions is related to complex-valued classical trajectories. The analytically solvable cases of Coulomb and hard-sphere scattering are investigated in detail.

Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics•Jun 14, 1978•6 citations

The difference between the classical and quantum mechanical definitions of scattering cross sections and the problem of the classical limit

D. Sen, A. N. Basu, S. Sengupta

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1994•2 citations

Elementary quantum theory of elastic molecular scattering

C. J. G. Raw, A. J. Karrenbrock

It is the purpose of this article to show in outline how some of the basic ideas of quantum scattering theory can be used to supplement the usual topics covered in elementary quantum chemistry.

Journal of Chemical Education•Sep 1, 1969•0 citations

Descripción de la difracción de partículas mediante trayectorias cuánticas bohmianas.

Salvador Miret-Artés, Ángel S. Sanz

The trajectory-based formalism of Bohmian mechanics constitutes an alternative (but equivalent at a predictive level) approach to the standard formulation of quantum mechanics. Here we show the advantages of this formalism in providing both an accurate description and a novel interpretation when it is applied to different phenomena of interest in elastic particle scattering, such as diffraction by “hard” and “soft” slits, and quantum vortical dynamics due to the presence of single adsorbates. These problems illustrate fairly well how quantum trajectories are able to satisfactorily reproduce the main features of real scattering experiments as well as to provide a causal insight of the underlying dynamics

Revista española de física•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

12. Particles

Arnold Neumaier

As we have seen in Section 8.4, the basis of our perception of an objective reality is statistical mechanics and field theory. These are routinely used in equilibrium and nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics (see, for example, Calzetta & Hu [59]), which govern the macroscopic laws of everyday life. Thus the quantum theory of fields must be the fundamental description of Nature. Therefore, the simpler quantum mechanics of particles is necessarily a derived description. This chapter discusses the extent to which a particle picture of matter and radiation is appropriate. In relativistic quantum field theory, particles appear only as asymptotic excitations of the fields. The quantum particle concept therefore makes mathematical (and intuitive) sense only under very special circumstances, namely in those where a system actually behaves like particles do: - As quasiparticles, they are useful in the domain, where the geometric optics perspective applies. - Before and after a scattering event in a dilute gas or a particle collider ring, particles can be considered as being essentially free. During the very short interaction time itself, the scattering process cannot be described by a particle picture, but needs a hydromechanical description or a kinetic description via Kadanoff-Baym equations. Already at the very beginning of modern quantum mechanics, when Born found his probability interpretation, the scattering process of single particles in an external classical field was understood (see Section 14.1 of the Appendix) to be a wave process relating initially and finally stationary particles, freely moving in their center of mass frame. It is a historical accident that one continues to use the name particle in the many microscopic situations, where it is grossly inappropriate to think of it with the classical meaning of a tiny bullet moving through space. When we restrict the use of the particle concept to where it is appropriate, or when we do not think of particles as “objects”, in both cases all mystery is gone, and the foundations become fully rational. The inappropriate focus on the particle aspect of quantum mechanics created the appearance of mystery; common sense is restored by focussing instead on the field aspect. To substantiate the above summary view, we give in Section 12.1 an analysis of the photoelectric effect and in Section 12.2 a review of the origin of particle tracks. This leads in Section 12.3 to a discussion about the reality of particles. In the remainder of the chapter, we discuss the relation between fields and particles in more detail. Section 12.4 poses the problem how the nonrelativistic multiparticle description arises from relativistic quantum field theory. Section 12.5 considers the case of free quantum fields, and Section 12.6 the case of interacting quantum fields. Section 12.7, the final section, discusses the semiclassical view of quasiparticles in the approximation familiar from geometric optics.

De Gruyter eBooks•Oct 24, 2019•0 citations
The trajectory-based formalism of Bohmian mechanics constitutes an alternative (but equivalent at a predictive level) approach to the standard formulation of quantum mechanics. Here we show the advantages of this formalism in providing both an accurate description and a novel interpretation when it is applied to different phenomena of interest in elastic particle scattering, such as diffraction by “hard” and “soft” slits, and quantum vortical dynamics due to the presence of single adsorbates. These problems illustrate fairly well how quantum trajectories are able to satisfactorily reproduce the main features of real scattering experiments as well as to provide a causal insight of the underlying dynamics
As we have seen in Section 8.4, the basis of our perception of an objective reality is statistical mechanics and field theory. These are routinely used in equilibrium and nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics (see, for example, Calzetta & Hu [59]), which govern the macroscopic laws of everyday life. Thus the quantum theory of fields must be the fundamental description of Nature. Therefore, the simpler quantum mechanics of particles is necessarily a derived description. This chapter discusses the extent to which a particle picture of matter and radiation is appropriate. In relativistic quantum field theory, particles appear only as asymptotic excitations of the fields. The quantum particle concept therefore makes mathematical (and intuitive) sense only under very special circumstances, namely in those where a system actually behaves like particles do: - As quasiparticles, they are useful in the domain, where the geometric optics perspective applies. - Before and after a scattering event in a dilute gas or a particle collider ring, particles can be considered as being essentially free. During the very short interaction time itself, the scattering process cannot be described by a particle picture, but needs a hydromechanical description or a kinetic description via Kadanoff-Baym equations. Already at the very beginning of modern quantum mechanics, when Born found his probability interpretation, the scattering process of single particles in an external classical field was understood (see Section 14.1 of the Appendix) to be a wave process relating initially and finally stationary particles, freely moving in their center of mass frame. It is a historical accident that one continues to use the name particle in the many microscopic situations, where it is grossly inappropriate to think of it with the classical meaning of a tiny bullet moving through space. When we restrict the use of the particle concept to where it is appropriate, or when we do not think of particles as “objects”, in both cases all mystery is gone, and the foundations become fully rational. The inappropriate focus on the particle aspect of quantum mechanics created the appearance of mystery; common sense is restored by focussing instead on the field aspect. To substantiate the above summary view, we give in Section 12.1 an analysis of the photoelectric effect and in Section 12.2 a review of the origin of particle tracks. This leads in Section 12.3 to a discussion about the reality of particles. In the remainder of the chapter, we discuss the relation between fields and particles in more detail. Section 12.4 poses the problem how the nonrelativistic multiparticle description arises from relativistic quantum field theory. Section 12.5 considers the case of free quantum fields, and Section 12.6 the case of interacting quantum fields. Section 12.7, the final section, discusses the semiclassical view of quasiparticles in the approximation familiar from geometric optics.