Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

The difference between the classical and quantum mechanical definitions of scattering cross sections and the problem of the classical limit

D. Sen, A. N. Basu, S. Sengupta

Published Jan 1, 1994• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(94)90769-2

Related papers

Supplement to advanced quantum mechanics : On the relation between scattering matrix elements and cross-sections

Freeman J. Dyson

•Apr 29, 2015•0 citations

Classical and quantum scattering cross-sections on the impenetrable sphere

G N Afanasiev, M. B. Dobromyslov, V. P. Schpakov

Unknown eBooks•Jan 1, 1980•0 citations

Light Scattering in Terms of Oscillator Strengths and Refractive Indices

Carl M. Penney

Quantum-mechanical expressions for nonresonance-dipole light-scattering cross sections are related to corresponding expressions for oscillator strengths and refractive indices. In particular, Rayleigh and Raman cross sections for atoms are expressed in terms of oscillator strengths and vector-coupling coefficients. Several of our results, including the relationship between Rayleigh scattering and refractive index, differ in general from the corresponding results of classical dispersion theory. We show that these differences arise from antisymmetric components Ckja = (Ckj − Cjk)/2 of the polarizability tensor, which have been neglected in the classical analyses. Calculated Rayleigh cross sections for cesium and aluminum atoms, and Raman cross sections for aluminum atoms are presented to illustrate our results. The antisymmetric contribution is found to be substantial in all of these cross sections; its most obvious effect is to cause the depolarization (for linearly polarized incident light) to exceed 34 over extended wavelength ranges away from resonance. On the other hand, for atoms initially in states of zero angular momentum, and molecules under conditions which allow the use of Placzek’s polarizability approximation, our results agree with those of classical dispersion theory.

Journal of the Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1969•107 citations

Quantum-mechanical theory of scattering and the problem of classical limit

A. N. Basu, S. Sengupta

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•May 1, 1991•4 citations

Cross sections in quantum mechanics

Enrique Campesino-Romeo, John R. Taylor

The definition of scattering cross sections requires an averaging over wavepackets with random impact parameters ρ; this leads to an integral of the scattering probability over all ρ in a plane perpendicular to the incident beam. We show that, for scattering off a potential which is O (1/rβ) as r→∞, the scattering probability is O (1/ρ2β−4) as ρ→∞. Thus for any β ≳ 3, the integral over impact parameters is well-defined and convergent.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1975•3 citations

Classical limit of scattering in quantum mechanics—A general approach

D Sen, A. N. Basu, S. Sengupta

Pramana•Mar 1, 1997•4 citations
Quantum-mechanical expressions for nonresonance-dipole light-scattering cross sections are related to corresponding expressions for oscillator strengths and refractive indices. In particular, Rayleigh and Raman cross sections for atoms are expressed in terms of oscillator strengths and vector-coupling coefficients. Several of our results, including the relationship between Rayleigh scattering and refractive index, differ in general from the corresponding results of classical dispersion theory. We show that these differences arise from antisymmetric components Ckja = (Ckj − Cjk)/2 of the polarizability tensor, which have been neglected in the classical analyses. Calculated Rayleigh cross sections for cesium and aluminum atoms, and Raman cross sections for aluminum atoms are presented to illustrate our results. The antisymmetric contribution is found to be substantial in all of these cross sections; its most obvious effect is to cause the depolarization (for linearly polarized incident light) to exceed 34 over extended wavelength ranges away from resonance. On the other hand, for atoms initially in states of zero angular momentum, and molecules under conditions which allow the use of Placzek’s polarizability approximation, our results agree with those of classical dispersion theory.