Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Symmetry

Building Group Key Establishment on Group Theory: A Modular Approach

Jens-Matthias Bohli, María Isabel González Vasco, Rainer Steinwandt

Published Jan 30, 2020• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A group key establishment protocol is presented and proven secure in the common reference string mode. The protocol builds on a group-theoretic assumption, and a concrete example can be obtained with a decision Diffie–Hellman assumption. The protocol is derived from a two-party solution by means of a protocol compiler presented by Abdalla et al. at TCC 2007, evidencing the possibility of meaningfully integrating cryptographic and group-theoretic tools in cryptographic protocol design. This compiler uses a standard ring configuration, where all users behave symmetrically, exchanging keys with their left and right neighbor, which are later combined to yield a shared group key.

DOI
10.3390/sym12020197

Related papers

A Security Weakness in a Generic Construction of a Group Key Exchange Protocol.

Junghyun Nam

Protocols for group key exchange are cryptographic algorithms that allow a group of parties communicating over a public network to come up with a common secret key. One of the interesting results of research on group key exchange is the protocol compiler presented by Abdalla et al. in TCC ’07. Abdalla et al.’s compiler shows how one can transform any authenticated 2-party key exchange protocol into an authenticated group key exchange protocol with 2 more rounds of communication. This compiler certainly is elegant in its genericness, sym-metricity, simplicity and efficiency. However, the situation completely changes when it comes to security. In this work, we reveal a major security weakness in Abdalla et al.’s compiler and show how to address it. The security weakness uncovered here implies that Abdalla et al.’s proof of security for their compiler is invalid.

•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

1 Password-Authenticated Constant-Round Group Key Establishment with a Common Reference String

Jens-Matthias Bohli, María Isabel González Vasco, González Vasco +1 more

Abstract. A provably secure password-authenticated protocol for group key establishment in the common reference string (CRS) model is presented. Our construction assumes the participating users to share a common password and combines projective hashing as introduced by Cramer and Shoup with a construction of Burmester and Desmedt. Our protocol is constant-round. Namely, it is a three-round protocol that can be seen as generalization of a two-party proposal of Gennaro and Lindell.

•Jul 25, 2013•27 citations

Provably secure authenticated group Diffie-Hellman key exchange

Emmanuel Bresson, Olivier Chevassut, David Pointcheval

Authenticated key-exchange protocols allow two participants A and B , communicating over a public network and each holding an authentication means to exchange a shared secret value. Methods designed to deal with this cryptographic problem ensure A (resp. B ) that no other participants aside from B (resp. A ) can learn any information about the agreed value and often also ensure A and B that their respective partner has actually computed this value. A natural extension to this cryptographic method is to consider a pool of participants exchanging a shared secret value and to provide a formal treatment for it. Starting from the famous two-party Diffie--Hellman (DH) key-exchange protocol and from its authenticated variants, security experts have extended it to the multiparty setting for over a decade and, in the past few years, completed a formal analysis in the framework of modern cryptography. The present paper synthesizes this body of work on the provably-secure authenticated group DH key exchange.

ACM Transactions on Information and System Security•Jul 1, 2007•88 citations

Secure Group Key Establishment Revisited.

Jens-Matthias Bohli, María Isabel González Vasco, Rainer Steinwandt

We examine the popular proof models for group key establishment of Bresson et al. [BCPQ01,BCP01] and point out missing security properties addressing malicious protocol participants. We show that established group key establishment schemes from CRYPTO 2003 and ASIACRYPT 2004 do not fully meet these new requirements. Next to giving a formal definition of these extended security properties, we prove a variant of the explored proposal from ASIACRYPT 2004 secure in this stricter sense. Our proof builds on the Computational Diffie Hellman (CDH) assumption and the random oracle model.

•Jan 1, 2005•12 citations

DDH-based Group Key Agreement in a Mobile Environment.

Junghyun Nam, Jinwoo Lee, Seungjoo Kim +1 more

A group key agreement protocol is designed to efficiently implement secure multicast channels for a group of parties communicating over an untrusted, open network by allowing them to agree on a common secret key. In the past decade many problems related to group key agreement have been tackled and solved (diminished if not solved), and recently some constant-round protocols have been proven secure in concrete, realistic setting. However, all forward-secure protocols so far are still too expensive for small mobile devices. In this paper we propose a new constant-round protocol well suited for a mobile environment and prove its security under the Decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption. The protocol meets simplicity, efficiency, and all the desired security properties.

•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

SERVER-ASSISTED LONG-TERM SECURE 3-PARTY KEY ESTABLISHMENT

Kashi Neupane, Rainer Steinwandt

Consider a scenario where a server S shares a symmetric key k U with each user U. Building on a 2-party solution of Bohli et al., we describe an authenticated 3-party key establishment which remains secure if a computational Bilinear Diffie Hellman problem is hard or the server is uncorrupted. If the BDH assumption holds during a protocol execution, but is invalidated later, entity authentication and integrity of the protocol are still guaranteed.

International Conference on Security and Cryptography•Jan 1, 2010•4 citations
A group key establishment protocol is presented and proven secure in the common reference string mode. The protocol builds on a group-theoretic assumption, and a concrete example can be obtained with a decision Diffie–Hellman assumption. The protocol is derived from a two-party solution by means of a protocol compiler presented by Abdalla et al. at TCC 2007, evidencing the possibility of meaningfully integrating cryptographic and group-theoretic tools in cryptographic protocol design. This compiler uses a standard ring configuration, where all users behave symmetrically, exchanging keys with their left and right neighbor, which are later combined to yield a shared group key.
Protocols for group key exchange are cryptographic algorithms that allow a group of parties communicating over a public network to come up with a common secret key. One of the interesting results of research on group key exchange is the protocol compiler presented by Abdalla et al. in TCC ’07. Abdalla et al.’s compiler shows how one can transform any authenticated 2-party key exchange protocol into an authenticated group key exchange protocol with 2 more rounds of communication. This compiler certainly is elegant in its genericness, sym-metricity, simplicity and efficiency. However, the situation completely changes when it comes to security. In this work, we reveal a major security weakness in Abdalla et al.’s compiler and show how to address it. The security weakness uncovered here implies that Abdalla et al.’s proof of security for their compiler is invalid.
Authenticated key-exchange protocols allow two participants A and B , communicating over a public network and each holding an authentication means to exchange a shared secret value. Methods designed to deal with this cryptographic problem ensure A (resp. B ) that no other participants aside from B (resp. A ) can learn any information about the agreed value and often also ensure A and B that their respective partner has actually computed this value. A natural extension to this cryptographic method is to consider a pool of participants exchanging a shared secret value and to provide a formal treatment for it. Starting from the famous two-party Diffie--Hellman (DH) key-exchange protocol and from its authenticated variants, security experts have extended it to the multiparty setting for over a decade and, in the past few years, completed a formal analysis in the framework of modern cryptography. The present paper synthesizes this body of work on the provably-secure authenticated group DH key exchange.
We examine the popular proof models for group key establishment of Bresson et al. [BCPQ01,BCP01] and point out missing security properties addressing malicious protocol participants. We show that established group key establishment schemes from CRYPTO 2003 and ASIACRYPT 2004 do not fully meet these new requirements. Next to giving a formal definition of these extended security properties, we prove a variant of the explored proposal from ASIACRYPT 2004 secure in this stricter sense. Our proof builds on the Computational Diffie Hellman (CDH) assumption and the random oracle model.
A group key agreement protocol is designed to efficiently implement secure multicast channels for a group of parties communicating over an untrusted, open network by allowing them to agree on a common secret key. In the past decade many problems related to group key agreement have been tackled and solved (diminished if not solved), and recently some constant-round protocols have been proven secure in concrete, realistic setting. However, all forward-secure protocols so far are still too expensive for small mobile devices. In this paper we propose a new constant-round protocol well suited for a mobile environment and prove its security under the Decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption. The protocol meets simplicity, efficiency, and all the desired security properties.