Standard Leggett-Garg inequalities (SLGIs) were formulated for testing incompatibility between the classical world view of macrorealism and quantum mechanics. In recent times, various other formulations such as the Wigner form of Leggett-Garg inequalities (WLGIs), entropic Leggett-Garg inequalities (ELGIs), and the no-signaling-in-time (NSIT) condition have also been proposed. It was also recently argued that $no$ set of SLGIs can provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for macrorealism, but a suitable conjunction of NSIT conditions provides the same. In this paper, we first provide a comparative study of the various formulations of Leggett-Garg inequalities (LGIs) for testing macrorealism pertaining to the two different unsharp measurements. While the violations of WLGIs are more robust than SLGIs and ELGIs for spin positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), here we demonstrate that for the case of biased POVMs the quantum violations of both SLGIs and ELGIs provide the same robustness as WLGIs. Importantly, the violations of all formulations of LGIs can be achieved for any nonzero value of unsharpness parameter. We have also studied the connection between LGIs and NSIT conditions. Further, we investigate the role of the joint measurability of the POVMs in the violation of LGIs and find that there is $no$ generic connection.Standard Leggett-Garg inequalities (SLGIs) were formulated for testing incompatibility between the classical world view of macrorealism and quantum mechanics. In recent times, various other formulations such as the Wigner form of Leggett-Garg inequalities (WLGIs), entropic Leggett-Garg inequalities (ELGIs), and the no-signaling-in-time (NSIT) condition have also been proposed. It was also recently argued that $no$ set of SLGIs can provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for macrorealism, but a suitable conjunction of NSIT conditions provides the same. In this paper, we first provide a comparative study of the various formulations of Leggett-Garg inequalities (LGIs) for testing macrorealism pertaining to the two different unsharp measurements. While the violations of WLGIs are more robust than SLGIs and ELGIs for spin positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), here we demonstrate that for the case of biased POVMs the quantum violations of both SLGIs and ELGIs provide the same robustness as WLGIs. Importantly, the violations of all formulations of LGIs can be achieved for any nonzero value of unsharpness parameter. We have also studied the connection between LGIs and NSIT conditions. Further, we investigate the role of the joint measurability of the POVMs in the violation of LGIs and find that there is $no$ generic connection.

arXiv:1705.09934Physical Review AOct 12, 201731 citations

A Simple Note on the Leggett-Garg Inequality

Biswaranjan Panda

Jan 1, 20250 citations

Leggett-Garg inequalities

Eduard Bordas Marchante

Jan 1, 20180 citations

Comparison between the effects of Hamiltonian and Liouvillian exceptional points on the Leggett–Garg inequality and no-signaling-in-time conditions

Kun-Jie Zhou, Jian Zou, Bao-Ming Xu +1 more

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the effect of exceptional points (EPs) on the violation of Leggett–Garg inequality (LGI) and no-signaling-in-time (NSIT) conditions and compare the different effects between the Hamiltonian EP (HEP) and Liouvillian EP (LEP) on those violations. We consider an open system consisting of two coupled qubits and each qubit is contacted with a thermal bath at a different temperature. In the case of omitting quantum jumps, we find that the system exhibits a second-order HEP, which separates the parameter space into an overdamped regime and an underdamped regime. In this situation, the LGI and NSIT conditions can be violated in both regimes and not violated at the HEP. In the case of without omitting quantum jumps, we find that the system exhibits a third-order LEP, which also separates the parameter space into an overdamped regime and an underdamped regime. In this situation, the LGI can only be violated in the underdamped regime with large coupling strength between the qubits. Conversely, the NSIT conditions can be violated in both regimes, as well as at the LEP, except in the overdamped regime with small coupling strength between the qubits. Comparing the violations of the LGI and NSIT conditions with HEP and LEP, we find that the quantum jumps would reduce the generation of coherence, enhance the decoherence, and lead to narrower parameter regimes that the LGI and NSIT conditions can be violated. Furthermore, in both cases, the NSIT conditions can be violated in a wider parameter regime than the LGI.Abstract In this paper, we investigate the effect of exceptional points (EPs) on the violation of Leggett–Garg inequality (LGI) and no-signaling-in-time (NSIT) conditions and compare the different effects between the Hamiltonian EP (HEP) and Liouvillian EP (LEP) on those violations. We consider an open system consisting of two coupled qubits and each qubit is contacted with a thermal bath at a different temperature. In the case of omitting quantum jumps, we find that the system exhibits a second-order HEP, which separates the parameter space into an overdamped regime and an underdamped regime. In this situation, the LGI and NSIT conditions can be violated in both regimes and not violated at the HEP. In the case of without omitting quantum jumps, we find that the system exhibits a third-order LEP, which also separates the parameter space into an overdamped regime and an underdamped regime. In this situation, the LGI can only be violated in the underdamped regime with large coupling strength between the qubits. Conversely, the NSIT conditions can be violated in both regimes, as well as at the LEP, except in the overdamped regime with small coupling strength between the qubits. Comparing the violations of the LGI and NSIT conditions with HEP and LEP, we find that the quantum jumps would reduce the generation of coherence, enhance the decoherence, and lead to narrower parameter regimes that the LGI and NSIT conditions can be violated. Furthermore, in both cases, the NSIT conditions can be violated in a wider parameter regime than the LGI.

Communications in Theoretical PhysicsFeb 13, 20250 citations

Various formulations of inequivalent Leggett–Garg inequalities

Swati Kumari, A. K. Pan

Abstract In two-party, two-input and two-output measurement scenario only relevant Bell’s inequality is the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) form. They also provide the necessary and sufficient conditions (NSCs) for local realism. Any other form, such as, Clauser–Horne and Wigner forms reduce to the CHSH one. The standard Leggett–Garg inequalities, proposed for testing incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory, are often considered to be the temporal analog of CHSH inequalities. However, they do not provide the NSCs for macrorealism. There is thus scope of formulating new macrorealist inequalities inequivalent and stronger than the standard Leggett–Garg inequalities. In this paper, we propose two different classes of macrorealistic inequalities. A class of inequalities which are equivalent to the standard ones in macrorealist model but inequivalent and stronger in quantum theory, and the other class of inequalities are inequivalent to the all the other formulations of Leggett–Garg inequalities both in macrorealist model and in quantum theory. The latter class of macrorealist inequalities reveals the incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory for specific cases even when any other formulation of Leggett–Garg inequalities fails to do so. We extend the formulations of inequivalent Leggett–Garg inequalities to the four-time and two-time measurement scenarios. Further, we provide a brief discussion about the alternative formulation of macrorealism known as the no-signaling in time (NSIT) conditions.Abstract In two-party, two-input and two-output measurement scenario only relevant Bell’s inequality is the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) form. They also provide the necessary and sufficient conditions (NSCs) for local realism. Any other form, such as, Clauser–Horne and Wigner forms reduce to the CHSH one. The standard Leggett–Garg inequalities, proposed for testing incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory, are often considered to be the temporal analog of CHSH inequalities. However, they do not provide the NSCs for macrorealism. There is thus scope of formulating new macrorealist inequalities inequivalent and stronger than the standard Leggett–Garg inequalities. In this paper, we propose two different classes of macrorealistic inequalities. A class of inequalities which are equivalent to the standard ones in macrorealist model but inequivalent and stronger in quantum theory, and the other class of inequalities are inequivalent to the all the other formulations of Leggett–Garg inequalities both in macrorealist model and in quantum theory. The latter class of macrorealist inequalities reveals the incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory for specific cases even when any other formulation of Leggett–Garg inequalities fails to do so. We extend the formulations of inequivalent Leggett–Garg inequalities to the four-time and two-time measurement scenarios. Further, we provide a brief discussion about the alternative formulation of macrorealism known as the no-signaling in time (NSIT) conditions.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalDec 3, 20203 citations

Inequivalence between various formulations of Leggett-Garg inequalities

Swati Kumari, A. K. Pan

May 30, 20170 citations

no

set of SLGIs can provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for macrorealism, but a suitable conjunction of NSIT conditions provides the same. In this paper, we first provide a comparative study of the various formulations of Leggett-Garg inequalities (LGIs) for testing macrorealism pertaining to the two different unsharp measurements. While the violations of WLGIs are more robust than SLGIs and ELGIs for spin positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), here we demonstrate that for the case of biased POVMs the quantum violations of both SLGIs and ELGIs provide the same robustness as WLGIs. Importantly, the violations of all formulations of LGIs can be achieved for any nonzero value of unsharpness parameter. We have also studied the connection between LGIs and NSIT conditions. Further, we investigate the role of the joint measurability of the POVMs in the violation of LGIs and find that there is

no

generic connection.