Problems in Quantum mechanics and quantum statistics

Alexander Semenovich Holevo

Shiro Ishikawa

In this paper, we study and answer the following fundamental problems concerning classical equilibrium statistical mechanics: 1): Is the principle of equal a priori probabilities indispensable for equilibrium statistical mechanics? 2): Is the ergodic hypothesis related to equilibrium statistical mechanics? Note that these problems are not yet answered, since there are several opinions for the formulation of equilibrium statistical mechanics. In order to answer the above questions, we first introduce measurement theory (i.e., the theory of quantum mechanical world view), which is characterized as the linguistic turn of quantum mechanics. And we propose the measurement theoretical foundation of equili-brium statistical mechanics, and further, answer the above 1) and 2), that is, 1) is “No”, but, 2) is “Yes”.

Nicholas Maxwell

It is argued that the so-called minimal statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics does not completely resolve the measurement problem in that this view is unable to show that quantum mechanics can dispense with classical physics when it comes to a treatment of the measuring interaction. It is suggested that the view that quantum mechanics applies to individual systems should not be too hastily abandoned, in that this view gives perhaps the best hope of leading to a version of quantum mechanics which does provide a complete solution to the measurement problem.

B. Freedman. Physics Department

R. Shankar

We have thus far looked at the classical statistical mechanics of a collection of Ising spins in terms of their partition function. We have seen how to extract the free energy per site and correlation functions of the d = 1 Ising model. We will now consider a second way to do this. While the results are, of course, going to be the same, the method exposes a deep connection between classical statistical mechanics in d = 1 and the quantum mechanics of a single spin-12 particle. This is the simplest way to learn about a connection that has a much wider range of applicability: the classical statistical mechanics of a problem in d dimensions may be mapped on to a quantum problem in d – 1 dimensions. The nature of the quantum variable will depend on the nature of the classical variable. In general, the allowed values of the classical variable ( s =±1 in our example) will correspond to the maximal set of simultaneous eigenvalues of the operators in the quantum problem ( σz in our example). Subsequently we will study a problem where the classical variable called x lies in the range –∞ < x < ∞ and will correspond to the eigenvalues of the familiar position operator X that appears in the quantum problem. The correlation functions will become the expectation values in the ground state of a certain transfer matrix . The different sites in the d = 1 lattice will correspond to different, discrete, times in the life of the quantum degree of freedom. By the same token, a quantum problem may be mapped into a statistical mechanics problem in one-higher dimensions, essentially by running the derivation backwards. In this case the resulting partition function is also called the path integral for the quantum problem. There is, however, no guarantee that the classical partition function generated by a legitimate quantum problem (with a Hermitian Hamiltonian) will always make physical sense: the corresponding Boltzmann weights may be negative, or even complex! In the quantum mechanics we first learn, time t is a real parameter. For our purposes we also need to get familiar with quantum mechanics in which time takes on purely imaginary values t = –iτ , where τ is real. It turns out that it is possible to define such a Euclidean quantum mechanics .