Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

World Journal of Mechanics

Ergodic Hypothesis and Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics in the Quantum Mechanical World View

Shiro Ishikawa

Published Jan 1, 2012• 15 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper, we study and answer the following fundamental problems concerning classical equilibrium statistical mechanics: 1): Is the principle of equal a priori probabilities indispensable for equilibrium statistical mechanics? 2): Is the ergodic hypothesis related to equilibrium statistical mechanics? Note that these problems are not yet answered, since there are several opinions for the formulation of equilibrium statistical mechanics. In order to answer the above questions, we first introduce measurement theory (i.e., the theory of quantum mechanical world view), which is characterized as the linguistic turn of quantum mechanics. And we propose the measurement theoretical foundation of equili-brium statistical mechanics, and further, answer the above 1) and 2), that is, 1) is “No”, but, 2) is “Yes”.

DOI
10.4236/wjm.2012.22014

Related papers

Ergodicity, eigenstate thermalization, and the foundations of statistical mechanics in quantum and classical systems

Lorenzo Campos Venuti, Liu, Lawrence

Boltzmann's ergodic hypothesis furnishes a possible explanation for the emergence of statistical mechanics in the framework of classical physics. In quantum mechanics, the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis (ETH) is instead generally considered as a possible route to thermalization. This is because the notion of ergodicity itself is vague in the quantum world and it is often simply taken as a synonym for thermalization. Here we show, in an elementary way, that when quantum ergodicity is properly defined, it is, in fact, equivalent to ETH. In turn, ergodicity is equivalent to thermalization, thus implying the equivalence of thermalization and ETH. This result previously appeared in [De Palma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 220401 (2015)], but becomes particularly clear in the present context. We also show that it is possible to define a classical analogue of ETH which is implicitly assumed to be satisfied when constructing classical statistical mechanics. Classical and quantum statistical mechanics are built according to the familiar standard prescription. This prescription, however, is ontologically justified only in the quantum world.

arXiv:1904.02336•Apr 4, 2019•3 citations

Quantum Foundations of Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics

Orly Shenker

Statistical mechanics is often taken to be the paradigm of a successful inter-theoretic reduction, which explains the high-level phenomena by using the fundamental theories of physics together with some auxiliary hypotheses. The central idea of statistical mechanics is that in order to account for the thermodynamic regularities only partial information about the microstates is needed, concerning some macrovariables of them, that is, concerning the fact that they belong to certain macrostates in which all the microstates share the same macrovariables. An important example of a thermodynamic property, which needs to be explained in quantum statistical mechanics, is that of being in thermal equilibrium. The thermodynamic law of approach to equilibrium says that systems, prepared in non-equilibrium states, will invariably evolve to equilibrium states fixed by the constraints on these systems, and remain in them indefinitely.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 11, 2021•2 citations

A Measurement Theoretical Foundation of Statistics

Shiro Ishikawa

It is a matter of course that Kolmogorov’s probability theory is a very useful mathematical tool for the analysis of statistics. However, this fact never means that statistics is based on Kolmogorov’s probability theory, since it is not guaranteed that mathematics and our world are connected. In order that mathematics asserts some statements concerning our world, a certain theory (so called “world view”) mediates between mathematics and our world. Recently we propose measurement theory (i.e., the theory of the quantum mechanical world view), which is characterized as the linguistic turn of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we assert that statistics is based on measurement theory. And, for example, we show, from the pure theoretical point of view (i.e., from the measurement theoretical point of view), that regression analysis can not be justified without Bayes’ theorem. This may imply that even the conventional classification of (Fisher’s) statistics and Bayesian statistics should be reconsidered.

Applied Mathematics•Jan 1, 2012•24 citations

An Alternative Interpretation of Statistical Mechanics

Casey D. McCoy

In this paper I propose an interpretation of classical statistical mechanics that centers on taking seriously the idea that probability measures represent complete states of statistical mechanical systems. I show how this leads naturally to the idea that the stochasticity of statistical mechanics is associated directly with the observables of the theory rather than with the microstates (as traditional accounts would have it). The usual assumption that microstates are representationally significant in the theory is therefore dispensable, a consequence which suggests interesting possibilities for developing non-equilibrium statistical mechanics and investigating inter-theoretic answers to the foundational questions of statistical mechanics.

Erkenntnis•Jun 6, 2018•14 citations

Quantum Probability Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Jürg Martin Fröhlich, Baptiste Schubnel

We attempt to contribute some novel points of view to the "foundations of quantum mechanics", using mathematical tools from "quantum probability theory" (such as the theory of operator algebras). We first introduce an abstract algebraic framework for the formulation of mathematical models of physical systems that is general enough to encompass classical and quantum mechanical models. After a short discussion on the properties of classical systems (realism and determinism), we move on to the study of a general class of quantum-mechanical models of physical systems and explain what some of the key problems in a quantum theory of observations and measurements are. In the last part of our essay, we attempt to elucidate the roles played by entanglement between a system and its environment and of information loss in understanding "decoherence" and "dephasing", which are key mechanisms in a quantum theory of measurements and experiments. We also discuss the problem of "time in quantum mechanics" and sketch an answer to the question when an experiment can be considered to have been completed successfully.

arXiv:1310.1484•Oct 5, 2013•6 citations

New Ergodic Principle:A Unified Projection Framework for Quantum Mechanics,Statistical Mechanics, and Mathematical Foundations

Masaru Morimoto

The classical ergodic hypothesis has served as a foundational assumption in statistical mechanics for more than a century. However, its core claims---that a physical system explores all accessible microstates over long times, and that time averages equal ensemble averages---are incompatible with the behavior of many real systems, including glasses, biological molecules, and complex non-equilibrium systems. Moreover, the classical formulation lacks a mechanism for information loss, observer dependence, and hierarchical coarse-graining. This paper introduces the \emph{New Ergodic Principle} (NEP), a unified projection framework that integrates (i) unitary time evolution from quantum mechanics, (ii) measurement-induced projection and information loss, and (iii) hierarchical projection from the OS-model, which formalizes observer-dependent coarse-graining. NEP replaces the classical ergodic hypothesis with a three-layer projection structure, yielding a generalized ergodic average:\[\langle A \rangle_{\mathrm{NEP}}= \mathrm{Tr}\!\left[\pi_k\!\left(\sum_i P_i U(t)\rho U^\dagger(t) P_i\right) A\right].\]This formulation naturally incorporates non-ergodic systems, clarifies the origin of irreversibility, and provides a mathematically coherent foundation for equilibrium and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. The NEP framework also suggests a unified mathematical basis for physics grounded in projection theory rather than classical set-theoretic structures.

•Feb 1, 2026•0 citations
In this paper, we study and answer the following fundamental problems concerning classical equilibrium statistical mechanics: 1): Is the principle of equal a priori probabilities indispensable for equilibrium statistical mechanics? 2): Is the ergodic hypothesis related to equilibrium statistical mechanics? Note that these problems are not yet answered, since there are several opinions for the formulation of equilibrium statistical mechanics. In order to answer the above questions, we first introduce measurement theory (i.e., the theory of quantum mechanical world view), which is characterized as the linguistic turn of quantum mechanics. And we propose the measurement theoretical foundation of equili-brium statistical mechanics, and further, answer the above 1) and 2), that is, 1) is “No”, but, 2) is “Yes”.
Boltzmann's ergodic hypothesis furnishes a possible explanation for the emergence of statistical mechanics in the framework of classical physics. In quantum mechanics, the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis (ETH) is instead generally considered as a possible route to thermalization. This is because the notion of ergodicity itself is vague in the quantum world and it is often simply taken as a synonym for thermalization. Here we show, in an elementary way, that when quantum ergodicity is properly defined, it is, in fact, equivalent to ETH. In turn, ergodicity is equivalent to thermalization, thus implying the equivalence of thermalization and ETH. This result previously appeared in [De Palma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 220401 (2015)], but becomes particularly clear in the present context. We also show that it is possible to define a classical analogue of ETH which is implicitly assumed to be satisfied when constructing classical statistical mechanics. Classical and quantum statistical mechanics are built according to the familiar standard prescription. This prescription, however, is ontologically justified only in the quantum world.
Statistical mechanics is often taken to be the paradigm of a successful inter-theoretic reduction, which explains the high-level phenomena by using the fundamental theories of physics together with some auxiliary hypotheses. The central idea of statistical mechanics is that in order to account for the thermodynamic regularities only partial information about the microstates is needed, concerning some macrovariables of them, that is, concerning the fact that they belong to certain macrostates in which all the microstates share the same macrovariables. An important example of a thermodynamic property, which needs to be explained in quantum statistical mechanics, is that of being in thermal equilibrium. The thermodynamic law of approach to equilibrium says that systems, prepared in non-equilibrium states, will invariably evolve to equilibrium states fixed by the constraints on these systems, and remain in them indefinitely.
It is a matter of course that Kolmogorov’s probability theory is a very useful mathematical tool for the analysis of statistics. However, this fact never means that statistics is based on Kolmogorov’s probability theory, since it is not guaranteed that mathematics and our world are connected. In order that mathematics asserts some statements concerning our world, a certain theory (so called “world view”) mediates between mathematics and our world. Recently we propose measurement theory (i.e., the theory of the quantum mechanical world view), which is characterized as the linguistic turn of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we assert that statistics is based on measurement theory. And, for example, we show, from the pure theoretical point of view (i.e., from the measurement theoretical point of view), that regression analysis can not be justified without Bayes’ theorem. This may imply that even the conventional classification of (Fisher’s) statistics and Bayesian statistics should be reconsidered.
In this paper I propose an interpretation of classical statistical mechanics that centers on taking seriously the idea that probability measures represent complete states of statistical mechanical systems. I show how this leads naturally to the idea that the stochasticity of statistical mechanics is associated directly with the observables of the theory rather than with the microstates (as traditional accounts would have it). The usual assumption that microstates are representationally significant in the theory is therefore dispensable, a consequence which suggests interesting possibilities for developing non-equilibrium statistical mechanics and investigating inter-theoretic answers to the foundational questions of statistical mechanics.
We attempt to contribute some novel points of view to the "foundations of quantum mechanics", using mathematical tools from "quantum probability theory" (such as the theory of operator algebras). We first introduce an abstract algebraic framework for the formulation of mathematical models of physical systems that is general enough to encompass classical and quantum mechanical models. After a short discussion on the properties of classical systems (realism and determinism), we move on to the study of a general class of quantum-mechanical models of physical systems and explain what some of the key problems in a quantum theory of observations and measurements are. In the last part of our essay, we attempt to elucidate the roles played by entanglement between a system and its environment and of information loss in understanding "decoherence" and "dephasing", which are key mechanisms in a quantum theory of measurements and experiments. We also discuss the problem of "time in quantum mechanics" and sketch an answer to the question when an experiment can be considered to have been completed successfully.
The classical ergodic hypothesis has served as a foundational assumption in statistical mechanics for more than a century. However, its core claims---that a physical system explores all accessible microstates over long times, and that time averages equal ensemble averages---are incompatible with the behavior of many real systems, including glasses, biological molecules, and complex non-equilibrium systems. Moreover, the classical formulation lacks a mechanism for information loss, observer dependence, and hierarchical coarse-graining. This paper introduces the \emph{New Ergodic Principle} (NEP), a unified projection framework that integrates (i) unitary time evolution from quantum mechanics, (ii) measurement-induced projection and information loss, and (iii) hierarchical projection from the OS-model, which formalizes observer-dependent coarse-graining. NEP replaces the classical ergodic hypothesis with a three-layer projection structure, yielding a generalized ergodic average:⟨A⟩NEP=Tr ⁣[πk ⁣(∑iPiU(t)ρU†(t)Pi)A].\langle A \rangle_{\mathrm{NEP}}= \mathrm{Tr}\!\left[\pi_k\!\left(\sum_i P_i U(t)\rho U^\dagger(t) P_i\right) A\right].⟨A⟩NEP​=Tr[πk​(∑i​Pi​U(t)ρU†(t)Pi​)A].This formulation naturally incorporates non-ergodic systems, clarifies the origin of irreversibility, and provides a mathematically coherent foundation for equilibrium and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. The NEP framework also suggests a unified mathematical basis for physics grounded in projection theory rather than classical set-theoretic structures.