Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cosmic Research

A Possible Experimental Verification of the Relativistic Slowing Down of a "Traveling Clock" by Using Quantum Frequency and Time Standards

G. I. Rukman, Ya.A. Yukhvidin

Published Jul 1, 1966• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Method of relativistic syntonization of quantum clocks: experimental studies

Vyacheslav F. Fateev, Fedor R. Smirnov, Карауш Артем Андреевич

Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Twin Paradox 1938-2012

J. Bajnok

The simplest version of the clock paradox is the following: A and B are two adjacent atomic clocks at rest (v = 0) in a closed inertial system K. After an acceleration period, the atomic clock A travels with constant velocity va at L distance, then stops and moves contrariwise with constant velocity at L distance before slows it down and stops next to clock B. According to the standard theoretical statement, the clock in motion would run slower, therefore, after returning next to clock B, clock A shows less time elapsed as clock than clock B that remained at rest. This can be described with the frequency changes of the clocks. The frequency of the clock in motion is

•Nov 1, 2012•0 citations

Relativistic Quantum Clocks

Maximilian P. E. Lock, Ivette Fuentes

arXiv:1609.09426•Tutorials, schools, and workshops in the mathematical sciences•Jan 1, 2017•12 citations

Derivation of the Cause of Circumnavigating Atomic Clock Time Difference and Its Experimental Verification Scheme. Based on Wave Function Collapse and Reconstruction

yan li

Abstract In the Hafele-Keating experiment, circumnavigating atomic clocks exhibited a fixed nanosecond-level time difference. For half a century, this phenomenon has been interpreted by mainstream physics academia as direct evidence for the relativistic time dilation effect. Breaking away from the theoretical framework of spacetime distortion, this paper starts from the underlying mechanism of quantum measurement and puts forward the core viewpoint: the essence of atomic clock timing deviation is not the distortion of spacetime itself, but the innate asymmetry of microwave measurement paths. The microwave resonating with cesium atoms must undergo the quantum process of wave function collapse and reconstruction, while the timing microwave does not pass through this process. The physical difference between the two paths leads to timing deviation. Combined with original derivation and experimental design, this paper deduces the formation mechanism of atomic clock time difference based on the quantum properties of wave function collapse and reconstruction. Meanwhile, it proposes a minimalist and implementable atomic clock modification scheme to eliminate time difference by unifying measurement paths. Based on relevant original research achievements [1][2], this paper completes mutual verification between theory and experiment, corroborates that the wave function collapse and reconstruction process is the core cause of atomic clock time difference, and provides a new perspective for research on quantum measurement and time standards.

•May 8, 2026•0 citations

A Multi-Frequency Approach to the Definition of a Frequency Standard Using 176Lu+

K. J. Arnold, R. Kaewuam, Ting Rei Tan +1 more

A definition of a frequency standard that utilizes multiple clock transitions within a single atom is considered. Under experimentally achievable conditions, it is shown that the operating conditions of the system can be constrained by the definition of all available clock frequencies. Systems calibrated to the standard would then provide identical levels of performance, with the exclusion of relativistic effects as these do not influence frequency ratios. This would provide a globally certifiable optical frequency reference. An implementation using three clock transitions in176Lu+is considered.

Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS)•Apr 1, 2019•0 citations

Relativistic Quantum-Speed Limit for Gaussian Systems and Prospective Experimental Verification

Salman Sajad Wani, Aatif Kaisar Khan, Saif Al-Kuwari +1 more

Timing and phase resolution in satellite QKD, kilometre-scale gravitational-wave detectors, and space-borne clock networks hinge on quantum-speed limits (QSLs), yet benchmarks omit relativistic effects for coherent and squeezed probes. We derive first-order relativistic corrections to the Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin bounds. Starting from the Foldy-Wouthuysen expansion and treating $-p^{4}/(8 m^{3} c^{2})$ as a harmonic-oscillator perturbation, we propagate Gaussian states to obtain closed-form QSLs and the quantum Cramér-Rao bound. Relativistic kinematics slow evolution in an amplitude- and squeezing-dependent way, increase both bounds, and introduce an $ε^{2} t^{2}$ phase drift that weakens timing sensitivity while modestly increasing the squeeze factor. A single electron ($ε\approx 1.5\times 10^{-10}$) in a $5.4\,\mathrm{T}$ Penning trap, read out with $149\,\mathrm{GHz}$ quantum-limited balanced homodyne, should reveal this drift within $\sim 15\,\mathrm{min}$ -- within known hold times. These results benchmark relativistic corrections in continuous-variable systems and point to an accessible test of the quantum speed limit in high-velocity or strong-field regimes.

quant-pharXiv:2511.20707•Physics Letters A•Nov 26, 2025•1 citation
The simplest version of the clock paradox is the following: A and B are two adjacent atomic clocks at rest (v = 0) in a closed inertial system K. After an acceleration period, the atomic clock A travels with constant velocity va at L distance, then stops and moves contrariwise with constant velocity at L distance before slows it down and stops next to clock B. According to the standard theoretical statement, the clock in motion would run slower, therefore, after returning next to clock B, clock A shows less time elapsed as clock than clock B that remained at rest. This can be described with the frequency changes of the clocks. The frequency of the clock in motion is
Abstract In the Hafele-Keating experiment, circumnavigating atomic clocks exhibited a fixed nanosecond-level time difference. For half a century, this phenomenon has been interpreted by mainstream physics academia as direct evidence for the relativistic time dilation effect. Breaking away from the theoretical framework of spacetime distortion, this paper starts from the underlying mechanism of quantum measurement and puts forward the core viewpoint: the essence of atomic clock timing deviation is not the distortion of spacetime itself, but the innate asymmetry of microwave measurement paths. The microwave resonating with cesium atoms must undergo the quantum process of wave function collapse and reconstruction, while the timing microwave does not pass through this process. The physical difference between the two paths leads to timing deviation. Combined with original derivation and experimental design, this paper deduces the formation mechanism of atomic clock time difference based on the quantum properties of wave function collapse and reconstruction. Meanwhile, it proposes a minimalist and implementable atomic clock modification scheme to eliminate time difference by unifying measurement paths. Based on relevant original research achievements [1][2], this paper completes mutual verification between theory and experiment, corroborates that the wave function collapse and reconstruction process is the core cause of atomic clock time difference, and provides a new perspective for research on quantum measurement and time standards.
A definition of a frequency standard that utilizes multiple clock transitions within a single atom is considered. Under experimentally achievable conditions, it is shown that the operating conditions of the system can be constrained by the definition of all available clock frequencies. Systems calibrated to the standard would then provide identical levels of performance, with the exclusion of relativistic effects as these do not influence frequency ratios. This would provide a globally certifiable optical frequency reference. An implementation using three clock transitions in176Lu+is considered.
Timing and phase resolution in satellite QKD, kilometre-scale gravitational-wave detectors, and space-borne clock networks hinge on quantum-speed limits (QSLs), yet benchmarks omit relativistic effects for coherent and squeezed probes. We derive first-order relativistic corrections to the Mandelstam-Tamm and Margolus-Levitin bounds. Starting from the Foldy-Wouthuysen expansion and treating −p4/(8m3c2)-p^{4}/(8 m^{3} c^{2})−p4/(8m3c2) as a harmonic-oscillator perturbation, we propagate Gaussian states to obtain closed-form QSLs and the quantum Cramér-Rao bound. Relativistic kinematics slow evolution in an amplitude- and squeezing-dependent way, increase both bounds, and introduce an ε2t2ε^{2} t^{2}ε2t2 phase drift that weakens timing sensitivity while modestly increasing the squeeze factor. A single electron (ε≈1.5×10−10ε\approx 1.5\times 10^{-10}ε≈1.5×10−10) in a 5.4 T5.4\,\mathrm{T}5.4T Penning trap, read out with 149 GHz149\,\mathrm{GHz}149GHz quantum-limited balanced homodyne, should reveal this drift within ∼15 min\sim 15\,\mathrm{min}∼15min -- within known hold times. These results benchmark relativistic corrections in continuous-variable systems and point to an accessible test of the quantum speed limit in high-velocity or strong-field regimes.