Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Magnetic Interactions in the Hubbard Model.

P. M. Mihas

Published Jan 1, 1977• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Magnetic properties of the hubbard model with strong interaction

V. Ya. Krivnov, Alexander A. Ovchinnikov, Vladyslav O. Cheranovskii

Synthetic Metals•Jun 1, 1991•1 citation

Magnetic properties of the hubbard model with infinite interactions

V. Ya. Krivnov, Alexander A. Ovchinnikov, Vladyslav O. Cheranovskii

Synthetic Metals•Nov 1, 1989•25 citations

Magnetic Properties of the Hubbard Model with Infinite Interactions

V. Ya. Krivnov, Alexander A. Ovchinnikov, Vladyslav O. Cheranovskii

Research reports in physics•Jan 1, 1991•14 citations

Effect of interactions, disorder and magnetic field in the Hubbard model in two dimensions

Nandini Trivedi, P. J. H. Denteneer, Dariush Heidarian +1 more

Pramana•Jun 1, 2005•6 citations

Magnetic couplings in the hubbard model

Eleftherios N. Economou, P. M. Mihas

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations

Magnetism and superconductivity within extended Hubbard model for a dimer. Exact results

B. Grabiec, S. Krawiec, M. Matlak

We find the eigenvalues $E_α $ and eigenvectors $|E_α>$ of the extended Hubbard dimer and we represent each part $E_α |E_α> < E_α |$ of the dimer Hamiltonian $(α=1,2,...,16)$in the second quantizations with the use of the Hubbard and spin operators. This procedure gives a review of all competitive, intrinsic interactions, deeply hidden in the orginal form of the considered Hamiltonian. Among competitive interactions we can find ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions (also in the form appearing in the $t-J$ model), hopping of the Cooper pairs between different dimer lattice sites (similar as in Kulik-Pedan, Penson-Kolb models), as well as, intersite Cooper pair interactions. We plot several coupling constants of these interactions vs Coulomb intrasite interaction $U$ to show that the competition between them strongly depends on the model parameters. The thermodynamical activity of each particular interaction, belonging to a given energy level, depends, however, on the occupation of this level. From the presented review of interactions it is evident that the extended Hubbard model is capable to describe the properties of superconductors with magnetic ordering (including also high-$T_C$ superconductors) where a strong competition between magnetism and superconductivity takes place.

arXiv:cond-mat/0511329•Nov 14, 2005•2 citations
We find the eigenvalues $E_α $ and eigenvectors ∣Eα>|E_α>∣Eα​> of the extended Hubbard dimer and we represent each part Eα∣Eα><Eα∣E_α |E_α> < E_α |Eα​∣Eα​><Eα​∣ of the dimer Hamiltonian (α=1,2,...,16)(α=1,2,...,16)(α=1,2,...,16)in the second quantizations with the use of the Hubbard and spin operators. This procedure gives a review of all competitive, intrinsic interactions, deeply hidden in the orginal form of the considered Hamiltonian. Among competitive interactions we can find ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions (also in the form appearing in the t−Jt-Jt−J model), hopping of the Cooper pairs between different dimer lattice sites (similar as in Kulik-Pedan, Penson-Kolb models), as well as, intersite Cooper pair interactions. We plot several coupling constants of these interactions vs Coulomb intrasite interaction UUU to show that the competition between them strongly depends on the model parameters. The thermodynamical activity of each particular interaction, belonging to a given energy level, depends, however, on the occupation of this level. From the presented review of interactions it is evident that the extended Hubbard model is capable to describe the properties of superconductors with magnetic ordering (including also high-TCT_CTC​ superconductors) where a strong competition between magnetism and superconductivity takes place.