This chapter discusses in some detail the connection between the classical and quantum mechanical equations of motion, largely using examples that are solvable. It recounts how the old quantum theory was formulated by quantizing the action. Choosing irreducible cycles around the tori leads naturally to defining the action and angle variables of motion, and the quantization of action around each cycle. The chapter shows that families of these periodic orbits contribute to the oscillating part of the density of states of an integrable system in the form of a trace formula. It discusses the transition from integrability to chaos in such systems when perturbations are added that couple resonantly to these natural frequencies. The chapter elaborates with a view to develop the semiclassical approximation, and the associated quantization condition. It brings out the similarity between the Schrodinger equation of wave mechanics, and the HJ equation.
This chapter discusses in some detail the connection between the classical and quantum mechanical equations of motion, largely using examples that are solvable. It recounts how the old quantum theory was formulated by quantizing the action. Choosing irreducible cycles around the tori leads naturally to defining the action and angle variables of motion, and the quantization of action around each cycle. The chapter shows that families of these periodic orbits contribute to the oscillating part of the density of states of an integrable system in the form of a trace formula. It discusses the transition from integrability to chaos in such systems when perturbations are added that couple resonantly to these natural frequencies. The chapter elaborates with a view to develop the semiclassical approximation, and the associated quantization condition. It brings out the similarity between the Schrodinger equation of wave mechanics, and the HJ equation.
Einstein (1917) appreciated early on that within the “old” pre-1925/26 quantum mechanics absence of integrability is a serious obstacle for the quantization of classical systems. Therefore, in retrospect not surprisingly, the quantization problem was not adequately solved until the advent of the “new” quantum mechanics by Heisenberg, Born, Jordan and Schrödinger. The new quantum mechanics did not rely at all on the notion of classical paths, and this way, unwittingly, sidestepped the chaos problem. Within the framework of the new theory, any classical system can be quantized, including classically chaotic systems. But while the quantization of integrable systems is straightforward, the quantization of classically chaotic systems, even today, presents a formidable technical challenge. This is especially true for quantization in the semiclassical regime, where the quantum numbers involved are large. In fact, efficient semiclassical quantization rules for chaotic systems were not known until Gutzwiller (1971, 1990) intoduced periodic orbit expansions. Gutzwiller's method is discussed in Section 4.1.3 below. It is important to emphasize here that the existence of chaos in certain classical systems in no way introduces conceptual problems into the framework of modern quantum theory, although, let it be emphasized again, chaos came back with a vengeance from the “old” days of quantum mechanics. Even given all the modern day computer power accessible to the “practitioner” of quantum mechanics, chaos is the ultimate reason for the slow progress in the numerical computation of even moderately excited states in such important, but chaotic problems as the helium atom.
The exact and semiclassical quantum mechanics of the elliptic billiard is investigated. The classical system is integrable and exhibits a separatrix, dividing the phase space into regions of oscillatory and rotational motion. The classical separability carries over to quantum mechanics, and the Schrödinger equation is shown to be equivalent to the spheroidal wave equation. The quantum eigenvalues show a clear pattern when transformed into the classical action space. The implication of the separatrix on the wave functions is illustrated. A uniform WKB quantization taking into account complex orbits is shown to be adequate for the semiclassical quantization in the presence of a separatrix. The pattern of states in classical action space is nicely explained by this quantization procedure. We extract an effective Maslov phase varying smoothly on the energy surface, which is used to modify the Berry-Tabor trace formula, resulting in a summation over non-periodic orbits. This modified trace formula produces the correct number of states, even close to the separatrix. The Fourier transform of the density of states is explained in terms of classical orbits, and the The semiclassical quantization of a Hamiltonian system is deeply connected to the structure of its phase space. The generic Hamiltonian system contains a complicated mixture of near-integrable and
The problem of semiclassical quantization of nonseparable systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom is studied within the framework of Heisenberg matrix mechanics, in extension of previous work on one-dimensional systems. The relationship between the quantum theory and multiply-periodic classical motions is derived anew. A suitably averaged Lagrangian provides a variational basis not only for the Fourier components of the semiclassical equations of motion, but also for the general definition of action variables. A Legendre transformation to the Hamiltonian verifies that these have been properly chosen and therefore provide a basis for the quantization of nonseparable systems. The problem of connection formulas is discussed by a method integral to the present approach. The action variables are shown to be adiabatic invariants of the classical system. An elementary application of the method is given. The methods of this paper are applicable to nondegenerate systems only.
The classical-quantum correspondence is developed in its most natural setting, i.e., that of phase space distributions. Specifically, the Wigner–Weyl representation of the two fundamental quantum densities ‖n≳<n‖ and ‖n≳<m‖, which are eigenstates of the quantum Liouville operator, are shown, for integrable systems, to yield stationary and nonstationary classical Liouville eigenstates in the ℏ→0 limit. The former are uniform distributions on semiclassically quantized tori, whereas the latter are nonuniform distributions on similar tori at intermediate actions. Applications to semiclassical mechanics in action-angle variable, the Heisenberg correspondence for matrix elements and the computation of vibrational intensities are provided.
Quantum mechanics can be formulated either in terms of matrix mechanics or in terms of wave mechanics. This chapter centers on a discussion of the historical origins, mathematical structure, and extension to non-Hermitian quantum theory of matrix mechanics. The development of atomic discrete spectra and the old quantum theory showed that classical mechanics could not account for the discreteness of atomic energy levels and spectral lines, which motivated Heisenberg, Born, Jordan, and others to establish matrix mechanics centered on noncommuting physical quantities. Combining the Bohr atomic model, angular momentum quantization, and radiative transitions, one can see how matrix mechanics describes the energy level structure and quantum transitions of atomic systems, and how the Heisenberg equation of motion gives the fundamental form of quantum dynamics. The example of the harmonic oscillator further shows that the discreteness of the energy spectrum can be obtained directly from the matrix method, thereby establishing a clear connection among transition frequencies, matrix elements, and radiation-induced transitions. The matrix representation corresponds to the operator theory in Hilbert space, where state vectors, inner products, complete bases, and spectral decomposition constitute the fundamental mathematical framework of quantum mechanics. For closed quantum systems, physical observables are generally required to be represented by Hermitian or self-adjoint operators, so as to ensure that their eigenvalues possess the physically acceptable property of being real numbers. The Hermiticity of an operator is also closely related to its domain and boundary conditions, which provides a mathematical possibility for the emergence of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Based on these discussions, this chapter further explains how non-Hermitian dynamics is connected with open systems, dissipative processes, and special boundary conditions, thereby demonstrating the natural connection between traditional matrix mechanics and modern non-Hermitian quantum theory.