Cambridge University Press eBooks

Stochastic processes in quantum mechanical settings

Ronald F. Fox

Published Apr 6, 1989• 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction The apparent generality of the title to this chapter is appropriately reduced by sufficiently precisely defining the terms used. We have in mind the natural extension to quantum mechanical settings of the ideas usually covered in a discussion of stochastic processes in classical mechanical settings. In classical mechanical settings, the fundamental process is Brownian motion, which describes the influence of external fluctuating forces on a small particle. The mathematical apparatus developed for the study of Brownian motion has been generalized and applied to irreversible thermodynamics (Onsager and Machlup, 1953), fluctuating hydrodynamics (Fox and Uhlenbeck, 1970), light scattering from fluids and mixtures (Berne and Pecora, 1976) and chemical reactions (McQuarrie and Keizer, 1981). In each case, the stochastic process involves fluctuations generated by thermal motions. We are not considering the stochastic trajectories (chaos) of classically deterministic motion in non-linear systems (Lichtenberg and Lieberman, 1983), which is an entirely separate context for stochastic processes. Our goal in this chapter is to study the effects of thermal fluctuations in quantum mechanical settings. Therefore, we exclude a discussion of interpreting quantum mechanics as a classical stochastic motion (Nelson, 1966), an idea which should have been put to rest by Grabert, Hänggi and Talkner (1979). We also exclude a discussion of quantum chaos, which is currently a very active area of research (Zaslavsky, 1981). Just as Brownian motion provides the paradigm for stochastic processes in classical mechanical settings, the Anderson–Kubo oscillator (Anderson, 1954; Kubo, 1954; Kubo, Toda and Nashitsume, 1985) is the paradigm for stochastic processes in quantum mechanical settings.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511897825.003

Related papers

A stochastic approach to open quantum systems

Robert Biele, Roberto D’Agosta

Stochastic methods are ubiquitous to a variety of fields, ranging from physics to economics and mathematics. In many cases, in the investigation of natural processes, stochasticity arises every time one considers the dynamics of a system in contact with a somewhat bigger system, an environment with which it is considered in thermal equilibrium. Any small fluctuation of the environment has some random effect on the system. In physics, stochastic methods have been applied to the investigation of phase transitions, thermal and electrical noise, thermal relaxation, quantum information, Brownian motion and so on. In this review, we will focus on the so-called stochastic Schrödinger equation. This is useful as a starting point to investigate the dynamics of open quantum systems capable of exchanging energy and momentum with an external environment. We discuss in some detail the general derivation of a stochastic Schrödinger equation and some of its recent applications to spin thermal transport, thermal relaxation, and Bose-Einstein condensation. We thoroughly discuss the advantages of this formalism with respect to the more common approach in terms of the reduced density matrix. The applications discussed here constitute only a few examples of a much wider range of applicability.

arXiv:1112.2694Journal of Physics Condensed MatterJun 20, 201256 citations

Lagrangian dynamics for classical, Brownian, and quantum mechanical particles

Michele Pavon

In the framework of Nelson’s stochastic mechanics [E. Nelson, Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion (Princeton University, Princeton, 1967); F. Guerra, Phys. Rep. 77, 263 (1981); E. Nelson, Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University, Princeton, 1985)] we seek to develop the particle counterpart of the hydrodynamic results of M. Pavon [J. Math. Phys. 36, 6774 (1995); Phys. Lett. A 209, 143 (1995)]. In particular, a first form of Hamilton’s principle is established. We show that this variational principle leads to the correct equations of motion for the classical particle, the Brownian particle in thermodynamical equilibrium, and the quantum particle. In the latter case, the critical process q satisfies a stochastic Newton law. We then introduce the momentum process p, and show that the pair (q,p) satisfies canonical-like equations.

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJul 1, 199614 citations

Stochastic histories

Robert B. Griffiths

Introduction Despite the fact that classical mechanics employs deterministic dynamical laws, random dynamical processes often arise in classical physics, as well as in everyday life. A stochastic or random process is one in which states-of-affairs at successive times are not related to one another by deterministic laws, and instead probability theory is employed to describe whatever regularities exist. Tossing a coin or rolling a die several times in succession are examples of stochastic processes in which the previous history is of very little help in predicting what will happen in the future. The motion of a baseball is an example of a stochastic process which is to some degree predictable using classical equations of motion that relate its acceleration to the total force acting upon it. However, a lack of information about its initial state (e.g., whether it is spinning), its precise shape, and the condition and motion of the air through which it moves limits the precision with which one can predict its trajectory. The Brownian motion of a small particle suspended in a fluid and subject to random bombardment by the surrounding molecules of fluid is a well-studied example of a stochastic process in classical physics. Whereas the instantaneous velocity of the particle is hard to predict, there is a probabilistic correlation between successive positions, which can be predicted using stochastic dynamics and checked by experimental measurements. In particular, given the particle's position at a time t , it is possible to compute the probability that it will have moved a certain distance by the time t + Δ t .

Cambridge University Press eBooksNov 29, 20010 citations

Brownian Motion and Quantum Mechanics

Roumen Tsekov

A theoretical parallel between the classical Brownian motion and quantum mechanics is explored via two stochastic sources. It is shown that, in contrast to the classical Langevin force, quantum mechanics is driven by turbulent velocity fluctuations with diffusive behavior. In the case of simultaneous action of the thermal and quantum noises, the quantum Brownian motion is described as well.

arXiv:1902.05930Fluctuation and Noise LettersNov 19, 20196 citations

Nonequilibrium Quantum Systems: Fluctuations and Interactions

Yiğit Subaşı

We explore some aspects of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics of classical and quantum systems. Two chapters are devoted to fluctuation theorems which were originally derived for classical systems. The main challenge in formulating them in quantum mechanics is the fact that fundamental quantities of interest, like work, are defined via the classical concept of a phase space trajectory. We utilize the decoherent histories conceptual framework, in which classical trajectories emerge in quantum mechanics as a result of coarse graining, and provide a first-principles analysis of the nonequilibrium work relation of Jarzynski and Crooks's fluctuation theorem for a quantum system interacting with a general environment based on the quantum Brownian motion (QBM) model. We indicate a parameter range at low temperatures where the theorems might fail in their original form. Fluctuation theorems of Jarzynski and Crooks for systems obeying classical Hamiltonian dynamics are derived under the assumption that the initial conditions are sampled from a canonical ensemble, even though the equilibrium state of an isolated system is typically associated with the microcanonical ensemble. We address this issue through an exact analysis of the classical Brownian motion model. We argue that a stronger form of ensemble equivalence than usually discussed in equilibrium statistical mechanics is required for these theorems to hold in the infinite environment limit irrespective of the ensemble used, and proceed to prove it for this model. An exact expression for the probability distribution of work is obtained for finite environments. Intuitively one expects a system to relax to an equilibrium state when brought into contact with a thermal environment. Yet it is important to have rigorous results that provide conditions for equilibration and characterize the equilibrium state. We consider the dynamics of open quantum systems using the Langevin and master equations and rigorously show that under fairly general conditions quantum systems interacting with a heat bath relax to the equilibrium state defined as the reduced thermal state of the system plus environment, even in the strong coupling regime. Our proof is valid to second-order in interaction strength for general systems and exact for the linear QBM model, for which we also show the equivalence of multi-time correlations. In the final chapter we give a sampling of our investigations into macroscopic quantum phenomena. We work out in detail a specific example of how and under what conditions the center of mass (CoM) coordinate of a macroscopic object emerges as the relevant degree of freedom. Interaction patterns are studied in terms of the couplings they induce between the CoM and relative coordinates of two macroscopic objects. We discuss the implications of these interaction patterns on macroscopic entanglement.

Jan 1, 20130 citations

Stochastic systems

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

A quantum entity is intrinsically indeterminate and is not in a determinate (classical) state when it is not being observed. The quantum entity is found to be in a determinate state only if an experiment is carried out to observe it, as discussed in Baaquie (2013e). The indeterminate behavior of the quantum entity is described by the formalism of quantum mathematics discussed in Chapter 2. The measure of quantum indeterminacy and uncertainty is Planck's constant ħ. Randomness also exists in classical systems; however, a classical system's randomness is in principle different from quantum indeterminacy, since a priori, a classical random system is intrinsically in a determinate state. Classical randomness arises entirely due to our lack of complete knowledge of the determinate state. The theory of classical probability describes a classical system about which one has incomplete knowledge. There are many ways of introducing randomness in a classical system, depending on its nature. A classical random system in thermal equilibrium is described by statistical mechanics. A classical system undergoing random time evolution can be described by taking the classical equations of motion and adding a random force to it. The evolution of the classical particle is then described by a stochastic process. The random force is usually represented by Gaussian white noise. Classical random processes driven by white noise, such as those that arise in finance and other areas, form a wide class of problems that can be described by classical probability theory. It is shown in this chapter that the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics, and in particular, the Hamiltonian operator and path integrals, provide an appropriate mathematical formalism for describing processes that are driven by Gaussian white noise.

Cambridge University Press eBooksMar 27, 20141 citation