Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy

When the Scientist turns Philosopher

Friedel Weinert

Published Jan 1, 1998• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper examines how such fundamental notions as causality and determinism have undergone changes as a direct result of empirical discoveries. Although such notions are often regarded as metaphysical or a priori concepts, experimental discoveries at the beginning of this century—radioactive decay, blackbody radiation and spontaneous emission—led to a direct questioning of the notions of causality and determinism. Experimental evidence suggests that these two notions must be separated. Causality and indeterminism are compatible with the behavior of quantum-mechanical systems. The argument also sheds some light on the Duhem-Quine thesis, since experimental results at the periphery of the conceptual scheme directly affect conceptions at the very core.

DOI
10.5840/wcp20-paideia199837692

Related papers

Causality and determinism

Marij van Strien

In the 19th century, determinism was often seen as a presupposition of scientific thinking, although its validity was not universally accepted among scientists and philosophers. There were different conceptions of causality, and the concept of cause was often linked to that of force or energy; but toward the end of the 19th century, the causal conception of forces was increasingly criticised and some argued that the concept of cause should be abandoned altogether. After the development of the modern theory of quantum mechanics in 1925, many physicists and philosophers claimed that this theory implied an overthrow of the classical conception of causality; however, only few authors abandoned causality altogether. The debate of the implications of quantum mechanics for causality soon became muddled because of the many different meanings attached to the term “causality”.

Routledge eBooks•Dec 16, 2025•0 citations

The road to quantum mechanics

James T. Cushing

The theory of relativity is essentially the culmination of classical physics. Although revisions in our concepts of space and time are necessitated by both the special and general theories of relativity, the notion of causality, in which a cause precedes its effect, remains intact in the relativistic formulations of electrodynamics and mechanics and of gravitation. An upper limit is set on the speed of bodies, and of the propagation of energy, and physical quantities are often defined operationally, but once we adjust ourselves to these new rules, our representations of physical processes proceed pretty much as they did in classical physics. On the other hand, quantum theory seems to require a much more profound philosophical revision of our thought patterns. Even the viability of the usual meaning of a causal connection between one event and another is there called into question. SOME HISTORICAL BACKGROUND We begin with a brief and highly selective review of the experimental and theoretical problems that formed the conceptual backdrop to the emergence of quantum theory. We focus attention first on an important phenomenon – blackbody radiation – that was instrumental for the formulation of quantum mechanics. A blackbody is defined as a surface that absorbs all of the electromagnetic radiation that falls onto it. It is picturesquely so named since any light incident on such a body would be absorbed, making it appear black (at least at typical temperatures in our environment). A blackbody also emits radiation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 29, 1998•0 citations

The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science

Mario Bunge

Causalism is the traditional attitude of disowning all noncausal categories of determination, holding dogmatically that every connection in the world is causal. The entirely negative attitude taken by indeterminism and by empiricism toward the principle of causation is inconsistent with the very goal of science, which is the search for the objective forms of determination and interconnection. This chapter deals with the question concerning the range of validity of the causal principle. The notion of causal range of the laws of nature will be clarified and illustrated, by analyzing in some detail a typical physical law with which every student of electricity is familiar. Science seems to show neither an enlargement nor a progressive shrinking of the domain of validity of the causal principle. Most scientists and philosophers of science believed that quantum mechanics had given causality the death blow, by showing that quantum phenomena are inherently random, hence only statistically predictable.

Routledge eBooks•Jul 5, 2017•30 citations

Heisenberg and the Problem of Causality

Manuel Cruz Ortiz de Landázuri

The discovery of quantum physics opened a broad debate on the epistemological status of the principle of causality. In this article, I analyze the problem of causality in Heisenberg by distinguishing two levels of philosophical explanation in his thought. As a philosopher of science, his understanding of causality is closely linked to Moritz Schlick, although he will later adopt a neo-Kantian view of the a priori. As a philosopher of nature, Heisenberg recovers the notion of potency to understand the wave function. My thesis is that this notion of potency could have allowed him to elaborate a realistic and nondeterministic theory of causality, but the identification of causality and determinism (in Schlick’s line) did not lead him to such a conclusion.

HOPOS The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science•Dec 16, 2024•0 citations

Causalità e realtà nel dibattito sulla meccanica quantistica degli anni '30 del novecento. Una possibile ricostruzione

Renato Pettoello

As with any scientific revolution, quantum mechanics entailed a profound revision of our fundamental epistemological concepts and also of our worldview as a whole. This was the case for the concepts of causality and reality. Around these concepts, there arose in the third decade of the last century a heated debate in which almost all the scientists and philosophers of the time took part and which in a certain sense is still going on today. The Author provides a reconstruction of the various different positions, from the conservative attempt to defend determinism to the most radical stochastic positions, and singles out in Ernst Cassirer’s solution the most convincing approach.

RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA•Feb 1, 2014•2 citations

From the Light Quantum to the Photon: The Evolution of a Physical Concept

Aaron Collavini, Valentina Bologna, Francesco Longo +2 more

This work examines the physical and conceptual evolution of the light quantum from Planck's blackbody theory to the theoretical and experimental developments that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field. The present study shows that the decisive transition occurred in Einstein's quantum theory of radiation (1916-1917). Absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission were formulated as elementary probabilistic mechanisms whose statistical balance alone reproduces the blackbody spectrum. In particular, spontaneous emission requires the emission of a light quantum, thereby implicitly proving its physical necessity before its theoretical status was clarified. At the same time, the already existing term photon began to acquire a stable usage following Lewis's 1926 proposal and became increasingly associated with Einstein's light quantum. By the mid-1920s, the central problem had shifted from whether light quanta were physically required to how radiation could be incorporated into the emerging quantum-mechanical formalism. This transition marks a key stage, illustrating how initial debates about the existence of light quanta gave way to their integration into a comprehensive theoretical structure. The resulting asymmetry between the novel quantum description of matter and the still-classical description of radiation, called into question by the phenomenon of spontaneous emission, identifies the physical problem that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2609.04985•Sep 7, 2026
This paper examines how such fundamental notions as causality and determinism have undergone changes as a direct result of empirical discoveries. Although such notions are often regarded as metaphysical or a priori concepts, experimental discoveries at the beginning of this century—radioactive decay, blackbody radiation and spontaneous emission—led to a direct questioning of the notions of causality and determinism. Experimental evidence suggests that these two notions must be separated. Causality and indeterminism are compatible with the behavior of quantum-mechanical systems. The argument also sheds some light on the Duhem-Quine thesis, since experimental results at the periphery of the conceptual scheme directly affect conceptions at the very core.
In the 19th century, determinism was often seen as a presupposition of scientific thinking, although its validity was not universally accepted among scientists and philosophers. There were different conceptions of causality, and the concept of cause was often linked to that of force or energy; but toward the end of the 19th century, the causal conception of forces was increasingly criticised and some argued that the concept of cause should be abandoned altogether. After the development of the modern theory of quantum mechanics in 1925, many physicists and philosophers claimed that this theory implied an overthrow of the classical conception of causality; however, only few authors abandoned causality altogether. The debate of the implications of quantum mechanics for causality soon became muddled because of the many different meanings attached to the term “causality”.
The theory of relativity is essentially the culmination of classical physics. Although revisions in our concepts of space and time are necessitated by both the special and general theories of relativity, the notion of causality, in which a cause precedes its effect, remains intact in the relativistic formulations of electrodynamics and mechanics and of gravitation. An upper limit is set on the speed of bodies, and of the propagation of energy, and physical quantities are often defined operationally, but once we adjust ourselves to these new rules, our representations of physical processes proceed pretty much as they did in classical physics. On the other hand, quantum theory seems to require a much more profound philosophical revision of our thought patterns. Even the viability of the usual meaning of a causal connection between one event and another is there called into question. SOME HISTORICAL BACKGROUND We begin with a brief and highly selective review of the experimental and theoretical problems that formed the conceptual backdrop to the emergence of quantum theory. We focus attention first on an important phenomenon – blackbody radiation – that was instrumental for the formulation of quantum mechanics. A blackbody is defined as a surface that absorbs all of the electromagnetic radiation that falls onto it. It is picturesquely so named since any light incident on such a body would be absorbed, making it appear black (at least at typical temperatures in our environment). A blackbody also emits radiation.
Causalism is the traditional attitude of disowning all noncausal categories of determination, holding dogmatically that every connection in the world is causal. The entirely negative attitude taken by indeterminism and by empiricism toward the principle of causation is inconsistent with the very goal of science, which is the search for the objective forms of determination and interconnection. This chapter deals with the question concerning the range of validity of the causal principle. The notion of causal range of the laws of nature will be clarified and illustrated, by analyzing in some detail a typical physical law with which every student of electricity is familiar. Science seems to show neither an enlargement nor a progressive shrinking of the domain of validity of the causal principle. Most scientists and philosophers of science believed that quantum mechanics had given causality the death blow, by showing that quantum phenomena are inherently random, hence only statistically predictable.
The discovery of quantum physics opened a broad debate on the epistemological status of the principle of causality. In this article, I analyze the problem of causality in Heisenberg by distinguishing two levels of philosophical explanation in his thought. As a philosopher of science, his understanding of causality is closely linked to Moritz Schlick, although he will later adopt a neo-Kantian view of the a priori. As a philosopher of nature, Heisenberg recovers the notion of potency to understand the wave function. My thesis is that this notion of potency could have allowed him to elaborate a realistic and nondeterministic theory of causality, but the identification of causality and determinism (in Schlick’s line) did not lead him to such a conclusion.
As with any scientific revolution, quantum mechanics entailed a profound revision of our fundamental epistemological concepts and also of our worldview as a whole. This was the case for the concepts of causality and reality. Around these concepts, there arose in the third decade of the last century a heated debate in which almost all the scientists and philosophers of the time took part and which in a certain sense is still going on today. The Author provides a reconstruction of the various different positions, from the conservative attempt to defend determinism to the most radical stochastic positions, and singles out in Ernst Cassirer’s solution the most convincing approach.
This work examines the physical and conceptual evolution of the light quantum from Planck's blackbody theory to the theoretical and experimental developments that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field. The present study shows that the decisive transition occurred in Einstein's quantum theory of radiation (1916-1917). Absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission were formulated as elementary probabilistic mechanisms whose statistical balance alone reproduces the blackbody spectrum. In particular, spontaneous emission requires the emission of a light quantum, thereby implicitly proving its physical necessity before its theoretical status was clarified. At the same time, the already existing term photon began to acquire a stable usage following Lewis's 1926 proposal and became increasingly associated with Einstein's light quantum. By the mid-1920s, the central problem had shifted from whether light quanta were physically required to how radiation could be incorporated into the emerging quantum-mechanical formalism. This transition marks a key stage, illustrating how initial debates about the existence of light quanta gave way to their integration into a comprehensive theoretical structure. The resulting asymmetry between the novel quantum description of matter and the still-classical description of radiation, called into question by the phenomenon of spontaneous emission, identifies the physical problem that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field.