The Observer Effects on Observation Results (SR Tells)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous

Published Nov 1, 2019• 0 citations

Abstract

Paper Hypothesis (No. 1) Observer Effects On Observational Results 1st Hypothesis Explanation If a particle (with length L0) moves by speed of light (approximately), this particle may suffer from length contraction effect and be seen with a contracted length (L1) Then What's happened For Particle Own Nature? theory states The Proper Length L0 Never Change! We have 2 directions to choose from: (1st) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is seen by us as a wrong vision (as mirage) but the particle length itself has no real change Or (2nd) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature changes with this motion – and by such way – the particle nature should be created relative to speed of light! I choose the 2nd choice- Why? Because – the 1st choice tells us that – particle own nature is defined clearly when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle – that means – I'm Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror So the particle nature is created relative to speed of light! Is it true? NOT human mind realization process depends on speed of light – and that explains how the observer effects on observational results… Paper Hypothesis (No. 2) Human Mind Realization Process depends On And uses Speed Of Light - Paper Hypothesis (No. 3) Human Mind Realization process (Using Speed Of Light) effects on the universe around.

Related papers

Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity

Gerges Francis Tawdrous

Research Main Conclusion: The Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity This conclusion is produced by the Following Questions Analysis: Special Theory Of Relativity Tells Us If a particle moves by high velocity (Approximately) relative to an observer – the observer will see relativistic effects effected on this particle – (The relativistic effects are Length Contraction - Time Dilation - Mass Increase) The Questions 1-Are These Relativistic Effects Occurred For The Particle Nature Or For Our Vision Only? (to see something wrong as in the mirage) 2-If these effects are occurred for the Particle Nature – Why the Particle Nature Changes As Result Of The Light Velocity Motion? 3-Is The Particle Nature A Real Nature Or Found Because Of The Observer Effect On This Particle? This Paper discusses these questions and The Conclusion Proves which are: 1-The Relativistic Effects Analysis 2-A Quantized Experiment 3-The Solar Planet Moves According To A Physical Law (and Not in Chaos) 4-The Moon Angular Diameter 5-The Human Body Contains Electromagnetic Waves This paper contains 2 points only – Point No.2 (Research Methodology) and Point No. 3 (Research Conclusion Proves) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

May 1, 20190 citations

Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature

Gerges Francis Tawdrous

Empirical Data An Electron Or Subatomic Particle Behaves As A Particle And Not A Wave When It's Observed! Why? Because The Human Mind Realization Process Depends On (And Uses) The Light Velocity (0.3mkm/Sec) How Does The Observer Effect On The Observed Particle Nature? By Light Beam Produced By The Observer Mind Realization Process. Paper Idea Summary This paper tells a clear claim – that – Because our minds realization process depends on and uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) in the human thinking process that causes the light velocity to be a contributor factor of every thing around us – simply – We See The Universe Through The Light Velocity Effect On Our Vision- That easily explains the equation E=mc2 – why any Mass Energy is defined relative to the light velocity?! Because the light velocity is found in our minds- that explains Why light velocity is constant in all frames Now Because our minds uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec), that enable our minds to produce light beams by the thinking process – this produced light beam can effect on any particle nature as the sun rays effect on all particles – This is the idea shortly– let's ask……Is this idea truth? This paper tries to prove… Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Jan 1, 20200 citations

Light and the observer: new experiments and a critique of our common beliefs about light

C. S. Unnikrishnan

The origin and elaboration of our fundamental theories like quantum theory, the theory of relativity and the quantum field theories can be traced to the study of light and its properties. While developing these theories, several notions on the behaviour of light have been hypothesized as well as asserted, sometimes without any direct or compelling empirical evidence. In the context of quantum physics, there is a widespread belief that experiments on quantum correlations establish nonlocality as an essential aspect of nature. Another unshakable belief without direct empirical support is the absolute constancy of the speed of light relative to moving observers. In this paper, I argue that no experiment on quantum correlations of spatially separated photons necessitates the concept of nonlocality, and that there is no direct empirical proof of nonlocality. I also comment on the need to modify established notions on quantum light, in the context of a clear conflict between cosmology and the zero point energy of quantum electrodynamics. Then I describe the first experiments on the measurement of the true one-way speed light relative to a reference platform that is in inertial motion. The results are at variance with the belief that the speed of light is independent of the velocity of the observer.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIEAug 26, 20071 citation

Relativistic time dilation from a quantum mechanism

Esteban Martínez-Vargas

One of the concepts of Relativity theory that challenges conventional intuition the most is time dilation and length contraction. Usual approaches for describing relativistic effects in quantum systems merely postulate the consequences of these effects as physical constraints. Here, we propose to rebuild Special Relativity from quantum mechanical considerations. This is done by dropping one of its fundamental postulates: the universality of the speed of light. Lorentz transformations are obtained by a quantum mechanism. We use the fact that quantum states depend on the Galilean reference frame where they are defined. In other words, quantum states outside an observer's Galilean reference frame are distorted. Then, we show in a theorem the existence of time-dependent observables that are sensible to this distortion in such a way that their expectation value is a Lorentz-covariant function of time. We then postulate this mechanism as the source of the phenomena of Special Relativity. As a corollary of the main theorem, we show the existence of a Lorentz covariant momentum and mass operators which yield the relativistic momentum and mass. In this theory, the fundamental limit of the speed of light imposes a transparency condition for faster-than-light particles: they are allowed but they are not observable. The transparency effect could explain dark matter in a more general theory following this quantum formalism.

arXiv:2307.04254Jul 9, 20230 citations

What Does the Wavefunction Represent?

Spiros Koutandos

As was Einstein s original idea we suppose that the speed of light is altered in the presence of mass by a change in its dielectric susceptibility. Our explanation of the phenomena of quantum mechanics is a continuation of Einstein search for hidden variables. Mass induces a curvature in spacetime. This has two effects. New volume is created and this would mean that there is not exactly a point particle but matters in a way occupies some volume. Another result is that spacetime becomes cyclic and quantities like the action are quantized because they depend on angles through which the observer witnesses the events.

Global Journal of Human Social ScienceAug 25, 20230 citations

The Observer Capacity Theorem: ObserverDependent Reality, the Double-Slit as Branch Visibility, and the Biological Rendering Hypothesis Part 11: How Observer Biology Determines Which Slice of Reality Is Perceived, and Why No Single Species Sees the Complete Universe

Dr Akshay Honrao, BDS,PGDIP(Orthodontics)

Imagine three people looking at the same sunset. One is colourblind — they see grey and blue.One has normal vision — they see orange, red, and purple. One is a mantis shrimp(hypothetically) — they see 16 colours, including ultraviolet patterns invisible to the other two.Same sunset. Three different experiences. None of them is "wrong." Each sees the real sunset —but filtered through their biology.Now apply this to the deepest question in physics: is light a wave or a particle? The answerdepends on WHO is asking. A species that can only detect waves would say "light is a wave,obviously." A species that can only detect particles would say "light is a particle, obviously."Humans can detect both, so we're confused — we see two contradictory truths.This paper argues that wave-particle duality isn't a mystery about LIGHT. It's a fact aboutOBSERVERS. Different observers see different slices of the same reality. The universe has onenature — but no single species can see all of it. The double-slit experiment doesn't show ussomething weird about photons. It shows us the limits of our own perception. 🌌 Interactive Space Research Assistant: Explore and ask questions about this research interactively with the Quantum Ocean Framework Ai Chat (or talk directly with the Quantum Ocean Framework Ai voice conversation).

Aug 22, 20260 citations