A system of two equations is found that has solutions which coincide with the solutions of the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame. This system includes the Schrödinger equation for a free neutral spinless particle. Using the Schrödinger equation as an additional condition for solving the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame leads to two Helmholtz equations. Helmholtz equations can be solved by specifying a particle model and boundary conditions. One of the Helmholtz equations leads to discreteness of the rest masses of relativistic particles.
A system of two equations is found that has solutions which coincide with the solutions of the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame. This system includes the Schrödinger equation for a free neutral spinless particle. Using the Schrödinger equation as an additional condition for solving the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame leads to two Helmholtz equations. Helmholtz equations can be solved by specifying a particle model and boundary conditions. One of the Helmholtz equations leads to discreteness of the rest masses of relativistic particles.
The Klein-Gordon equation describes the wave-like behavior of spinless particles since it is Lorentz invariant. While it seemed initially ripe for explaining the electronic structure of the hydrogen atom, the lack of a unconditional positive probability density really limited its applications. Yet, it is intimately connected with fermions. Any solution to the Dirac equation is automatically a solution to the Klein-Gordon equation. What is even more surprising, the Klein-Gordon equation for a free particle turns into the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit. In this work we show that these problems disappear when we use the relativistic mass instead of the rest mass. While the Klein-Gordon equation losses its Lorentz invariance because of this transformation, it gains most of the features present the Schrödinger equation, including the unconditional positivity of probability density, while keeping most of its relativistic characteristics intact, including the matter-wave dispersion relation. What is even more surprising, the non-relativistic, quasi-static limit of the Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass is simply the Schrödinger equation under all possible conditions. So, it can be argued that this Klein-Gordon equation is a sort of relativistic Schrödinger equation.
We seek to introduce a mathematical method to derive the Klein-Gordon equation and a set of relevant laws strictly, which combines the relativistic wave functions in two inertial frames of reference. If we define the stationary state wave functions as special solutions like Ψ(r,t)=ψ(r)e−iEt/ℏ, and define m=E/c2, which is called the mass of the system, then the Klein-Gordon equation can clearly be expressed in a better form when compared with the non-relativistic limit, which not only allows us to transplant the solving approach of the Schrödinger equation into the relativistic wave equations, but also proves that the stationary solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation in a potential field have the probability significance. For comparison, we have also discussed the Dirac equation. By introducing the concept of system mass into the Klein-Gordon equation with the scalar and vector potentials, we prove that if the Schr\"{o dinger equation in a certain potential field can be solved exactly, then under the condition that the scalar and vector potentials are equal, the Klein-Gordon equation in the same potential field can also be solved exactly by using the same method.
This chapter introduces the concepts of the relativistic theory to basic problems of quantum physics, in particular, the extension of the Schrodinger equation to a relativistic form. Starting from the fundamental laws of relativity, the chapter evaluates the Klein–Gordon equation and investigates if the equation can be considered a generalization of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation to the case of the relativistic energy. The chapter shows that the wave function, which is a solution to the Klein–Gordon equation, cannot be connected with the probability wave function. For this reason, the Dirac equation is used to solve the problems faced by the Klein–Gordon equation. The Dirac equation also includes the spin. The advantage of the Dirac equation over the Schrodinger and Klein–Gordon equations is that it naturally includes the spin. In the Schrodinger and Klein–Gordon equations, the spin is not present and has to be added to the wave function manually whenever the wave function determines a system with the spin.
The Klein–Gordon equation, written down in 1926 by Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon (and earlier in unpublished form by Schrödinger himself), is the natural relativistic extension of quantum mechanics for spin‑zero particles: (□ + m²c²/ℏ²) Ψ = 0 where □ = (1/c²) ∂ₜ² − ∇². The equation is second‑order in both time and space, treats them symmetrically, and reduces to the free‑particle Schrödinger equation in the non‑relativistic limit. Its plane‑wave solutions satisfy the relativistic mass‑shell condition E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Why is a relativistic version needed at all? The Schrödinger equation describes how quantum systems evolve when they’re moving slowly compared to the speed of light — fine for atoms, molecules, and everyday chemistry, where electrons move at less than 1% of c. But the Schrödinger equation is first‑order in time and second‑order in space, treating the two on different footings. Special relativity says space and time are unified into a single four‑dimensional structure where Lorentz transformations mix them, and any equation that privileges time over space breaks Lorentz invariance. A truly fundamental quantum equation must respect this symmetry. Klein–Gordon is the minimal scalar‑field equation that does. The standard derivation runs by analogy: start with the relativistic energy–momentum relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, replace E by iℏ∂ₜ and p by −iℏ∇, apply both sides to a wavefunction. This produces the right equation but it’s not really a derivation — it’s a guess motivated by the Schrödinger operator‑substitution procedure. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the Klein–Gordon equation from substrate primitives — the same primitives that gave the Born rule, the Schrödinger equation, and the Bell–Tsirelson bound — plus the commitment to Lorentz covariance. The participation measure becomes Lorentz‑covariant. The unique second‑order Lorentz‑scalar differential operator on a scalar field is the d’Alembertian; the minimum‑order Lorentz‑scalar linear equation is therefore (□ + M²) Ψ = 0. Dimensional analysis fixes M² = m²c²/ℏ². Local U(1) gauge invariance forces the covariant derivative and the conserved four‑current. The non‑relativistic limit, via rest‑energy factorization, recovers the free‑particle Schrödinger equation exactly. The structural payoff: the Klein–Gordon equation is what you get when the substrate ontology is pushed through a Lorentz‑covariant reformulation. No new primitives are required. Relativistic and non‑relativistic quantum mechanics are not two theories glued together by analogy; they are the same substrate ontology applied at different velocity regimes. The walkthrough is honest about the known caveats — negative‑energy solutions and the non‑positive‑definite j₀ current — both of which resolve at the Dirac level and at QFT.
In the search for a relativistic wave equation for a free particle of rest mass m one must demand that the energy(E)-momentum (p) [dispersion] relation E2 = m2c4 + p2c2 (25.1) is satisfied. By the substitutions E → i~ ∂ ∂t , p→ −i~∇ (25.2) in Eq. (25.1) one obtains an operator, which when acting on a scalar wave function, gives us the Klein-Gordon wave equation for a spinless particle. The Klein-Gordon equation is of second order in the space (r) and time (t) coordinates. If one seeks a covariant first-order differential equation, r and t must play symmetric roles. A natural starting point therefore would be a linear dispersion relation of the form E = βmc2 + cα · p, (25.3) where β and α = (α1, α2, α3) are real and dimensionless. Since Eq. (25.3) must be compatible with Eq. (25.1), squaring of Eq. (25.3) leads to the following relations [already given in Eqs. (10.77)-(10.79)]: β2 = 1, (25.4) αiβ + βαi = 0, (25.5) αiαj + αjαi = 2δij , (25.6) where i, j = 1, 2, 3 (x, y, z). It is clear from Eqs. (25.4)-(25.6) that β and α cannot be numbers, but one can find matrices which satisfy these equations. Since the Hamiltonian appearing upon a substitution of the connections in (25.2) into Eq. (25.3) must be Hermitian, the αi and β matrices also have to be Hermitian, i.e., α†i = αi, i = 1− 3, (25.7) β† = β. (25.8) One can show that the matrices must have even rank and that the rank must be at least 4, see, e.g., [88]. The Dirac equation, which describes the quantum mechanics of a spin1/2 elementary particle, e.g., an electron, relates to a four-dimensional realization of Eqs. (25.4)-(25.8). Representations of a given rank are not unique.
It was pointed out in a previous paper that although neither the Klein-Gordon equation nor the Dirac Hamiltonian produces sound solitary free-particle relativistic quantum mechanics, the natural square-root relativistic Hamiltonian for a nonzero-mass free particle does achieve this. Failures of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac theories are reviewed: the solitary Dirac free particle has, inter alia, an invariant speed well in excess of c and staggering spontaneous Compton acceleration, but no pathologies whatsoever arise from the square-root relativistic Hamiltonian. Dirac’s key misapprehension of the underlying four-vector character of the time-dependent, configuration-representation Schrodinger equation for a solitary particle is laid bare, as is the invalidity of the standard “proof” that the nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac equation is the Pauli equation. Lorentz boosts from the particle rest frame point uniquely to the square-root Hamiltonian, but these don’t exist for a massless particle. Instead, Maxwell’s equations are dissected in spatial Fourier transform to separate nondynamical longitudinal from dynamical transverse field degrees of freedom. Upon their decoupling in the absence of sources, the transverse field components are seen to obey two identical time-dependent Schrodinger equations (owing to two linear polarizations), which have the massless free-particle diagonalized square-root Hamiltonian. Those fields are readily modified to conform to the attributes of solitary-photon wave functions. The wave functions’ relations to the potentials in radiation gauge are also worked out. The exercise is then repeated without the considerable benefit of the spatial Fourier transform.