Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1008.4224

Stationary Solutions of the Klein-Gordon Equation in a Potential Field

Guang-Qing Bi, Yuekai Bi

Published Aug 25, 2010• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We seek to introduce a mathematical method to derive the Klein-Gordon equation and a set of relevant laws strictly, which combines the relativistic wave functions in two inertial frames of reference. If we define the stationary state wave functions as special solutions like $Ψ(\mathbf{r},t)=ψ(\mathbf{r})e^{-iEt/\hbar}$, and define $m=E/c^2$, which is called the mass of the system, then the Klein-Gordon equation can clearly be expressed in a better form when compared with the non-relativistic limit, which not only allows us to transplant the solving approach of the Schrödinger equation into the relativistic wave equations, but also proves that the stationary solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation in a potential field have the probability significance. For comparison, we have also discussed the Dirac equation. By introducing the concept of system mass into the Klein-Gordon equation with the scalar and vector potentials, we prove that if the Schr\"{o dinger equation in a certain potential field can be solved exactly, then under the condition that the scalar and vector potentials are equal, the Klein-Gordon equation in the same potential field can also be solved exactly by using the same method.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1008.4224

Related papers

The Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass: a relativistic Schrödinger equation

P.-A. Gourdain

The Klein-Gordon equation describes the wave-like behavior of spinless particles since it is Lorentz invariant. While it seemed initially ripe for explaining the electronic structure of the hydrogen atom, the lack of a unconditional positive probability density really limited its applications. Yet, it is intimately connected with fermions. Any solution to the Dirac equation is automatically a solution to the Klein-Gordon equation. What is even more surprising, the Klein-Gordon equation for a free particle turns into the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit. In this work we show that these problems disappear when we use the relativistic mass instead of the rest mass. While the Klein-Gordon equation losses its Lorentz invariance because of this transformation, it gains most of the features present the Schrödinger equation, including the unconditional positivity of probability density, while keeping most of its relativistic characteristics intact, including the matter-wave dispersion relation. What is even more surprising, the non-relativistic, quasi-static limit of the Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass is simply the Schrödinger equation under all possible conditions. So, it can be argued that this Klein-Gordon equation is a sort of relativistic Schrödinger equation.

arXiv:2501.07798•Jan 14, 2025•0 citations

Relativistic Schrödinger Equation

Z. Ficek

This chapter introduces the concepts of the relativistic theory to basic problems of quantum physics, in particular, the extension of the Schrodinger equation to a relativistic form. Starting from the fundamental laws of relativity, the chapter evaluates the Klein–Gordon equation and investigates if the equation can be considered a generalization of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation to the case of the relativistic energy. The chapter shows that the wave function, which is a solution to the Klein–Gordon equation, cannot be connected with the probability wave function. For this reason, the Dirac equation is used to solve the problems faced by the Klein–Gordon equation. The Dirac equation also includes the spin. The advantage of the Dirac equation over the Schrodinger and Klein–Gordon equations is that it naturally includes the spin. In the Schrodinger and Klein–Gordon equations, the spin is not present and has to be added to the wave function manually whenever the wave function determines a system with the spin.

•Mar 3, 2017•0 citations

Klein‐Gordon and Schrödinger equations for a free particle in the rest frame

V. N. Salomatov

A system of two equations is found that has solutions which coincide with the solutions of the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame. This system includes the Schrödinger equation for a free neutral spinless particle. Using the Schrödinger equation as an additional condition for solving the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame leads to two Helmholtz equations. Helmholtz equations can be solved by specifying a particle model and boundary conditions. One of the Helmholtz equations leads to discreteness of the rest masses of relativistic particles.

Physics Essays•Mar 23, 2020•1 citation

The Dirac Equation

Luciano Maiani, Omar Benhar

According to non-relativistic quantummechanics, the evolution of the wave function of a free particle of mass m and momentum p is described by the Schro¨dinger equation: i ∂ψ ∂t = Hψ , (6.1) with the Hamiltonian operator H = −∇2/2m obtained from the expression for energy E = p2 2m , (6.2) using the substitution E → i ∂ ∂t , p → −i∇ . (6.3) Schro¨dinger himself [6] first suggested a generalisation of equation (6.1) based on the use of the relativistic energy equation: E2 = p2 +m2 . (6.4) (+m2)ψ = 0 , (6.5) Multiplying by ψ∗ and subtracting the product of ψ and the complex conjugate of (6.5) from the result, the continuity equation is obtained ∂ρ ∂t = ∇j , (6.6) with ρ = ψ∗ ∂ψ ∂t − ψ∂ψ ∂t (6.7) and j = −∇ (ψ∗∇ψ − ψ∇ψ∗) . (6.8) However, the ρ which appears in equation (6.6) cannot be identified with the probability density, in analogy with the similar quantity obtained from the Schro¨dinger equation, because it does not have the required property of being always positive-definite. To be convinced of this it is sufficient to substitute i∂/∂t→ E in (6.7). The result, ρ = E|ψ|2 , shows that ρ can be either positive or negative, following from the fact that the Klein-Gordon equation has solutions for the energy with both signs E = ± √ p2 +m2 , Note that in the non-relativistic limit E ≈ m > 0, and the familiar result ρ ∝ |ψ|2 is recovered.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 18, 2015•0 citations

From Primitives to the Klein–Gordon Equation

Allen Proxmire

The Klein–Gordon equation, written down in 1926 by Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon (and earlier in unpublished form by Schrödinger himself), is the natural relativistic extension of quantum mechanics for spin‑zero particles: (□ + m²c²/ℏ²) Ψ = 0 where □ = (1/c²) ∂ₜ² − ∇². The equation is second‑order in both time and space, treats them symmetrically, and reduces to the free‑particle Schrödinger equation in the non‑relativistic limit. Its plane‑wave solutions satisfy the relativistic mass‑shell condition E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Why is a relativistic version needed at all? The Schrödinger equation describes how quantum systems evolve when they’re moving slowly compared to the speed of light — fine for atoms, molecules, and everyday chemistry, where electrons move at less than 1% of c. But the Schrödinger equation is first‑order in time and second‑order in space, treating the two on different footings. Special relativity says space and time are unified into a single four‑dimensional structure where Lorentz transformations mix them, and any equation that privileges time over space breaks Lorentz invariance. A truly fundamental quantum equation must respect this symmetry. Klein–Gordon is the minimal scalar‑field equation that does. The standard derivation runs by analogy: start with the relativistic energy–momentum relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, replace E by iℏ∂ₜ and p by −iℏ∇, apply both sides to a wavefunction. This produces the right equation but it’s not really a derivation — it’s a guess motivated by the Schrödinger operator‑substitution procedure. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the Klein–Gordon equation from substrate primitives — the same primitives that gave the Born rule, the Schrödinger equation, and the Bell–Tsirelson bound — plus the commitment to Lorentz covariance. The participation measure becomes Lorentz‑covariant. The unique second‑order Lorentz‑scalar differential operator on a scalar field is the d’Alembertian; the minimum‑order Lorentz‑scalar linear equation is therefore (□ + M²) Ψ = 0. Dimensional analysis fixes M² = m²c²/ℏ². Local U(1) gauge invariance forces the covariant derivative and the conserved four‑current. The non‑relativistic limit, via rest‑energy factorization, recovers the free‑particle Schrödinger equation exactly. The structural payoff: the Klein–Gordon equation is what you get when the substrate ontology is pushed through a Lorentz‑covariant reformulation. No new primitives are required. Relativistic and non‑relativistic quantum mechanics are not two theories glued together by analogy; they are the same substrate ontology applied at different velocity regimes. The walkthrough is honest about the known caveats — negative‑energy solutions and the non‑positive‑definite j₀ current — both of which resolve at the Dirac level and at QFT.

•May 12, 2026•0 citations

A secondary solution of the Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon equations in modeling atomic, molecular and electrodynamic systems

Alexandru Popa

We study atomic and molecular (AM) stationary systems and electrodynamic (ED) systems, composed of an electron interacting with an electromagnetic field. We show that the Schr?dinger and Klein-Gordon equations written for these systems have a secondary solution, which is the wave function associated to a classical system. For AM systems, the wave surfaces (S surfaces) and their normals (C curves) are solutions of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, written for the same system. The S surfaces have a periodical motion and the C curves are closed. The integral relation of the Schr?dinger equation on the C curve has a solution identical to the wave function associated to the classical motion. This solution leads to the generalized Bohr quantization relation and to the generalized de Broglie relations, which are valid in the space of the electron coordinates. An identical wave function verifies the Klein-Gordon equation, in the case of the EM systems. The above properties lead to a central field method for calculation of the energetic values and symmetry properties for AM systems, whose accuracy is comparable to the accuracy of the Hartree-Fock method. They also lead to an accurate method for modeling EM systems, which is verified by experimental data from the literature. The above properties are deduced without using any approximation.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 11, 2014•0 citations
We seek to introduce a mathematical method to derive the Klein-Gordon equation and a set of relevant laws strictly, which combines the relativistic wave functions in two inertial frames of reference. If we define the stationary state wave functions as special solutions like Ψ(r,t)=ψ(r)e−iEt/ℏΨ(\mathbf{r},t)=ψ(\mathbf{r})e^{-iEt/\hbar}Ψ(r,t)=ψ(r)e−iEt/ℏ, and define m=E/c2m=E/c^2m=E/c2, which is called the mass of the system, then the Klein-Gordon equation can clearly be expressed in a better form when compared with the non-relativistic limit, which not only allows us to transplant the solving approach of the Schrödinger equation into the relativistic wave equations, but also proves that the stationary solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation in a potential field have the probability significance. For comparison, we have also discussed the Dirac equation. By introducing the concept of system mass into the Klein-Gordon equation with the scalar and vector potentials, we prove that if the Schr"{o dinger equation in a certain potential field can be solved exactly, then under the condition that the scalar and vector potentials are equal, the Klein-Gordon equation in the same potential field can also be solved exactly by using the same method.
The Klein-Gordon equation describes the wave-like behavior of spinless particles since it is Lorentz invariant. While it seemed initially ripe for explaining the electronic structure of the hydrogen atom, the lack of a unconditional positive probability density really limited its applications. Yet, it is intimately connected with fermions. Any solution to the Dirac equation is automatically a solution to the Klein-Gordon equation. What is even more surprising, the Klein-Gordon equation for a free particle turns into the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit. In this work we show that these problems disappear when we use the relativistic mass instead of the rest mass. While the Klein-Gordon equation losses its Lorentz invariance because of this transformation, it gains most of the features present the Schrödinger equation, including the unconditional positivity of probability density, while keeping most of its relativistic characteristics intact, including the matter-wave dispersion relation. What is even more surprising, the non-relativistic, quasi-static limit of the Klein-Gordon equation with relativistic mass is simply the Schrödinger equation under all possible conditions. So, it can be argued that this Klein-Gordon equation is a sort of relativistic Schrödinger equation.
This chapter introduces the concepts of the relativistic theory to basic problems of quantum physics, in particular, the extension of the Schrodinger equation to a relativistic form. Starting from the fundamental laws of relativity, the chapter evaluates the Klein–Gordon equation and investigates if the equation can be considered a generalization of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation to the case of the relativistic energy. The chapter shows that the wave function, which is a solution to the Klein–Gordon equation, cannot be connected with the probability wave function. For this reason, the Dirac equation is used to solve the problems faced by the Klein–Gordon equation. The Dirac equation also includes the spin. The advantage of the Dirac equation over the Schrodinger and Klein–Gordon equations is that it naturally includes the spin. In the Schrodinger and Klein–Gordon equations, the spin is not present and has to be added to the wave function manually whenever the wave function determines a system with the spin.
A system of two equations is found that has solutions which coincide with the solutions of the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame. This system includes the Schrödinger equation for a free neutral spinless particle. Using the Schrödinger equation as an additional condition for solving the Klein‐Gordon equation in the rest frame leads to two Helmholtz equations. Helmholtz equations can be solved by specifying a particle model and boundary conditions. One of the Helmholtz equations leads to discreteness of the rest masses of relativistic particles.
According to non-relativistic quantummechanics, the evolution of the wave function of a free particle of mass m and momentum p is described by the Schro¨dinger equation: i ∂ψ ∂t = Hψ , (6.1) with the Hamiltonian operator H = −∇2/2m obtained from the expression for energy E = p2 2m , (6.2) using the substitution E → i ∂ ∂t , p → −i∇ . (6.3) Schro¨dinger himself [6] first suggested a generalisation of equation (6.1) based on the use of the relativistic energy equation: E2 = p2 +m2 . (6.4) (+m2)ψ = 0 , (6.5) Multiplying by ψ∗ and subtracting the product of ψ and the complex conjugate of (6.5) from the result, the continuity equation is obtained ∂ρ ∂t = ∇j , (6.6) with ρ = ψ∗ ∂ψ ∂t − ψ∂ψ ∂t (6.7) and j = −∇ (ψ∗∇ψ − ψ∇ψ∗) . (6.8) However, the ρ which appears in equation (6.6) cannot be identified with the probability density, in analogy with the similar quantity obtained from the Schro¨dinger equation, because it does not have the required property of being always positive-definite. To be convinced of this it is sufficient to substitute i∂/∂t→ E in (6.7). The result, ρ = E|ψ|2 , shows that ρ can be either positive or negative, following from the fact that the Klein-Gordon equation has solutions for the energy with both signs E = ± √ p2 +m2 , Note that in the non-relativistic limit E ≈ m > 0, and the familiar result ρ ∝ |ψ|2 is recovered.
The Klein–Gordon equation, written down in 1926 by Oskar Klein and Walter Gordon (and earlier in unpublished form by Schrödinger himself), is the natural relativistic extension of quantum mechanics for spin‑zero particles: (□ + m²c²/ℏ²) Ψ = 0 where □ = (1/c²) ∂ₜ² − ∇². The equation is second‑order in both time and space, treats them symmetrically, and reduces to the free‑particle Schrödinger equation in the non‑relativistic limit. Its plane‑wave solutions satisfy the relativistic mass‑shell condition E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Why is a relativistic version needed at all? The Schrödinger equation describes how quantum systems evolve when they’re moving slowly compared to the speed of light — fine for atoms, molecules, and everyday chemistry, where electrons move at less than 1% of c. But the Schrödinger equation is first‑order in time and second‑order in space, treating the two on different footings. Special relativity says space and time are unified into a single four‑dimensional structure where Lorentz transformations mix them, and any equation that privileges time over space breaks Lorentz invariance. A truly fundamental quantum equation must respect this symmetry. Klein–Gordon is the minimal scalar‑field equation that does. The standard derivation runs by analogy: start with the relativistic energy–momentum relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, replace E by iℏ∂ₜ and p by −iℏ∇, apply both sides to a wavefunction. This produces the right equation but it’s not really a derivation — it’s a guess motivated by the Schrödinger operator‑substitution procedure. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the Klein–Gordon equation from substrate primitives — the same primitives that gave the Born rule, the Schrödinger equation, and the Bell–Tsirelson bound — plus the commitment to Lorentz covariance. The participation measure becomes Lorentz‑covariant. The unique second‑order Lorentz‑scalar differential operator on a scalar field is the d’Alembertian; the minimum‑order Lorentz‑scalar linear equation is therefore (□ + M²) Ψ = 0. Dimensional analysis fixes M² = m²c²/ℏ². Local U(1) gauge invariance forces the covariant derivative and the conserved four‑current. The non‑relativistic limit, via rest‑energy factorization, recovers the free‑particle Schrödinger equation exactly. The structural payoff: the Klein–Gordon equation is what you get when the substrate ontology is pushed through a Lorentz‑covariant reformulation. No new primitives are required. Relativistic and non‑relativistic quantum mechanics are not two theories glued together by analogy; they are the same substrate ontology applied at different velocity regimes. The walkthrough is honest about the known caveats — negative‑energy solutions and the non‑positive‑definite j₀ current — both of which resolve at the Dirac level and at QFT.
We study atomic and molecular (AM) stationary systems and electrodynamic (ED) systems, composed of an electron interacting with an electromagnetic field. We show that the Schr?dinger and Klein-Gordon equations written for these systems have a secondary solution, which is the wave function associated to a classical system. For AM systems, the wave surfaces (S surfaces) and their normals (C curves) are solutions of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, written for the same system. The S surfaces have a periodical motion and the C curves are closed. The integral relation of the Schr?dinger equation on the C curve has a solution identical to the wave function associated to the classical motion. This solution leads to the generalized Bohr quantization relation and to the generalized de Broglie relations, which are valid in the space of the electron coordinates. An identical wave function verifies the Klein-Gordon equation, in the case of the EM systems. The above properties lead to a central field method for calculation of the energetic values and symmetry properties for AM systems, whose accuracy is comparable to the accuracy of the Hartree-Fock method. They also lead to an accurate method for modeling EM systems, which is verified by experimental data from the literature. The above properties are deduced without using any approximation.